Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-m6qld Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T08:38:03.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of straw availability for nest-building on maternal reactivity of crated sows after farrowing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

J. N. Marchant
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, De Montfort University, Caythorpe, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG32 3EP, U.K.
K.H. Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
R.M. Forde
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, De Montfort University, Caythorpe, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG32 3EP, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Most indoor sows in Denmark and the UK continue to farrow in crates. Before farrowing, sows are highly motivated to nest-build and gilts farrowing in crates without straw have an especially large stress response over the nest-building period (Jarvis et al., 1997). In non-crated sows, the inability to nest-build affects the subsequent maternal behaviour of the sow after farrowing (Herskin et al., 1999). This study aimed to determine whether supplying straw before farrowing increased the anti-crushing and anti-predator behaviour of the crated sow after farrowing and improved piglet survival.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Herskin, M.S., Jensen, K.H., Thodberg, K. (1999). Influence of environmental stimuli on nursing and suckling behaviour in domestic sows and piglets. Animal Science, 68: 2734.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., Lawrence, A.B., McLean, K.A., Deans, L.A., Chirnside, J. and Calvert, S.K. (1997) The effect of environment on behavioural activity, ACTH, b-endorphin and cortisol in pre-farrowing gilts. Animal Science, 65: 465472.Google Scholar