Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:40:29.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GROUP MODEL BUILDING WITH CAUSAL LOOP DIAGRAMS TO FOSTER CAPABILITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

M. Watz  and
S. I. Hallstedt
M. Watz*
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
S. I. Hallstedt
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
*
*matilda.watz@bth.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This research proposes a group model building workshop method that uses causal loop diagrams to foster capabilities for sustainable product development based on feedback and observations from several cases. The method's potential to enhance sustainability system thinking skills and to identify relationships between sustainability criteria and traditionally identified requirements is evaluated. The method can trigger discussion, visualize complexity and dependencies of sustainable design problems. Other application areas are e.g., sustainability training for practicing engineers and students.

Keywords

sustainable designcomplexitydesign methodsgroup model buildingcausal loop diagrams
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2207 - 2216
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Andersen, D.F. et al. (2007), “Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 691–694. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J. and Venable, J. (2009), “Soft design science methodology”, In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555619.1555631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM: A design reseach methodology, Springer, London, pp. 13–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1_2Google Scholar
Brones, F., de Carvalho, M.M. and de Senzi Zancul, E. (2014), “Ecodesign in project management: a missing link for the integration of sustainability in product development?”, Journal of Cleaner Production (JLCP), Vol. 80, pp. 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.088Google Scholar
Brones, F.A., de Carvalho, M.M. and de Senzi Zancul, E. (2017), “Reviews, action and learning on change management for ecodesign transition”, JLCP, Vol. 142, pp. 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.009Google Scholar
Byggeth, S. and Hochschorner, E. (2006), “Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement”, JLCP, Vol. 14 No. 15-16, pp. 1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024Google Scholar
Ceschin, F. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2016), “Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions”, Design studies, Vol. 47, pp. 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, R. (2018), The individual human side of supporting sustainable design beginners [Doctoral dissertation], Blekinge Institute of Technology. ISBN: 9789172953574Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. (2017), “Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development”, JLCP, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 140, pp. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068Google Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. and Nylander, J.W. (2019), “Sustainability research implementation in product development-learnings from a longitudinal study”, In Proceedings of the Design Society: Int. Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, The Netherlands, August, 2019, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3381–3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, M. et al. (2018), “Current challenges for sustainable product development in the German automotive sector: A survey based status assessment”, JLCP, Vol. 195, pp. 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.118Google Scholar
Hjorth, P. and Bagheri, A. (2006), “Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach”, Futures, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaghbeer, Y. et al. (2017), “Exploration of simulation-driven support tools for sustainable product development”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 64, pp. 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotonya, G. and Sommerville, I. (1998), Requirements engineering: processes and techniques, Wiley Publishing, ISBN: 0471972088 9780471972082.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. et al. (2014), “Group Model-Building to identify potential sources of environmental impacts outside the scope of LCA studies”, JLCP, Vol. 72, pp. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.001Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. (2016), The karma of products: Exploring the causality of environmental pressure with causal loop diagram and environmental footprint [Doctoral dissertation], KTH Royal Institute of Technology. ISBN: 9789175959108Google Scholar
MacDonald, E.F. and She, J. (2015), “Seven cognitive concepts for successful eco-design”, JLCP, Vol. 92, pp. 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.096Google Scholar
McCardle-Keurentjes, M.H. et al. (2018), “Potential benefits of model use in group model building: insights from an experimental investigation”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 34 No. 1-2, pp. 354–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, J.M.F. et al. (2017), “Integrating Backcasting and Eco-Design for the Circular Economy: The BECE Framework”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 526–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, S., Sundin, E. and Lindahl, M. (2018), “Integrated product service offerings–Challenges in setting requirements”, JLCP, Vol. 201, pp. 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.090Google Scholar
Ny, H. (2009), Strategic life-cycle modeling and simulation for sustainable product innovation [Doctoral dissertation], Blekinge Institute of Technology. ISBN: 9789172951655Google Scholar
Palinkas, L.A. et al. (2015), “Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research”, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigosso, D.C., Rozenfeld, H. and McAloone, T.C. (2013), “Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies”, JLCP, Vol. 59, pp. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040Google Scholar
Poorkiany, M. (2017), Managing design rationale in the development of product families and related design automation systems [Doctoral dissertation], Jönköping University, School of Engineering. ISBN: 9789187289323Google Scholar
Poudelet, V. et al. (2012), “A process-based approach to operationalize life cycle assessment through the development of an eco-design decision-support system”, JLCP, Vol. 33, pp. 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.005Google Scholar
Rodrigues, V.P. (2018), “In search of gold”: measuring performance and evaluating potential business benefits of ecodesign, [Doctoral dissertation], DCAMM Report, no. S252, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical Engineering.Google Scholar
Rouwette, E.A. et al. (2011), “Modeling as persuasion: the impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.441Google Scholar
Schreier, M. (2012), Qualitative content analysis in practice, SAGE, London; Los Angeles. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.15aaf, [Calif.].Google Scholar
Siva, V., Gremyr, I. and Halldórsson, Á. (2018), “Organising Sustainability Competencies through Quality Management: Integration or Specialisation”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 5, p. 1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2012), Product design and development (5., Int. ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston, Mass. ISBN: 9780071086950Google Scholar
Vennix, J.A.M. (1996), Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Waage, S.A. (2007), “Re-considering product design: a practical ‘road-map’ for integration of sustainability issues”, JLCP, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.026Google Scholar
Watz, M. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2018), “Integrating Sustainability in Product Requirements”, In DS92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th Int. Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2018, pp. 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watz, M. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2020), “Profile model for management of sustainability integration in engineering design requirements”, JLCP, Vol. 247, p. 119155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119155CrossRefGoogle Scholar