No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
DESIGNING SOLUTIONS FOR UNCERTAIN FUTURES: A CHECKLIST FOR CHOOSING SUITABLE SCENARIOS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Future scenarios are intermediary artefacts for mid- and long-term design of complex solutions, e.g., to improve urban mobility systems. They allow designers to explore possible alternatives and incorporate uncertainty in the process. While their making is widely studied and implemented in scenario planning, their assessment got little attention. To find out which characteristics of scenarios we can assess, we conducted interviews and an expert workshop. This results in a scenario assessment framework of 3 levels: Assessment of system impact, evaluation of impact on practitioners and quality assurance. We focus on the latter as it represents the key gap and established a checklist for it. We distinguish between the level of engagement, i.e., scenario makers and users who adapt existing sets (or archetypes). Finally, we provide a checklist to aid ensuring that when choosing existing scenario sets, key criteria are fulfilled. This shall enable designers to better integrate scenarios in their workflows. We provide examples of designing mobility solutions. Yet, the findings can be applied to all disciplines where scenarios can aid design processes but are so far limited due to the resources needed for creating meaningful scenarios.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.H., Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G. (2006), “Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide”, Futures, Vol. 38/7, pp. 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouillass, G. (2021), “Sustainability analysis of electric mobility scenarios with a life cycle perspective”, PhD Doctorate. Université PSL, Ecole des Mines ParisTech.Google Scholar
Carlsen, H., Klein, R., and Wikman-Svahn, P. (2017), “Transparent scenario development”, Nature Climate Change, 7/613. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3379Google Scholar
Chermack, T. J. (2006), “Assessing the quality of scenarios in scenario planning”, Futures Research Quarterly, Res. Q. 23.Google Scholar
Chermack, T. J. (2011), “Scenario Planning in Organizations: How to Create, Use and Assess Scenarios”, Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Millet, D., and Leroy, Y. (2014), “Exploitation scenarios in industrial system LCA”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19/1, pp. 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0631-z/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, M. M. (2019), “A comprehensive scenario intervention typology”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 149, p. 119748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119748/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnin, S., Brooks, B., and Brooks, O. (2022). “Assessing the influence of individual creativity, perceptions of group decision-making and structured techniques on the quality of scenario planning”, Futures, 103057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauré, E., Arushanyan, Y., Ekener, E., Miliutenko, S. and Finnveden, G. (2017), “Methods for assessing future scenarios from a sustainability perspective”, European Journal of Futures Research, 5/17. https://doi/org/10.1007/s40309-017-0121-9/Google Scholar
Gall, T., Vallet, F., and Yannou, B. (2022), “How to visualise futures studies concepts: Revision of the futures cone”, Futures, Vol. 143/103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103024Google Scholar
Goodspeed, R. (2020), “Scenario Planning for Cities and Regions: Managing and Envisioning Uncertain Futures”, Washingtion: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
Grandjean, A. et al. (2021), “Le rôle des infrastructures dans la transition bas-carbone et l'adaptation au changement climatique de la France”. Available at: https://www.carbone4.com/publication-infrastructures-france (28 November 2022).Google Scholar
Gräßler, I., Thiele, H., and Scholle, P. (2020), “Assessing the Future: Methods and criteria”, International Design Conference 2020, https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.278/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, R., Saxena, S., Banister, D., and Ashiru, O. (2012), “Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46/3, pp. 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006/Google Scholar
International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) (2006), “ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management, Life cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines”.Google Scholar
Gołda, Jacyna, Gołębiowski, I., Izdebski, P., Lewczuk, M., Kłodawski, K., Jachimowski, M., Szczepański, R., E. (2017), “Scenario analyses for a sustainable transport system development”, Vibroengineering Procedia, 13. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2017.19092Google Scholar
Karjalainen, L. E. and Juhola, S. (2021), “Urban Transportation Sustainability Assessments: A systematic Review of Literature”, Transport reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keseru, I., Coosemans, T., Macharis, C. (2021), “Stakeholders’ preferences for the future of transport in Europe: Participatory evaluation of scenarios combining scenario planning and the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis”, Futures, Vol. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102690/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosow, H. and Gaßner, R. (2008), “Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis: Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria”, SSOAR/Report, p. 111. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-193660Google Scholar
Kosow, H. (2015), “New outlooks in traceability and consistency of integrated scenarios”, European Journal of Futures Research, Vol. 3/16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-015-0077-6/Google Scholar
McGrail, S. and Gaziulusoy, I. (2014), “Using futures inquiry to create low-carbon, resilient urban futures: A review of practice, theory and process options for the Visions and Pathways project”, VP2040 Foreground paper [Preprint].Google Scholar
Meissner, P. and Wulf, T. (2013), “Cognitive benefits fo scenario planning: Its impact on biases and decision quality”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 8/4, pp. 801-–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, M. (2017), “A Five-Component Future Competence (5CFC) Model”, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, Vol. 23/2, pp. 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1296533/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, I., Hernández, P., Pérez-Iribarren, E., Pedrero, J., Arrizabalaga, E., Hermoso, N. (2020), “Methodology for integrated modelling and impact assessment of city energy system scenarios”, Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100553/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro-Ligero, M. L. and Valenzuela-Montes, L. M. (2016), “A Tool for the Assessment of Urban Mobility Scenarios in Climate Change Mitigation: An Application to the Granada's LRT Project”, Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 19, pp. 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.095/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogués, S., González-González, E., and Cordera, R. (2020), “New urban planning challenges under emerging autonomous mobility: evaluating backcasting scenarios and policies through an expert survey”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104652/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucci, P. (2021), “Spatial dimensions of electric mobility – Scenarios for efficient and fair diffusion of electric vehicles in the Milan Urban Region”, Cities, Vol. 110/103069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103069/Google Scholar
Schmidt-Scheele, R. (2020), “‘Plausible’ energy scenarios? How users assess uncertain futures”, Energy Strategy Reviews, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaniol, M. J. and Rowland, N. J. (2018), “Defining scenario”, Futures Foresight Sciences, 1:e3, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.3Google Scholar
Tapaninaho, M., Koho, M., Pihkola, H., and Heilala, J. (2014), “Developing a concept for sustainability indicators and reporting systems for finnish manufacturing industry”, The 6th Swedish Production Symposium.Google Scholar
Vallet, F., Puchinger, J., Millonig, A., Lamé, G., and Nicolaï, I. (2020), “Tangible futures: Combining scenario thinking and personas – A pilot study on urban mobility”, Futures, Vol. 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102513/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, S., O'Kane, P., and Ruwhiu, D. (2009), “Developing a theory of plausibility in scenario building: Designing plausible scenarios”, Futures, Vol. 111, pp. 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, I. (1998), “Mental maps of the future: An intuitive logics approach to scenario planning”, In: Fahey, L. and Randall, R. M. (eds). Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 81–108.Google Scholar
Yannou, B., Yvars, P.-A., Hoyle, C., Chen, W. (2013), “Set-based design by simulation of usage scenario coverage”, Journal of Engineering Design, 24/8, pp. 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2013.780201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access