Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T19:53:12.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engineering design education at German universities: potential for a common basis to create personalized e-learning content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Frederike Kossack  and
Beate Bender
Frederike Kossack*
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
Beate Bender
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
*
kossack@lpe.rub.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

E-learning materials require a high initial development effort but can then be used by a large number of students with little effort. It therefore seems reasonable to develop and use these across universities. Particularly in the field of Engineering Design Education, standardized principles through norms and guidelines lead to a high degree of transferability. For the development of such e-learning offers, however, the context of application must be identified. As a fundament for the development, this publication analyzes Engineering Design Education in Germany.

Keywords

engineering designdesign educationdigital learning
Type
Design Education
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2885 - 2894
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Albers, A., Denkena, B. and Matthiesen, S. (2012), Faszination Konstruktion: Berufsbild und Tätigkeitsfeld im Wandel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P., Kilian, L., Thillosen, A.M. and Zimmer, G.M. (2018), Handbuch E-Learning: Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien, utb Pädagogik, Vol. 4965, 5. Auflage, W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. and Tutor, C.G. (2006), “Möglichkeiten der Einschätzung von Selbstlernkompetenz”, in Euler, D., Lang, M. and Pätzold, G. (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Lernen in der beruflichen Bildung, Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (ZBW) Beihefte, Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arnold, Rolf (2015): Systemische Berufsbildung. Kompetenzentwicklung neu denken - mit einem Methoden-ABC. 2., unveränderte Auflage. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren GmbH (Systhemia, Band 4).Google Scholar
Baumann, C. and Benzing, T. (2013), “Output-Orientierung und Kompetenzformulierung im Bologna-Prozess”, available at: https://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/39030000/ZiLS/Material/Kompetenzorientierung/ Kompetenzformulierung_15.10.2013.pdf (accessed 13.11.21).Google Scholar
Berger, S. and Moser, U. (2020), “Adaptives Lernen und Testen”, journal für lehrerInnenbildung jlb 01-2020 Digitalisierung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2020), “Constructive Alignment: An Outcomes-Based Approach to Teaching Anatomy”, in Chan, L.K. and Pawlina, W. (Eds.), Teaching Anatomy, Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
Biggs, J.B. and Tang, C.S.-k. (2011), Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, UK Higher Education OUP Humanities and Social Sciences Higher Education OUP Ser, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
Dillenhöfer, F., Künne, B., Frye, S., Haertel, T., Altland, L., Kossack, F., Bender, B., Sersch, A., Gust, P., Lattner, Y., Müller, M., Hinse, D., Pantke, K., Bechthold, J., Frank, J., Richard, T., 2023. Development of Modular E-Learning Materials as OER for a MOOC, in: 17th International Conference on E-Learning and Digital Learning. Presented at the International Conference on e-Learning and Digital Learning, Springer International Publishing, Cham.Google Scholar
Dittler, U. and Kreidl, C. (Eds.) (2023), Wie Corona die Hochschullehre verändert: Erfahrungen und Gedanken aus der Krise zum zukünftigen Einsatz von eLearning, 2. Auflage 2023, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; Imprint Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessler, M. and Sebe-Opfermann, A. (2016), “Kompetenzmodelle”, in Müller-Vorbrüggen, M. und Radel, J. (Ed.), Handbuch Personalentwicklung: Die Praxis der Personalbildung, Personalförderung und Arbeitsstrukturierung, 4.th ed.Google Scholar
Gonzales-Almaguer, C. et al.: STEM COMPETENCY-BASED LEARNING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN STUDENTS OF THE EDUCATIONAL MODEL TEC21. DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2020). The Design Society 2020Google Scholar
Hoppe, L. V. et al.: DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM FOR DESIGN EDUCATION DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021). The Design Society 2021Google Scholar
ILIAS open source-e-Learning e.V., available at: https://docu.ilias.de/ilias.php?baseClass=ilImprintGUI (accessed 14 November 2023).Google Scholar
Kannengiesser, U., Gero, J., Wells, J. and Lammi, M. (2015), “DO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS BENEFIT FROM PRE-ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION?”, paper presented at International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), 27.-30.07.2015, Milan.Google Scholar
Kerpen, D. et al.: COMBINING COLLABORATIVE USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN WITH CROWDENGINEERING: A PROBLEM-BASED LAB COURSE for (UNDER-)GRADUATE STUDENTS. DS 110:Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE2021). The Design Society 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F. and Bender, B. (2022), “Heterogeneous groups of students as a challenge in engineering design education”, in DS 119: Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X (DFX2022), 22 and 23 September 2022, The Design Society, p. 10. https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/dfx2022.07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F. and Bender, B. (2023), “INDIVIDUALIZATION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION: IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (ADE-LE)”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 3, pp. 2295–2304. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F., Kattwinkel, D. and Bender, B. (2022), “Adaptive E-Learning for the Engineering Design Education at Ruhr-University Bochum”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 2313–2322. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.234Google Scholar
Kossack, F., Kattwinkel, D. and Bender, B. (2023a), “Potential of adaptive E-Learning for Engineering Design Education”, in IATED Publications (Ed.), ICERI2023 Proceedings. p.4665-4672, DOI; 10.21125/iceri.2023.1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossack, F., Uttich, E. and Bender, B. (2023b), “POTENTIAL OF ADAPTIVE E-LEARNING FOR KNOWLEDGE HETEROGENOUS GROUPS OF STUDENTS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION”, in Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D. G., Isaias, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age.Google Scholar
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002), “A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory into practice, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konferenz, Kultusminister (2017), “Qualifikationsrahmen für deutsche Hochschulabschlüsse”, available at: https://www.hrk.de/fileadmin/redaktion/hrk/02-Dokumente/02-03-Studium/02-03-02-Qualifikationsrahmen/2017_Qualifikationsrahmen_HQR.pdf (accessed 13 November 2023).Google Scholar
Mayer, H.O. and Hertnagel, J. (2009), Lernzielüberprüfung im eLearning, Oldenbourg, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contributors, Moodle (2022), “Fragetyp STACK”, available at: https://docs.moodle.org/400/de/Fragetyp_STACK (accessed 29 November 2022).Google Scholar
Niegemann, H.M. and Heidig, S. (2019), “Interaktivität und Adaptivität in multimedialen Lernumgebungen”, in Niegemann, H. and Weinberger, A. (Eds.), Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien, Springer Reference Psychologie, Vol. 73, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Pfäffli, B.K. (2015), Lehren an Hochschulen: Eine Hochschuldidaktik für den Aufbau von Wissen und Kompetenzen, UTB Schlüsselkompetenzen Hochschuldidaktik, Vol. 4325, 2., Haupt, Bern.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, G.D. (2009), E-Learning: Theorien, Gestaltungsempfehlungen und Forschung, Psychologie-Lehrbuch, 1. Auflage, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.Google Scholar
Schönwald, I. (2007), Change Management in Hochschulen: Die Gestaltung soziokultureller Veränderungsprozesse zur Integration von E-Learning in die Hochschullehre, Zugl.: St. Gallen, Univ., Diss., 2007, E-Learning, Vol. 12, 1. Aufl., Eul, Lohmar.Google Scholar
Stoyanov, S. and Kirschener, P. (2004), “Expert Concept Mapping Method for Defining the Characteristics of Adaptive E-Learning: ALFANET Project Case”, ETR&D, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., Haertel, T., May, D., Wilkemann, U. and Jahnke, I. (2018), “Technik- und Ingenieurdidaktik in der hochschulischen Bildung”, in Pittich, D., Zinn, B. and Tenberg, R. (Eds.), Technikdidaktik: Eine Bestandsaufnahme, Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
VDI 2221:2019-11: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme, Gestaltung individueller Pro-duktentwicklungsprozesse. Düsseldorf: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V.Google Scholar
Whitehead, T.; Buck, L.; Hewitt, J.: BLENDED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES IN PRODUCT DESIGNEDUCATION. DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021). The Design Society 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Produktentwicklung WiGeP e.V. (2018), Universitäre Lehre in der Produkentwicklung: Leifaden der Wissenschaftlichen Geselschaft für Produktentwicklung (WiGeP).Google Scholar
Žeželj, D. and Miler, D. (2018), “MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY-BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING ENGINEERING DRAWING”, in Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK, pp. 2553–2562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, S.; Jonuschies, I; Gericke, K.: ADAPTING COURSE DESIGN TO FOSTER THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPATIAL ABILITIES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION - A CASE STUDY. DS 110: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (EPDE 2021). The Design Society 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar