Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T07:39:51.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HEURISTIC DECISIONS AND COGNITIVE BIASES IN ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND JUNIOR ENGINEERS: CASE STUDIES FROM GERMANY AND THAILAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Narucha Tanaiutchawoot
Narucha Tanaiutchawoot*
Affiliation:
Suranaree University of Technology
*
Tanaiutchawoot, Narucha, Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand, narucha@g.sut.ac.th

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Understanding heuristics and cognitive biases might lessen their impact since they can cause decision errors. From the responses to the survey for case studies, this study aims to investigate the fundamental understanding of heuristics and cognitive biases in engineering students and junior engineers from Germany and Thailand. The results indicated that the majority of participants knew very little about them. In a brief lecture, only few students from Germany knew about them. They had less of an impact on students who already knew them than on those who did not. However, engineers were unaware of them and are able to limit their effects. That implies that they can manage cognitive biases' effects without being aware of them. Therefore, experience is another crucial element in lessening the impact of biases. The behavior can also impact how much cognitive biases influence decision-making. Culture and environment affect the way of thinking. Although the finding suggests that knowledge is not the primary element in decreasing the impact of heuristics and cognitive biases, it is still vital to explain and further study the level of knowledge and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer to determine how they may have an impact.

Keywords

Decision makingHeuristic decision and cognitive biasesEducationCase study
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 3: ICED23 , July 2023 , pp. 3415 - 3422
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Cash, P., Hicks, B. and Culley, S. (2015), “Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice”, Design Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 1–32. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A., Shea, K., Stone, R., Cagan, J., Campbell, M.I., Hernandez, N.V. and Wood, K.L. (2011), “Computer-Based Design Synthesis Research: An Overview”, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 11 No. 2, p. 021003. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.3593409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, J.R.A. and Fadel, G.M. (2009a), “Affordance based design: A relational theory for design”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 13–27. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, J.R.A. and Fadel, G.M. (2009b), “Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 225–239. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0064-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1996), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Berlin. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3581-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlKhars, M., Evangelopoulos, N., Pavur, R., and Kulkarni, S. (2019), “Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: An experimental investigation”, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Vol.12, pp. 263–276. http://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S193092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendul, J., and Zahner, M. (2019), “The Influence of Cognitive Biases in Production Planning and Control: Considering the Human Factor for the Design of Decision Support Systems”, In Rybarczyk, Y. (Ed.), Human 4.0-From Biology to Cybernetic, IntechOpen, London, United kingdom, pp.67.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., and Krieger, H. (2015), “Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy”, Medical Decision Making, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 539–557, https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14547740CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., and Ross, M. (1994), “Exploring the” planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times”, Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 366–381, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, K., and Schade, C. (2007), “Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias”, Journal of business Venturing, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 340–362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursac, N., Tanaiutchawoot, N., Rapp, S., Albers, A., Breitschuh, J., and Eckert, C. (2018), “Decision heuristic in pge-product generation engineering”, In Proceedings of TMCE, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 7-11 May, pp. 385–394.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (1998), “Cognitive repairs: How organizational practices can compensate for individual shortcomings”, Organizational Behavior, Citeseer, Vol. 20, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (2013), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, World Scientific, pp. 99–127, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011), “Thinking, fast and slow”, Macmillan, New York, United States.Google Scholar
Kihlander, I., and Ritzén, S. (2012), “Compatibility before completeness—Identifying intrinsic conflicts in concept decision making for technical systems”, Technovation, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 79–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, J., Wirtz, D., Van Boven, L., and Altermatt, T. W. (2004), “The effort heuristic”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00065-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R., and Redlawsk, D. P. (2001), “Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making”, American journal of political science, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 951–971, https://doi.org/10.2307/2669334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanani, R., Salman, I., Turhan, B., Rodríguez, P., and Ralph, P. (2018), “Cognitive biases in software engineering: a systematic mapping study”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 1318–1339, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2018.2877759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., and Ariely, D. (2012), “The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love”, Journal of consumer psychology, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 453–460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, A. (2014), “The behavioral economics guide 2014”, Behavioral Economics Group, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., and Miles, J. E. (2012), “Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 541–562, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2009), “Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness”, Yale University Press, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Tanaiutchawoot, N., Rapp, S., Bursac, N., and Albers, A. (2018), “IP-Integrated Product Development Project's Decision-Making Leads to Heuristic Behaviour”, In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Stuttgart, Germany, IEEE, 17-20 June, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukpong, N., Saini, P., and Mahmud, A. A. (2011), “Using availability heuristics in game design to introduce children to energy sufficient behaviours at home”, In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, pp. 661–664, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_107Google Scholar