Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:23:30.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating designers’ preferred learning media to design for additive manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Martins Obi ,
Patrick Pradel ,
Matt Sinclair ,
Richard Bibb  and
Mark Evans
Martins Obi*
Affiliation:
Coventry University, United Kingdom
Patrick Pradel
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, United Kingdom
Matt Sinclair
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom
Richard Bibb
Affiliation:
Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom
Mark Evans
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, United Kingdom
*
martins.obi@coventry.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this exploratory study, designers’ preferred learning media in learning to design for Additive Manufacturing was explored. Furthermore, by deploying an online survey questionnaire, factors such as years of experience, and the categories of products designed were explored to understand how they influence designers’ learning media with a response from 201 respondents. The results show that designers have learned how to design for AM through experimentation and present the first step towards developing an appropriate Design for Additive Manufacturing knowledge dissemination approach.

Keywords

design for additive manufacturingdesign knowledgelearning mediaknowledge disseminationdesign practice
Type
Design for Additive Manufacturing
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1779 - 1788
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Blösch-Paidosh, A. and Shea, K. (2019) ‘Design Heuristics for Additive Manufacturing Validated Through a User Study1’, Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 141(4), pp. 1–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4041051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, B. and Guzdial, M. (2010) ‘Learning on the job: Characterizing the programming knowledge and learning strategies of web designers’, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2, pp. 703–712. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. (2015). Designers don't do journals: case studies in the development of research-based resources to support design practice and education. In The value of Design Research. European conference of design conference.Google Scholar
Floriane, L. et al. (2017) ‘Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal’, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. Springer Paris, 11(2), pp. 279–288. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0314-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonassen, D. H. (1994) ‘Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers’, IT Forum Paper, 1, pp. 67–80. Available at: http://aurorem.free.fr/partiels/sem7/cours/textesprincipaux/ITForum_Paper1_jonassen.pdf.Google Scholar
Kumke, M. et al. (2016) ‘Methods and tools for identifying and leveraging additive manufacturing design potentials’, Springer. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12008-017-0399-7.Google Scholar
Laverne, Floriane; Segonds, Frederic; D'Antonio, Gianluca; Le Coq Marc, M. (2016) ‘Enriching design with X through tailored additive manufacturing knowledge: a methodological proposal’, Springer. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12008-016-0314-7.Google Scholar
Cohen, Louis, and Morrison, L. M., K. (2012) Research methods in education, Professional Development in Education. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidin, S. Bin, Campbell, I. and Pei, E. (2012) ‘Development of a design feature database to support design for additive manufacturing’, Assembly Automation, 32(3), pp. 235–244. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01445151211244375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obi, M. U. et al. (2022) ‘A bibliometric analysis of research in design for additive manufacturing’, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 28(5), pp. 967–987. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2020-0291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, R. et al. (2020) ‘Additive creativity: investigating the use of design for additive manufacturing to encourage creativity in the engineering design industry’, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation. Taylor & Francis, 00(00), pp. 1–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1813633.Google Scholar
Pradel, P. et al. (2018a) ‘A framework for mapping design for additive manufacturing knowledge for industrial and product design’, Journal of Engineering Design, 29(6), pp. 291–326. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1483011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradel, P. et al. (2018d) ‘Investigation of design for additive manufacturing in professional design practice’, Journal of Engineering Design, 29(4–5), pp. 165–200. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1454589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradel, P. and Previtali, B. (2012) ‘How Young Furniture Designers Study Manufacturing Technologies’, Incorporating Disciplinary Dynamics into Design Education, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Qi, Q. et al. (2018) ‘A categorical framework for formalising knowledge in additive manufacturing’, Procedia CIRP, 75, pp. 87–91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, Uz, et al, U. K.. (2018) ‘Integrated design-oriented framework for Resource Selection in Additive Manufacturing’, Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 70, pp. 96–101. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valjak, F. and Bojčetić, N. (2019) ‘Conception of design principles for additive manufacturing’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-August, (pp. 689–698. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaneker, T. et al. (2020) ‘Design for additive manufacturing: Framework and methodology’, CIRP Annals. Elsevier Ltd, 69(2), pp. 578–599. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watschke, H. et al. (2019) ‘A methodical approach to support conceptual design for multi-material additive manufacturing’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-August pp. 659–668. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, S. et al. (2014) ‘Can experienced designers learn from new tools? A case study of idea generation in a professional engineering team’, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation. Taylor & Francis, pp. 82–96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.832016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar