Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:57:53.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model-Based Effect-Chain Analysis for Complex Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

I. Gräßler
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
D. Wiechel*
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
A.-S. Koch
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
D. Preuß
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany
C. Oleff
Affiliation:
Heinz Nixdorf Institute, Paderborn University, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Effect chain modeling approaches are applied to model cause-effect relations and analyze affected elements and dependencies. In this paper a systematic literature research is conducted to derive main characteristics and limitations of existing approaches. Then, the Model-based Effect Chain Analysis (MECA) method is introduced. Evaluation proves applicability of the method by means of a case example. This is done in the context of a project with a German automotive company. In the project 66 workshops were conducted to model certification-compliant effect chains in accordance to the UN ECE 156.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Albers, A.; Zingel, C. (2013): "Challenges of Model-Based Systems Engineering: A Study towards Unified Term Understanding and the State of Usage of SysML.” In: Michael Abramovici and Rainer Stark (Hg.): Smart Product Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 8392. 10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_9Google Scholar
Alt, O. (2012 ): Modell-basierte Systementwicklung mit SysML. In der Praxis. Hanser, Carl, München.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M.; Mubeen, S. (2018 - 2018): Timing Analysis Driven Design-Space Exploration of Cause-Effect Chains in Automotive Systems. In: IECON 2018: IEEE, pp. 40904095.Google Scholar
Blessing, L. T. M.; Chakrabarti, A. (2009): DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Vol. 1. Springer, Surrey.Google Scholar
Broy, M.; Reichart, G.; Rothhardt, L. (2011): Architekturen softwarebasierter Funktionen im Fahrzeug: von den Anforderungen zur Umsetzung. In: Informatik Spektrum Vol 34 No. 1, pp. 4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, G.; Guo, H.; Tan, R. (2006): Effect and Effect Chain in Functional Design. In: Kesheng Wang, George L. Kovacs, Michael Wozny and Minglun Fang (Hg.): Knowledge Enterprise: Intelligent Strategies in Product Design, Manufacturing, and Management, Vol. 207: Springer US, pp. 412420.Google Scholar
Chamas, M. W.; Paetzold, K. (2018): Modeling of Requirement-Based Effect Chains of Mechatronic Systems in Conceptual Stage. In: IJEETC, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 127134. 10.18178/ijeetc.7.3.127-134Google Scholar
Clarkson, P. J.; Simons, C.; Eckert, C. (2004): Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design. In: J. Mech. Des. Vol 126 No. 5, pp. 788797. 10.1115/1.1765117Google Scholar
Danilovic, M.; Browning, T. R. (2007): Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 25 No. 3Google Scholar
Delligatti, L. (2014): SysML distilled. A brief guide to the systems modeling language. Addison-Wesley, NJ.Google Scholar
Dobrusskin, C. (2016): On the Identification of Contradictions Using Cause Effect Chain Analysis. In: Procedia CIRP 39, pp. 221224. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eger, T.; Eckert, C. M.; Clarkson, P. J. (2007): Engineering Change Analysis during Ongoing Product Development. In: ICED (Hg.): DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, ICED, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Estefan, J. A. (2008): Survey of model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies. Focus Group 25.8. INCOSE MBSE initiative.Google Scholar
Feilhauer, M. (2018): Simulationsgestützte Absicherung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen. University Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Frei, N. (2000): Programm zur Auslegung mechanischer Wirkketten. In: DFX 2000: Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Design for X. Schnaittach/Erlangen, S. 7176.Google Scholar
Friedenthal, Sa.; Moore, A.; Steiner, R. (2008): A practical guide to SysML. The systems modeling language. Burlington, Mass.: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann. 10.1016/C2013-0-14457-1Google Scholar
Gräßler, I. (2015): Implementation-oriented synthesis of mechatronic reference models. In: Torsten Bertram (Hg.): Fachtagung Mechatronik 2015. VDI Mechatronik. Dortmund, 12.03.-13.03. Aachen: Institut für Getriebetechnik and Maschinendynamik, pp. 167172. 10.31224/osf.io/xspbmGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I.; Oleff, C.; Preuß, D. (2022): Proactive Management of Requirement Changes in the Development of Complex Technical Systems. In: Applied Sciences Vol 12 No. 4, pp. 1874.Google Scholar
Gräßler, I.; Wiechel, D. (2021): Systematische Bewertung von Auswirkungsanalysen des Engineering Change Managements. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X (DFX2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I.; Wiechel, D.; Pottebaum, J. (2021): Role model of model-based systems engineering application. In: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1097 (1), p. 12003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackl, J.; Krause, D. (2017): Towards an impact model of modular product structures. In: DS 87-3 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 3: Product, Services and Systems Design, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08.2017, pp. 151160.Google Scholar
Hamraz, B. (2013): Engineering change modelling using a function-behaviour-structure scheme. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. 10.17863/CAM.14061Google Scholar
Hamraz, B.; Caldwell, N. H. M.; Clarkson, P. J. (2013): A Holistic Categorization Framework for Literature on Engineering Change Management. In: Syst. Engin. Vol 16 No. 4, pp. 473505.Google Scholar
Hick, H.; Bajzek, M.; Faustmann, C. (2019): Definition of a system model for model-based development. In: SN Appl. Sci. Vol 1 No. 9. 10.1007/s42452-019-1069-0Google Scholar
International Council on Systems Engineering (2007): Systems Engineering Vision 2020. INCOSE.Google Scholar
Jayatilleke, S.; Lai, R. (2018): A systematic review of requirements change management. In: Information and Software Technology 93, pp. 163185. 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.09.004Google Scholar
Kaiser, B.; Klaas, V.; Schulz, S.; Herbst, C.; Lascych, P. (2010): Integrating System Modelling with Safety Activities. In: David, Hutchison et al. (Hg.): Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, Bd. 6351. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 452–465. 10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_33Google Scholar
Kirova, V.; Kirby, N.; Kothari, D.; Childress, Glenda (2008): Effective requirements traceability: Models, tools, and practices. In: Bell Labs Tech. J. Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 143157. 10.1002/bltj.20272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, T.; Münzenberger, R. (2010): Modellierung and Echtzeitanalyse komplexer Wirkketten in Fahrerassistenzsystemen. In: 3. AutoTest, FKFS, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lee, M.-G,; Chechurin, L.; Lenyashin, V. (2018): Introduction to cause-effect chain analysis plus with an application in solving manufacturing problems. In: Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99 (9-12), pp. 21592169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machi, L. A.; McEvoy, B. T. (2012): The literature review. 2. ed. Corwin, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.; Holtmann, J.; Meyer, M. (2011): Formalisierung von Anforderungen and Betriebssystemeigenschaften zur frühzeitigen Simulation von eingebetteten, automobilen Systemen. In: 8. Paderborner Workshop Entwurf mechatronischer Systeme, Verlagsschriftenreihe des Heinz Nixdorf Instituts, Vol. 294, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Object Management Group (2004): OMG: Unified Modeling Language Infrastructure Specification, Version 2.0.Google Scholar
Object Management Group (2019): OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML™).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Nicholas (2020): Durchgängiges Vorgehensmodell zur Anforderungserfassung für die Entwicklung mechatronischer Systeme im Automobil. UB-PAD - Paderborn University Library.Google Scholar
Schwede, L.-N.; Hanna, M.; Wortmann, N.; Krause, D. (2019): Consistent Modelling of the Impact Model of Modular Product Structures with Linking Boundary Conditions in SysML. In: Proceedings of the Design Society International Conference on Engineering Design Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 36013610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, M.; Yin, G.; Wang, H.; Ni, J. (2010 - 2010): Effect-Oriented Function Analysis and Testing Method. In: 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet Computing for Science and Engineering. 2010 (ICICSE). Harbin, China, 01.11.2010 - 02.11.2010: IEEE, pp. 3438. 10.1109/ICICSE.2010.37Google Scholar
UNECE (2021): UN Regulation No. 156 - Software update and software update management system.Google Scholar
Guideline, VDI 2221:2019 (2019): VDI 2221 Design of technical products and systems.Google Scholar
Walden, D. D.; Roedler, G. J.; Forsberg, K.; Hamelin, R. D.; Shortell, T. M. (2015): Systems engineering handbook. Vol. 4. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Weilkiens, T. (2014): Systems Engineering with SysML/UML. dpunkt, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Zhao, X. (2017): The Integration of Model-Based Safety Analysis and Model-Based Systems Engineering at an Early Stage. In: JSST Vol. 10 No. 1. 10.13034/jsst.v10i1.163CrossRefGoogle Scholar