Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:39:53.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Navigating complexity: visualising sustainable product development knowledge through dynamic heatmaps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Gerald Kremer ,
Sarah Aboumorra  and
Rainer Stark
Gerald Kremer*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Sarah Aboumorra
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Rainer Stark
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
*
kremer@tu-berlin.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper presents a novel approach to visualize the impacts of design heuristics in sustainable product development. Focusing on the integration of ecological sustainability, our research introduces a multivariate visual approach, combining Sunburst Charts and Radial Heat Maps. The methodology, based on a description standard for design heuristics, enhances knowledge sharing and provides an intuitive tool for designers. A dynamic three-series radial heatmap facilitates comparisons across different product properties, fostering informed decision-making in product development.

Keywords

product developmentvisualisationdesign heuristicsknowledge-based engineering (KBE)sustainable design
Type
Design for Sustainability
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1349 - 1358
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Al-Kodmany, Kheir (2001): Visualization Tools and Methods for Participatory Planning and Design. In: Journal of Urban Technology 8 (2), S. 1–37. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106307301316904772.Google Scholar
Bobek, Eliza; Tversky, Barbara (2016): Creating visual explanations improves learning. In: Cognitive research: principles and implications 1 (1), S. 27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6.Google ScholarPubMed
Bonvoisin, Jérémy; Buchert, Tom; Stark, Rainer (2018): FORMAL SYSTEM for THE EXPRESSION OF TARGET-ORIENTED DESIGN HEURISTICS. In: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. 15th International Design Conference, May, 21-24, 2018: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Croatia; The Design Society, Glasgow, UK (Design Conference Proceedings), S. 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchert, T.; Pförtner, A.; Bonvoisin, J.; Lindow, K.; Stark, R.: MODEL-BASED SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. In: INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE, Bd. 2016.Google Scholar
Card, Stuart (2008): Information Visualization. In:, S. 509–543.Google Scholar
Comai, Alessandro (2014): Decision-Making Support. In: World Futures Review 6 (4), S. 477–484. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1946756715569233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danfulani, Babangida; Anwar, Khairul; Khaidzir, Mohamad (2010): Visualization in Design Process.Google Scholar
VDI 2221 Blatt 2, 2019: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme - Modell der Produktentwicklung.Google Scholar
Fu, Katherine K.; Yang, Maria C.; Wood, Kristin L. (2015): Design Principles: The Foundation of Design. In: Volume 7: 27th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 02.08.2015 - 05.08.2015: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Saravia Ortiz-de-Montellano, Cris; Samani, Pouya; van der Meer, Yvonne (2023): How can the circular economy support the advancement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? A comprehensive analysis. In: Sustainable Production and Consumption 40, S. 352–362. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigliotti, Massimo; Schmidt-Traub, Guido; Bastianoni, Simone (2019): The Sustainable Development Goals. In: Encyclopedia of Ecology: Elsevier, S. 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heer, J.; Shneiderman, Ben; Park, C. (2012): A taxonomy of tools that support the fluent and flexible use of visualizations. In: Interact. Dyn. Vis. Anal 10, S. 1–26.Google Scholar
Hwang, Dongwook; Park, Woojin (2018): Design heuristics set for X: A design aid for assistive product concept generation. In: Design Studies 58, S. 89–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, Gerald; Peters, Ina; Bingoel, Berkay; Stark, Rainer (2023): Better Design through Shared Knowledge via Design Heuristics. In: Procedia CIRP 119, S. 957–962. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, Gerald; Peters, Ina; Stark, Rainer: Digital Capture of Design Heuristics to Represent Sustainability Knowledge in Product Design. In: 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, Bd. 2023. Online verfügbar unter https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1510&context=isd2014.Google Scholar
Kremer, Gerald; Peters, Ina; Stark, Rainer (22 and 2022): Introduction of a standardized Notation of Design Heuristics for Knowledge Formalization. In: DS 119: Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X (DFX2022). Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium Design for X, 22 and 23 September 2022: The Design Society, S. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, Gerald: Design Heuristics for Sustainable Product Development; doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-18868Google Scholar
Laszlo, Chris (2011): Embedded Sustainability. The Next Big Competitive Advantage. 1st ed. Saltaire: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Mattmann, I.; Gramlich, S.; Kloberdanz, H.: MAPPING REQUIREMENTS TO PRODUCT PROPERTIES: THE MAPPING MODEL. In: DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference 2016.Google Scholar
Michalos, M.; Tselenti, P.; Nalmpantis, S. L. (2012): Visualization Techniques for Large Datasets. In: JESTR 5 (1), S. 72–76. https://dx.doi.org/10.25103/jestr.051.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikosch, Natalia; Dettmer, Tina; Plaga, Benjamin; Gernuks, Marko; Finkbeiner, Matthias (2022): Relevance of Impact Categories and Applicability of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods from an Automotive Industry Perspective. In: Sustainability 14 (14), S. 8837. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14148837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, Nicolas; Krause, Dieter (2016): A Method for Designing Visualisations as Product Development Tools.Google Scholar
Quernheim, Niklas; Winter, Sven; Arnemann, Lars; Wolff, Steffen; Anderl, Reiner; Schleich, Benjamin (2023): Method Set for an adaptable Sustainability Assessment along the Product Life Cycle. In: Procedia CIRP 116, S. 498–503. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneiderman, Ben; Plaisant, Catherine; Cohen, M.; Jacobs, S. (2009): Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computerinteraction. In: IDJ 17, S. 157–158. https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/idj.17.2.14mar.Google Scholar
Sohnius, Felix; Iglauer, Martin; Gussen, Lars C.; Schmitt, Robert H. (2023): Quantification of sustainability in production systems through a conceptual input-output model. In: Procedia CIRP 118, S. 1016–1021. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, Nam P. (1990): The principles of design. New York: Oxford Univ. Press (Oxford series on advanced manufacturing, 6). Online verfügbar unter http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0602/88019584-d.html.Google Scholar
Telenko, Cassandra; O'Rourke, Julia; Seepersad, Carolyn; Webber, Michael (2016): A Compilation of Design for Environment Guidelines. In: Journal of Mechanical Design 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. (2001): The visual display of Quantitative Informatin. second edition: Graphics Press. Online verfügbar unter https://faculty.salisbury.edu/∼jtanderson/teaching/cosc311/fa21/files/tufte.pdf.Google Scholar
Weber, Christian; Werner, Horst; Deubel, Till (2003): A different view on Product Data Management/Product Life-Cycle Management and its future potentials. In: Journal of Engineering Design 14 (4), S. 447–464. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544820310001606876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, JoAnne; Murphy, Craig (2019): Engineering rules. Global standard setting since 1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (Hagley library studies in business, technology, and politics).Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Seda; Daly, Shanna R.; Seifert, Colleen M.; Gonzalez, Richard (2015): How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines. In: Des. Sci. 1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2015.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan Fu, Qiu; Ping Chui, Yoon; Helander, Martin G. (2006): Knowledge identification and management in product design. In: Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (6), S. 50–63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270610709215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar