Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T01:21:08.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PREVENTING THE OVERCONSUMPTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFILL AT HOME FAST-MOVING CONSUMER GOODS – INTERVENTIONS THAT SUPPORT CIRCULAR CONSUMER JOURNEYS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Catriona Tassell*
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Marco Aurisicchio
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
*
Tassell, Catriona, Imperial College London, United Kingdom, c.tassell19@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Context and problem: Reuse is positioned as a strategy capable of countering single-use overconsumption and disposal. For refill at home FMCGs, consumers are responsible for carrying out behaviours that enable this, such as keeping and using products for a prolonged period. However, it is not known if consumers actually fulfil these responsibilities. Aim: This research aims to understand the extent to which consumer reuse behaviours supports the intended reduction in impact and, if not, consider how best to improve it. Method: In-depth interviews with 15 consumers were conducted where the behaviour chain method was used to map resource journeys for 31 refill at home offerings. Results: Five models of consumer behaviour increased the impact of reuse. The critical moments which led consumers to carry out these behaviours were identified, uncovering intervention areas. Conclusions: The behaviour models and critical moments offer a first attempt to systematically analyse how and where actual consumer behaviour can increase the impact of refill at home FMCGs. The results call for focussed interventions across the consumer journey that support reuse components as part of a system.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Bashir, H. et al. (2020) “Experimenting with sustainable business models in fast moving consumer goods”, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 270, p. 122302. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethurem, M., Choate, B. and Bramwell, S. (2021) “Stop piling on: Assessing efforts to reduce single-use water bottles at allegheny college”, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168864.Google Scholar
Blomsma, F. and Brennan, G. (2017) “The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity”, Journal of Industrial Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, 21(3), pp. 603614. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changwichan, K. and Gheewala, S. H. (2020) “Choice of materials for takeaway beverage cups towards a circular economy”, Sustainable Production and Consumption. Elsevier B.V., 22, pp. 3444. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2019) “Reuse - Rethinking Packaging”, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, pp. 143.Google Scholar
Greenwood, S. C. et al. (2021) “Many Happy Returns: Combining insights from the environmental and behavioural sciences to understand what is required to make reusable packaging mainstream”, Sustainable Production and Consumption. Elsevier B.V., 27, pp. 16881702. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hait, A. and Powers, S. E. (2019) “The value of reusable feminine hygiene products evaluated by comparative environmental life cycle assessment”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Elsevier, 150(July 2018), p. 104422. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, M. B. (1994) “Reusable and disposable cups: An energy-based evaluation”, Environmental Management, 18(6), pp. 889899. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02393618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, N. et al. (2019) “Mapping & Classifying Business Models To Replace Single-Use Packaging in the Food & Beverage Industry: a Strategic Design Tool”, The Learning Network on Sustainability, pp. 418423.Google Scholar
Miller, J., Bennett, C. and Cumming, G. (2011) “Potentially changing health behaviour using nappy “nudges””, British Journal of Midwifery, 19(4), pp. 246251. https://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.4.246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muranko, Z. et al. (2020) “Behaviour chains in circular consumption systems: the reuse of FMCGs”, IS4CE 2020 Conference of the International Society for the Circular Economy, (July).Google Scholar
Muranko, Ż., et al. (2021) “Characterisation and environmental value proposition of reuse models for fast-moving consumer goods: Reusable packaging and products”, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), pp. 135. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13052609.Google Scholar
Poortinga, W. and Whitaker, L. (2018) “Promoting the use of reusable coffee cups through environmental messaging, the provision of alternatives and financial incentives”, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10030873.Google Scholar
Tassell, C. and Aurisicchio, M. (2020) “The Evolution of Reuse and Recycling Behaviours: An Integrative Review with Application to the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Industry”, International Society for the Circular Economy, (June).Google Scholar
The Ellen McCarthur Foundation (2013) Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: an economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition.Google Scholar
UK Government (2011) Guidance on Applying the Waste Hierarchy, Department for Environment Food and Rrual Affairs.Google Scholar
Woods, L. and Bakshi, B. R. (2014) “Reusable vs. disposable cups revisited: Guidance in life cycle comparisons addressing scenario, model, and parameter uncertainties for the US consumer”, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(4), pp. 931940. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0697-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeuw van der Laan, A. and Aurisicchio, M. (2019) “Archetypical consumer roles in closing the loops of resource flows for Fast-Moving Consumer Goods”, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier LtdRefill, 236, p. 117475. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar