Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T12:12:37.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chilled disks in ultraluminous X-ray sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Roberto Soria
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, 60 Garden st, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA email: rsoria@cfa.harvard.edu
Zdenka Kuncic
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia email:z.kuncic@physics.usyd.edu.au
Anabela C. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
LUTH, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, 5 Place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France email: anabela.darbon@obspm.fr CAAUL, Observatorio Astronomico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, Portugal
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

If the standard disk-blackbody approximation is used to estimate black hole (BH) masses in ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs), the inferred masses are ∼ 1000 M. However, we argue that such an approximation cannot be applied to ULXs, because their disks are only radiating a small fraction of the accretion power, and are therefore cooler than they would be in a thermal-dominant state, for a given BH mass. Instead, we suggest that a different phenomenological approximation should be used, based on three observable parameters: disk luminosity, peak temperature, and ratio between thermal and non-thermal emission. This method naturally predicts masses ∼ 50 M, more consistent with other theoretical and observational constraints.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Fabian, A. C., Ross, R. R. & Miller, J. M. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J., King, A. & Raine, D. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, A. C. & Soria, R. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuncic, Z. & Bicknell, G. V. 2004, AJ, 616, 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makishima, K. et al. 1986, AJ, 308, 635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., Fabian, A. C. & Miller, M. C. 2004, ApJ, 614, L117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337.Google Scholar