Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:17:55.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of secular resonances on the long-term orbital evolution of uncontrolled near-Earth objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

T. V. Bordovitsyna ,
I. V. Tomilova  and
G. O. Ryabova
T. V. Bordovitsyna
Affiliation:
Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russian Federation email: tvbord@sibmail.com
I. V. Tomilova
Affiliation:
Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russian Federation email: tvbord@sibmail.com
G. O. Ryabova
Affiliation:
Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russian Federation email: tvbord@sibmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A set of 29 low order secular resonance relations in the near-Earth satellite dynamics has been obtained and their influence on dynamic evolution of objects has been investigated on time intervals of 100 years. The analysis of the results shows that secular resonances are very common phenomena in the near-Earth orbital space. Sharp resonances are concentrated in the orbital space areas where the semi-major axes a ⩾ 20000 km and the inclinations i ⩾ 50○. In some areas objects have several secular resonances. The superposition of several secular resonances or orbital and secular resonances are the source of randomness in the motion of objects.

Keywords

celestial mechanicsmethods: analyticalmethods: numerical
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S310: Complex Planetary Systems , July 2014 , pp. 176 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Bordovitsyna, T. V.et al. 2009, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz. 52 10/2, 5 (in Russian)Google Scholar
Bordovitsyna, T. V., Tomilova, I. V., & Chuvashov, I. N. 2012, Solar System Research. 46 5, 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordovitsyna, T. V., Tomilova, I. V., & Chuvashov, I. N. 2014, Solar System Research. 48 4, 259Google Scholar
Bordovitsyna, T. V. & Tomilova, I. V. 2014a, Russian Physical Journal., 57, 516Google Scholar
Bordovitsyna, T. V. & Tomilova, I. V. 2014b, Russian Physical Journal., 57, 819Google Scholar
Breiter, S. 1999, Cel. Mech. and Dyn. Astr., 74, 253Google Scholar
Chao, C. & Gick, R. 2004, Adv. Space Res., 34, 1221Google Scholar
Cincotta, P. M., Girdano, C. M., & Simo, C. 2003, Physica, 182, 151Google Scholar
Cook, G. E. 1962, Geophys. Journ. of RAS. 6 3, 271Google Scholar
Hughes, S. 1980, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 372, 243Google Scholar
Hughes, S. 1981, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 375, 379Google Scholar
Rossi, A. 2008, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 100, 267Google Scholar