Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:57:16.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconstruction of the transit signal in the presence of stellar variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Aude Alapini
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, United Kingdom email: alapini@astro.ex.ac.uk, suz@astro.ex.ac.uk
Suzanne Aigrain
Affiliation:
Astrophysics Group, School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, United Kingdom email: alapini@astro.ex.ac.uk, suz@astro.ex.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Intrinsic stellar variability can hinder the detection of shallow transits, particularly in space-based data. Therefore, this variability has to be filtered out before running the transit search. Unfortunately, filtering out the low frequency signal of the stellar variability also modifies the transit shape. This results in errors in the measured transit depth and duration used to derive the planet radius, and orbital inclination. We present an evaluation of the magnitude of this effect based on 20 simulated light curves from the CoRoT blind exercise 2 (BT2). We then present an iterative filter which uses the strictly periodic nature of the transits to separate them from other forms of variability, so as to recover the original transit shape before deriving the planet parameters. On average with this filter, we improve the estimation of the transit depth and duration by 15% and 10% respectively.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Aigrain, S. 2005, PhD Thesis, Cambridge, UK, http://www.astro.ex.ac.uk/people/suz/docs/thesis/Google Scholar
Aigrain, S. & Irwin, M. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, G., Bakos, G., & Noyes, R. W. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moutou, C., Pont, F., Barge, P. et al. 2005, A&A, 437, 355Google Scholar
Seager, S., Kuchner, M., Hier-Majumder, C. A., & Militzer, B. 2007, ApJ, 669, 1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar