Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T03:21:29.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Saturation of MRI via parasitic modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

Martin E. Pessah*
Affiliation:
Niels Bohr International AcademyNiels Bohr Institute, University of CopenhagenBlegdamsvej 17, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark Institute for Advanced StudyEinstein Drive, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA email: mpessah@nbi.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Understanding the physical mechanisms that play a role in the saturation of the magnetorotational instability (MRI) has been an outstanding problem in accretion physics since the early 90's. Here, we present the summary of a study of the parasitic modes that feed off exact viscous, resistive MRI modes. We focus on the situation in which the amplitude of the magnetic field produced by the MRI is such that the instantaneous growth rate of the fastest parasitic mode matches that of the fastest MRI mode. We argue that this "saturation" amplitude provides an estimate of the magnetic field that can be generated by the MRI before the secondary instabilities suppress its growth significantly. We show that there exist two regimes, delimited by a critical Elsasser number of order unity, in which saturation is achieved via secondary instabilities that correspond to either Kelvin-Helmholtz or tearing modes.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, J. & Xu, G. 1994, ApJ, 432, 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamroz, B., Julien, K., & Knobloch, E. 2008, PhST, 132, 4027Google Scholar
Latter, H. N., Lesaffre, P., & Balbus, S. A. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longaretti, P. Y. & Lesur, G. 2010, A&A, 516, 51Google Scholar
Pessah, M. E. & Chan, C. K. 2008, ApJ, 684, 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessah, M. E. & Goodman, J. 2009, ApJ, 698, L72Google Scholar
Pessah, M. E. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, T., Inutsuka, S. I., & Miyama, S. M. 1998, ApJ, 506, L57Google Scholar
Sano, T. & Stone, J. M. 2002, ApJ, 577, 534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umurhan, O. M., Regev, O., & Menou, K. 2007, Phys. Rev. E, 76, 6310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishniac, E. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar