Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:22:51.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An historical perspective: the development of methods for assessing nutrient requirements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Sir Kenneth Blaxter
Affiliation:
Stradbroke Hall, Stradbroke, Suffolk IP21 5HH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Assessing Responses to Nutrients by Ruminants’
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Animals no. 2, Ruminants. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Armsby, H. P. (1917). The Nutrition of Farm Animals. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1969). In Handbuch der Tiemahrung, vol. 1, p. 385. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J., McNally, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1944). Journal of Experimental Biology 20, 120.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, pp. 183197 [Lewis, D., editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1966). The George Scott Robertson Memorial Lecture. Belfast: The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1977). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 169177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1980). Annales de Zootechnie 29, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. (1985). In Nutritional Adaptation in Man, p. 89 [Blaxter, K. and Waterlow, J. C., editors]. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
Boussingault, J. B. (1843). Economie Rurale Consideree dans les Rapports avec la Chimie, la Physique et la Meteorologie. Paris: Bechet.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. (1972). Dairy Science Abstracts 34, 265288.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Broster, V. J. (1984). Journal of Dairy Research 51, 149196.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, T. L. (1959). Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock, p. 81. London: Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications.Google Scholar
Eskedal, W. (1954). In Festschrift 100 Jahre Mockrn, p. 219 [Nehring, K., editor]. Berlin: Deutsche Akademie für Landwirtschaft.Google Scholar
Fick, A. & Wisclicenus, F. J. (1856). Philosophical Magazine 31, 159.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B. (1933). Science 77, 306.Google Scholar
France, J. & Thornley, J. H. M. (1984). Mathematical Models in Agriculture. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Geay, Y. (1984). Journal of Animal Science 58, 766788.Google Scholar
Gill, M., Thornley, J. H. M., Black, J. L. & Beever, D. E. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 621649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grouven, H. (1858). Vortrage uber Agriculturchemie. Cologne: W. Hassel.Google Scholar
Haecker, T. L. (1907). University of Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin no. 79.Google Scholar
Henneberg, W. & Stohmann, F. (1860). Beitrage zur Begrundung einer rationelle Futterung der Wiederkauer. Braunschweig: C. S. Schweschte.Google Scholar
Henneberg, W. & Stohmann, F. (1870). Neue Beitrage zur Begrundung einer rationelle Futterung der Wiederkauer. Berlin.Google Scholar
Henry, W. A. (1898). Feeds and Feeding. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L., Schiemann, R. & Nehring, K. (1962). Archiv für Tierernährung 11, 337358.Google Scholar
Kellner, O. (1908). Grundzuge der Futterungslehre. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Klieber, M., Regan, W. M. & Mead, S. W. (1941). Hilgardia 16, 511562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriss, M. (1942). Journal of Animal Science 2, 6379.Google Scholar
Kuhn, G. (1894). Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsstationen 44, 257.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. B. & Gilbert, J. H. (1853). Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Scotland; and Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland (1975). Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1934). Science 80, 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1947). Feeds and Feeding. New York: Morrison Publishing Co. (This is the 20th edition of Henry, 1898.)Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Allen, D. M. (1966 a). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 295305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Allen, D. M. (1966 b). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 509517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Allen, D. M. (1966 c). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 519532.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Smith, J. S., Webster, A. J. F. & Corrigall, W. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 541551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1962). Proceedings of Cornell Symposium on Animal Nutrition, p. 54.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. (1975). Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 45, 111.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F., Reynolds, P. J. & Moe, P. W. (1976). Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association for Animal Production Publication no. 19, pp. 57–60.Google Scholar
von Liebig, J. (1840). Thierchemie in ihre Anwenung auf Physiologie und Pathologie. Braunschweig: Friedrich Beiweg und Spene.Google Scholar
Woolff, E. (1874). Die rationelle Futterung der Landwirtschaftlichen Nutztiere. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Yates, F., Boyd, D. A. & Pettit, G. H. N. (1942). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 32, 428456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (1793). Annals of Agriculture 19, 436.Google Scholar
Zuntz, N. & Hagemann, D. (1898). Landwirtschaflche Jahrbücher 27, 1.Google Scholar