Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T10:56:10.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bridging the gap between science and food policy: nutrition as a driver of policy drawing on Scotland as a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2024

Margaret Gill*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Kieran Fowler
Affiliation:
Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Ashgrove Road West, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
E Marian Scott
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University Place, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Margaret Gill, email: m.gill@abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

Access to adequate food is one of the Human Rights set out in international law and hence its delivery (through policy) is the role of government. ‘Food policy’ cannot be the role of a single government department, however, since regulations must take care of public goods (e.g. public health and protecting the natural environment) while also creating an economic environment attractive to private sector participation. From the mid-20th century, much of food policy was driven by a need to encourage the production base, but more recently the importance of considering food policy through the lens of nutritional requirements is increasingly recognised, alongside the importance of minimising environmental damage. This review paper draws on experience of working with policymakers (in particular the Scottish Government) and of active participation in an EC-commissioned project. It highlights the need for the research community to invest time and resources in understanding what evidence policymakers are asking for and to consider that alongside evidence from those who will be impacted by the policy (stakeholders). Examples of effective ways of engaging stakeholders and policy communities simultaneously are outlined and the paper provides some thoughts on the boundaries between the science and policy communities and how to bridge them. The Case Study also highlights the importance of evidence to inform prioritisation and consultation at a local level when aiming to meet multiple policy goals nationally.

Type
Conference on ‘Diet and Health Inequalities’
Copyright
© University of Glasgow and the Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2010) The Right to Adequate Food. Available at https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/FactSheet34en.pdf (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar
Friel, S, Schram, A & Townsend, B (2020) The nexus between international trade, food systems, malnutrition and climate change. Nat Food 1, 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D & Clark, M (2015) Food, agriculture & the environment: can we feed the world & save the earth? Daedalus 144, 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, BM (2017) Relationship between shifts in food system dynamics and acceleration of the global nutrition transition, Nutr Revs 75, 7382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Kingdom Food Security Report (2021) Theme 2: UK Food Supply Sources; available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021-theme-2-uk-food-supply-sources (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar
Gill, M & Johnston, K (2010) Informing food policy: balancing the evidence. Proc Nutr Soc 69, 621627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fit4Food2030 (2018) Tools for Transformation; available at https://knowledgehub.fit4food2030.eu/tools-for-transformation/ (accessed July 2023).Google Scholar
Scottish Science Advisory Council (2023) https://scottishscience.org.uk/scottish-science-advisory-council (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2022) Good Food Nation (Scotland) Act 2022; available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2022/5/contents/enacted (accessed July 2023).Google Scholar
Bhunnoo, R & Poppy, GM (2020) A national approach for the transformation of UK food system. Nat Food 1, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliai, G, Dinu, M, Madarena, MP (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125 308318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defraeye, T, Tagliavini, G, Wentao, Wu et al (2019) Digital twins probe into food cooling and biochemical quality changes for reducing losses in refrigerated supply chains, Resour Conserv Recycl 149, 778794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylianidis, C, Osinga, S & Athanasiadis, IN (2021) Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 84, 105942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M, de Boer, ACL, Kok, PCW et al. (2028). A systems approach to research and innovation for food system transformation. Published by FIT4FOOD2030; available at https://fit4food2030.eu/eu-think-tank-policy-brief/ (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar
Wepner, B (2019) Mapping of trends in food systems and related R&I policy frameworks. Available at https://fit4food2030.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FIT4FOOD2030_D2.2_Report-on-overview-of-needs-barriers-and-enablers-for-policies-and-governance….pdf (accessed July 2023).Google Scholar
Chen, X, Zhang, Z, Yang, H et al. (2020) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Nutr J 19, 8696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagliai, G,Dinu, M, Madarena, MP et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit J Nutr 125, 308318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, S, Dhuria, P, Ro, E et al. (2023) UK government’s new placement legislation is a ‘good first step’: a rapid qualitative analysis of consumer, business, enforcement and health stakeholder perspectives. BMC Med 21, 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M, Cahill, J, Callenius, C et al. (2020). Governance of research to accelerate innovation, deliver transformation and demonstrate flexibility at the time of shocks. Published by FIT4FOOD2030; available at https://fit4food2030.eu/eu-think-tank-policy-brief/ (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar
Scottish Government (2022) Executive Summary - Local food for everyone: consultation analysis - gov.scot (www.gov.scot) (accessed October 2023).Google Scholar
Reid, M (2011) Behind the “glasgow effect”. Bull World Health Organ 89, 706707.Google ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R (2016) Migration, education and employment: socio-cultural factors in shaping individual decisions and economic outcomes in Orkney and Shetland. Isl Stud J 11, 177192.Google Scholar
Audit Scotland (2023) Local government in Scotland; available at https://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/uploads/docs/report/2023/nr_230517_local_government_overview.pdf (accessed August 2023).Google Scholar