Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T21:09:07.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The case for fortified flour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

D. W. Kent-Jones
Affiliation:
The Laboratories, Dudden Hill Lane, Willesden, London, N.W. 10
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Flour and Bread
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1958

References

Frazer, A. C., Hickman, J. R., Sammons, H. G. & Sharratt, M. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Great Britain. Parliament (1945). Report of the Conference on the Post-War Loaf. [Cmd. 6701]. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Great Britain. Parliament (1956). Report of the Panel on Composition and Nutritive Value of Flour [Cmd. 9757]. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Kent-Jones, D. W. (1946). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 4, 14.Google Scholar
Kent-Jones, D. W. (19491950). J. R . Soc. Arts, 98, 150.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Widdowson, E. M. (1956). Breads White and Brown. London: Pitman Medical Publishing Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Moore, T., Sharman, I. M. & Ward, R. J. (1957). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 8, 97.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1954). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 287.Google Scholar
Wilder, R. M. (1949). Canad. med. Ass. J. 60, 329.Google Scholar
Wilder, R. M. (1956). J. Amer. med. Ass. 162, 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar