Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:51:34.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chronic copper toxicity of ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

J. R. Todd*
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Veterinary Research Laboratories, Stormont, Belfast, BT4 3SD
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There has been an active interest in the toxicology of copper since the middle of the 19th century and a review by Davenport (1953) covers the early work on the hazard to man and animals of both the acute and chronic forms. Review material specific to chronic copper poisoning in farm livestock has also been published by Broughton & Hardy (1934), Eden (1940), Todd (1962) and Bull (1964).

The first description of true chronic copper poisoning in farm animals would seem to be that of Mallory (1925) who produced the condition experimentally in sheep. Beijers (1932) described similar symptoms in sheep grazing orchards which had been sprayed with a copper fungicide, and 2 years later Broughton & Hardy (1934) published their detailed experimental investigations showing the dangers of excessive copper intakes to sheep. The similarity between the symptoms described in these reports and those of ‘yellows’ or ‘toxaemic jaundice’ in Australia was recognized (Bull, 1964) and the experiments of Albiston, Bull, Dick & Keast (1940) confirmed that this naturally-occurring condition was of similar origin. The importance of chronic copper poisoning as a nutritional hazard was, therefore, fully established.

Type
Symposium Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1969

References

Albiston, H. E., Bull, L. B., Dick, A. T. & Keast, J. C. (1940). Aust. vet. J. 16, 233.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1940.tb06314.xGoogle Scholar
Barden, P. J. (1962). Copper Metabolism in Farm Animals. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Beijers, J. A. (1932). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 59, 1317.Google Scholar
Bracewell, C. D. (1958). Vet. Rec. 70, 342.Google Scholar
Broughton, I. B. & Hardy, W. T. (1934). Bull. Tex. agric. Exp. Stn no. 499.Google Scholar
Bull, L. B. (1964). The Victorian Veterinary Proceedings July 1964, p. 17.Google Scholar
Bull, L. B., Albiston, H. E., Edgar, G. & Dick, A. T. (1956). Aust. vet. J. 32, 229.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1956.tb05673.xGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, W. E. (1933). Aust. vet. J. 9, 2.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1933.tb03612.xGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. L. Jr, Nelson, S. L., Kidder, R. W., Sippel, W. L. & Kidder, C. W. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 960.10.2527/jas1962.214960xGoogle Scholar
Clegg, F. G. (1956) Vet. Rec. 68, 332.Google Scholar
Cunningham, I. J. (1946). N.Z. Jl Sci. Techol. 27A, 372.Google Scholar
Davenport, S. J. (1953). Inf. Circ. U.S. Bur. Mines no. 7666.Google Scholar
Dick, A. T. (1954). Aust. J. agric. Res. 5, 511.10.1071/AR9540511Google Scholar
Dick, A. T. & Bull, L. B. (1945). Aust. vet. J. 21, 70.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1945.tb04462.xGoogle Scholar
Eden, A. (1940). J. comp. Path., 53, 90.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S. (1943). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 33, 116.10.1017/S0021859600010686Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S., Lewis, A. H. & Watson, S. J. (1938). Nature, Lond. 141, 553.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W. S., Lewis, A. H. & Watson, S. J. (1943). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 33, 44.10.1017/S002185960004836XGoogle Scholar
Gracey, J. F. & Todd, J. R. (1960). Br. vet. J. 116, 405.10.1016/S0007-1935(17)43951-0Google Scholar
Hemingway, R. G. & MacPherson, A. (1967). Vet. Rec., 81, 695.Google Scholar
Kidder, R. W. (1949). J. Anim. Sci. 8, 623.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, T., Pope, A. L. & Sorensen, D. K. (1962). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 141, 362.Google Scholar
McCall, J. T. & Davis, G. K. (1961). J. Nutr, 74, 45.Google Scholar
MacPherson, A. & Hemingway, R. G. (1965). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 16, 220.10.1002/jsfa.2740160408Google Scholar
Mallory, F. B. (1925). Am. J. Path. 1, 117.Google Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1950). In Copper Metabolism, pp. 272, 313. [McElroy, W. D. and Glass, B., editors.] Baltimore, Md: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. F. (1964). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 23, 38.10.1079/PNS19640009Google Scholar
O’Donovan, P. B., Spillane, T. A. & O’Grady, J. F. (1966). Anim. Prod, 8, 333.10.1017/S0003356100034735Google Scholar
Ogilvie, D. D. (1954). Vet. Rec. 66, 279.Google Scholar
O’Moore, L. B. (1956). Irish vet. J. 10, 225.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. K. L. (1956). Vet. Rec. 68, 766.Google Scholar
Pierson, R. E. & Aanes, W. A. (1958). J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 133, 307.Google Scholar
Poole, D. B. R. (1967). Res. Rep. An Foras Talûntais p. 172.Google Scholar
Pryor, W. J. (1959). Aust. vet. J. 35, 366.10.1111/j.1751-0813.1959.tb03697.xGoogle Scholar
Reitz, J. H. (1936). Bull. W. Va agric. Exp. Stn no. 271.Google Scholar
Ross, D. B. (1964). Vet. Rec., 76, 875.Google Scholar
Salvidio, E., Pannacciulli, I. & Tizianello, A. (1963). Nature, Lond. 300, 372.Google Scholar
Senior, V. E. (1959). Can. J. comp. Med. 23, 229.Google Scholar
Shand, A. & Lewis, G. (1957). Vet. Rec. 69, 618.Google Scholar
Sutter, M. D., Rawson, D.C., McKeown, J. A. & Haskell, A. R. (1958). Am. J. vet. Res. 119, 890.Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. (1962). Vet. Bull., Weybridge 32, 573.Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. & Gracey, J. F. (1959). Vet. Rec. 71, 145.Google Scholar
Todd, J. R., Gracey, J. F. & Thompson, R. H. (1962). Br. vet. J. 118, 482.10.1016/S0007-1935(17)42754-0Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. & Gribben, H. J. (1965). Vet. Rec. 77, 498.Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. & Thompson, R. H. (1963). Br. vet. J. 119, 161.10.1016/S0007-1935(17)42452-3Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. & Thompson, R. H. (1964). J. comp. Path. 74, 542.10.1016/S0368-1742(64)80060-6Google Scholar
Todd, J. R. & Thompson, R. H. (1965). Br. vet. J. 121, 90.10.1016/S0007-1935(17)41355-8Google Scholar
Van Adrichem, P. W. M. (1965). Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 90, 1371.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. D., McCall, J. T., Bass, B. & Combs, G. E. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1153.10.2527/jas1960.1941153xGoogle Scholar