Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T09:58:41.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of experimental methods for determining the energy expenditure of man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

R. C. Garry
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, University of Glasgow
C. G. Douglas
Affiliation:
15 Marston Ferry Road, Oxford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1956

References

Atwater, W. O. & Benedict, F. G. (1905). Publ. Carneg. Instn no. 42.Google Scholar
Becker, G. & Hämäläinen, J. W. (1914). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 31, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, F. G. (1912). Deutsch. Arch. klin. Med. 107, 156.Google Scholar
Benzinger, T. H. & Kitzinger, C. (1949). Rev. sci. Instrum. 20, 849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capstick, J. W. (1921). J. agric. Sci. 11, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arsonval, A. (1886). J. Anat., Paris, 22, 113.Google Scholar
Daynes, H. A. (1920). Proc. roy. Soc. A, 97, 273.Google Scholar
Douglas, C. G. (1911). J. Physiol. 42, 17.Google Scholar
Durig, A., Kolmer, W., Rainer, R., Reichel, H. & Caspari, W. (1909). Denkschr. Ahad. Wiss. Wien, 86, 242.Google Scholar
Fleisch, A. (1954). Nouvelles Méthodes d'Étude des Échanges Guzeux et de la Fonction Pulmonaire. Bâle: Benno Schwabe & Co.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. C. (1949). Rev. sci. Instrum. 20, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafe, E. (1910). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 65, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanriot, & Richet, C. (1891). Ann. Chim. (Phys.) sér. 6, 22, 495.Google Scholar
Hill, A. V. & Hill, A. M. (1913). J. Physiol. 46, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hil1, A. V. & Hill, A. M. (1914). J. Physiol. 48, 13 P.Google Scholar
Hilchcock, F. A. & Stacy, R. W. (1948). Amer. J. Physiol. 155, 443.Google Scholar
Hoppe-Seyler, F. (1894). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 19, 574.Google Scholar
Jaquet, A. (1903). Verh. naturf. Ges. Basel, 15, 252.Google Scholar
Kofrányi, E. & Michaelis, H. P. (1940). Arbeitsphysiologie, 11, 148.Google Scholar
Krogh, A. (1906). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 18, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A. & Lindhard, J. (1920). Biochem. J. 14, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoisier, A. L. (17751985). (Euvres de Lavoisier. Vol. 2, Paris: Imprimerie Imperiale, 1865.Google Scholar
Lilly, J. C. (1946). Fed. Proc. 5, 64.Google Scholar
Magnus-Levy, A. (1894). Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol. 55, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, L., Wood, R. E. & Sturdivant, J. H. (1946). Science, 103, 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettenkofer, M. (1862). Ann. Chem. Pharm. Suppl. Bd. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Pettersson, O. & Sondén, K. (1895). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 6, 16.Google Scholar
Regnault, V. & Reiset, J. (1849). Ann. Chim. (Phys.), 26 (3), 299.Google Scholar
Rein, H. (1933). Arch. exper. Path. Pharmak. 171, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubner, M. (1894). Z. Biol. 30, 73.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (1859 a). Philos. Trans. 149, 681.Google Scholar
Smith, E. (1859 b). Philos. Trans. 149, 715.Google Scholar
Sondén, K. & Tigerstedt, R. (1895). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 6, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speck, C. (1892). Physiologie des meschlichen Athmens nach eigenen Untersuchungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tigerstedt, R. (1906). Skand. Arch. Physiol. 18, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissot, F. (1904). J. Physiol. Path. gén. 6, 688.Google Scholar
Voit, C. (1875). Z. Biol. 11, 532.Google Scholar
von der Heide, Klein, & Zuntz, N. (1913). Z. wiss. Landwirtschf. 4, 765.Google Scholar
Zuntz, N. Loewy, A., Müller, F. & Caspari, W. (1906). Höhenklima and Bergwanderungen. Berlin: Bong & Co.Google Scholar