Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:42:54.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of meat in the diets of Irish adults (18–90 years)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

C. Cocking
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
L. Kehoe
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
B.A. McNulty
Affiliation:
UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
A.P. Nugent
Affiliation:
UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, Republic of Ireland
J. Walton
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland Dept. Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Republic of Ireland
A. Flynn
Affiliation:
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Meat is a nutrient dense food eaten in a variety of different forms, often being the central food around which meals are based(Reference Bender1). The aim of this analysis was to estimate the intakes of meat and meat products and their contribution to nutrient intakes in Irish adults. Analyses were based on data from the National Adult Nutrition Survey (2008–2010) (www.iuna.net). A 4-day semi-weighed food diary was used to collect dietary intake data from a nationally representative sample of Irish adults aged 18–90 years (n = 1500). Nutrient intake data were analysed using WISP© v3·0 based on UK(2) and Irish(Reference Black, Ireland and Møller3) food composition tables. For the purpose of these analyses, red meat is defined as unprocessed beef, veal, lamb, pork and venison (including minced or frozen meat). Processed meat is defined as red meat that has been treated with preservatives, excluding salt, but including some cured meat products. Meat intakes from meat products and composite dishes were estimated following disaggregation of the non-meat components (e.g. potatoes, pasta, vegetables, sauces, oils, coatings). Nutrient intakes from meat products and composite dishes (as consumed) were estimated including the non-meat components. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS© v24.

* M: Men, W: Women

The proportions of adults consuming total meat, red meat, processed meat, and ‘poultry & game’ were 98, 82, 82, and 80%, respectively. Mean intakes of total meat were 163 g/d for men (red meat: 66 g/d, processed meat: 43 g/d, poultry & game: 54 g/d) and 101 g/d for women (red meat: 38 g/d, processed meat: 24 g/d, poultry & game: 39 g/d). Overall, meat and meat products contributed 17% of energy intake. Relative to their contribution to energy intake, meat and meat products contributed greater proportions of protein, mono-unsaturated fat, B vitamins, zinc and vitamin D (most age/sex groups), and similar proportions of iron. However, they also contributed greater proportions of fat (total and saturated) and sodium intakes. These findings show that while meat and meat products are a key contributor to intakes of important macro- and micro-nutrients in Irish adults, they also contribute high proportions of total fat, saturated fat and sodium.

The authors acknowledge the contribution of Meat Technology Ireland (MTI), a co-funded industry/Enterprise Ireland Technology Centre funded through the Technology Centre programme (TC 2016 002). The National Adult Nutrition Survey was funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food under the Food for Health Research Initiative (2007–2012).

References

1.Bender, A (1992) FAO Food Nutr Pap 53, 191.Google Scholar
2.Food Standards Agency (2002) McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: RSC.Google Scholar
3.Black, LJ, Ireland, J, Møller, A et al. (2011) J Food Compost Anal 24(7), 10171023.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*