Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-27T06:16:57.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calleva Atrebatum: An Interim Report on the Excavation of the Oppidum, 1980–86

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Michael Fulford
Michael Fulford*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Reading, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Excavation of the basilica of the Roman town of Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum) has produced evidence for two phases of pre-Roman occupation. The earlier, probably dating to the mid-first century BC, consisted of roundhouses and pits. Around 20 BC a rectilinear steet pattern, with building plots at right angles to the streets and rectangular buildings, was laid out; later a palisaded enclosure was built. Imports included amphorae and fine pottery; Central Gaulish wares suggest an early trade connection to the south. There is some evidence of disuse before the Roman streets were laid out on a different alignment in mid first century AD.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , 1987 , pp. 271 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Boon, G. C., 1969. ‘Belgic and Roman Silchester: the excavations of 1954–9 with an excursus on the early history of Calleva’, Archaeologia 102, 1–81.Google Scholar
Boon, G. C., 1974. Silchester: The Roman Town of Calleva. Newton Abbot.Google Scholar
Boon, G. C., 1985. ‘Ancient British and Gaulish coins from Silchester’, in Fulford, 1985b, 13–16.Google Scholar
Corney, M., 1983. ‘The Brooches’, in Fulford, 1985b, 18–11.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W. and Rowley, T., 1976. Oppida in Barbarian Europe. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Supp. Ser. 11.Google Scholar
Demoule, J. P. and Ilett, M., 1985. ‘First-millenium settlement and society in northern France: a case study from the Aisne Valley’, in Megaw, J. V. S. and Champion, T. C. (eds), Settlement and Society: aspects of West European Prehistory in the first millenium BC, 193–221. Leicester: University Press.Google Scholar
Frere, S. S., 1972. Verulamium Excavations I. Oxford: Soc. Ant. London Res. Rept 28.Google Scholar
Fulford, M. 1985a. ‘Excavations on the sites of the Amphitheatre and Forum-Basilica at Silchester, Hampshire: an interim report’, Antiquaries J. 65, 39–81.Google Scholar
Fulford, M., 1985 (b). Guide to the Silchester Excavations: the Forum Basilica 1982–84. University of Reading: Dept of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Fulford, M., forthcoming. ‘Silchester and the late Iron Age of Central Southern Britain’, in Mason, P. et al. (eds), Europe in the 1st Millenium BC: New Work. A collection of papers in honour of J. Alexander. Oxford: University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Grant, A., 1985. ‘The animal bones’, in Fulford, 1985b, 29–31.Google Scholar
Partridge, C., 1981. Skeleton Green. London: Society for Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Rigby, V., 1985. ‘The Gallo-Belgic wares — discussion and conclusions’, in Niblett, R., Sheepen: an early Roman industrial site at Camulodunum, London, 74–82. London: CBA Research Rpt 57.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M. and Rigby, V., 1986. Baldock: The Excavation a Roman and Pre-Roman Settlement, 1968–72. London: Society for Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Thompson, I., 1982. Grog-tempered ‘Belgic’ Pottery of South-eastern England. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports British Series 168.Google Scholar
Timby, J., 1985. ‘The pottery’, in Fulford, 1985b, 25–28.Google Scholar
Williams, D., 1981. ‘The Roman amphorae trade with late Iron Age Britain’, in Howard, H. and Morris, E. L. (eds), Production and Distribution: a ceramic viewpoint, 123–32. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Int. Ser. 120.Google Scholar