Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T00:32:45.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Ancient Channel between Caversham and Henley, Oxfordshire, and its contained Flint Implements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Extract

The wide depression which cuts across the loop of the Thames from Caversham to Henley and marks the course of a trench partly filled with gravel was constantly under observation by Mr Llewellyn Treacher for a number of years. Together with certain fragments of its possible continuation as far east as Winter Hill, north of Cookham Rise, it forms the subject of the present paper.

This ancient channel leaves the Thames Valley at Mapledurham, the middle of its path being marked by Chazey Wood, and passing eastwards between Binfield Heath and Peppard, joins the Thames again at Henley. The Geological Survey maps do not differentiate the deposits which fill it from the plateau gravel generally known as fluvioglacial gravel or Northern Drift. One object of this paper is to show that the channel is not filled with Northern Drift but with a gravel so different that it must have been laid down at a different time and under quite other conditions. A number of years ago Mr Osborne White recognized that an exposure near Blagrave Farm towards the western end of the channel was Thames gravel and in later years suggested that the deposits seen south-west of Henley were contemporaneous with the Silchester stage, that is the highest terrace of the Kennet, which he had so named in 1902 (White, 1895; 1902; 1908, p. 88).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blake, J. H. 1903. Geology of Reading, Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
Bury, H. 1913. Report of an Excursion to Farnham, Proc Geol. Assoc., XXIV, p. 202.Google Scholar
Hawkins, H. L. 1936. Report of Field Meeting in the Southern Chilterns, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XLVII, p. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monckton, H. W. 1893. On Boulders and Pebbles from the Glacial Drift, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., XLIX, p. 314.Google Scholar
Treacher, Ll. 1926. Excursion to Shiplake, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XXXVII, p. 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walder, P. S. 1940. An Unmapped Outlier of Reading Beds near Reading, Proc. Geol. Assoc., LI, p. 211.Google Scholar
Whitaker, W. 1889. Geology of London, Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
White, H. J. Osborne. 1895. On the Distribution and Relations of the Westleton and Glacial Gravels, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XIV, pp. 19 and 20.Google Scholar
White, H. J. Osborne. 1902. Proc. Geol. Assoc., XVII, p. 404.Google Scholar
White, H. J. Osborne. 1908. Geology of Henley, Mem. Geol. Survey.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. 1938. Glaciation of the London Basin and Evolution of Lower Thames Drainage System, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., XCIV, p. 634.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1945. ‘Palaeoliths from, the Wallingford fan-gravels’, Oxoniensia, VIII–IX, 1.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1946. ‘Three Oxfordshire palaeoliths’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. for 1945, 20.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1947. ‘The Geology of Oxford’. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1948. ‘A Palaeolith from the Hanborough terrace’, Oxoniensia, XI–XII, 1.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1939. ‘The Pleistocene succession in the Somme Valley’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., N.S., V, 33.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1939 and Koslowski, L. 19311932. ‘Éstudes de stratigraphie paléolithique dans le nord de la France la Belgique et l'Angleterre’, l'Anthropologie XLI, 449, XLII, 28, 291.Google Scholar
Hare, F. K., 1947. ‘The geomorphology of a part of the Middle Thames’, Proc. Geol. Assoc., LVIII, 294.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. and Oakley, K. P. 1938, in ‘Report on the Swanscombe Skull’, Journ. R. Anthrop. Inst., LXVIII, 30.Google Scholar
Hawkins, H. L. 1936. ‘Report of field meeting in the Southern Chilterns’, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XLVII, 32.Google Scholar
Lacaille, A. D. 1939. ‘The palaeolithic contents of the gravels at East Burnham, Bucks’, Antiq. Journ. XIX, 166.Google Scholar
Lacaille, A. D. 1940. ‘The palaeoliths from the gravels of the Lower Boyn Hill terrace around Maidenhead’, Antiq. Journ., XX, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacaille, A. D. and Oakley, K. P. 1936. ‘The palaeolithic sequence at Iver, Bucks.’, Antiq. Journ., XVI, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, J. Reid. 1929. ‘Palaeolithic implements from the Cannonshot gravel of Norfolk’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. E. Anglia, VI, 1.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1939. ‘A Survey of the Prehistory of the Farnham district’, Surrey Arch. Collections.Google Scholar
Sandford, K. S. 1924. ‘The river-gravels of the Oxford district’, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., LXXX, 113.Google Scholar
Shrubsole, O. A. 1890. ‘On the Valley-gravels about Reading, with especial reference to the Palaeolithic implements found in them’, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., XLVI, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. A. 1933. ‘Implements from high-level gravel near Canterbury’. Proc Prehist. Soc E. Anglia, VII, 165.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1924. ‘Ancient Hunters’. (London).Google Scholar
Treacher, Ll., 1896. ‘Palaeolithic Man in East Berks.’, Berks., Bucks, and Oxon. Arch. Journ. NS., 11, 16–18, 3943.Google Scholar
Treacher, Ll. 1904. ‘On the occurrence of stone implements in the Thames valley between Reading and Maidenhead’, Man, no. 10, p. 17 and plate B.Google Scholar
Treacher, Ll. 1909. ‘Excursion to Maidenhead’, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XXI, 198.Google Scholar
Treacher, Ll. 1926. ‘Excursion to Shiplake’. Proc. Geol. Assoc., XXXVII, 440.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, M. E. 1941. ‘Pleistocene gravels of the Cotswold subedge plain from Mickleton to the Frome valley’, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., XCVI, 385.Google Scholar
White, H. J. O. 1895. ‘On the distribution and relations of the Westleton and Glacial gravels in parts of Oxfordshire and Berkshire’, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XIV, 11.Google Scholar
White, H. J. O. 1904. ‘Excursion to Henley-on-Thames’, Proc. Geol. Assoc., XVIII, 414.Google Scholar
Willis, G. W. 1947. ‘Hampshire Palaeoliths and the Clay-with-Flints’, Proc. Hants. Field Club and Arch. Soc., XVI, 253.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, S. W. 1938. ‘The glaciation of the London basin and the evolution of the Lower Thames drainage system’, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., XCIV, 161.Google Scholar