Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:25:07.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative and absolute dating of four late Neolithic enclosures: an exercise in the interpretation of radiocarbon determinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

R. Burleigh ,
I. H. Longworth  and
G. J. Wainwright
R. Burleigh
Affiliation:
British Museum
I. H. Longworth
Affiliation:
British Museum
G. J. Wainwright
Affiliation:
Department of the Environment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

If the fine structure of the carbon-14 deviation curve published by Professor H. E. Suess (in Proceedings of the 12th Nobel Symposium, I. U. Olsson (ed.), 1970) is correct, then the period from c. 2200 bc to c. 1700 bc in radiocarbon years falls within one of the insensitive regions in which carbon-14 determinations could have a number of alternative chronological values and hence could not be used to order archaeological evidence. Without disputing the now well established general trend of radiocarbon variation, it is the purpose of this paper to suggest, from recurrent evidence drawn from four recently studied Late Neolithic enclosures, that the detailed structure of Suess' curve is not necessarily valid. Uncalibrated radiocarbon dates based on the conventional 5570 year half-life of carbon-14 are used throughout this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 38 , December 1972 , pp. 389 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, H., 1967. ‘Radiocarbon dating of bone’, Nature, 213, 415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, H., Burleigh, R. and Meeks, N., 1969. ‘British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements VI’, Radiocarbon, 11, 278–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, H., Burleigh, R. and Meeks, N., 1971. ‘British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements VII’, Radiocarbon, 13, 157–88.Google Scholar
Berger, R., 1970. ‘Ancient Egyptian radiocarbon chronology’, in The Impact of the Natural Sciences on Archaeology, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond. A. 269, 23–36.Google Scholar
Bucha, V., 1969. ‘Changes of the earth's magnetic moment and radiocarbon dating’, Nature, 224, 681–2.Google Scholar
Bucha, V. and Neustupny, E., 1967. ‘Changes of the earth's magnetic field and radiocarbon dating’, Nature, 215, 261–3.Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., 1971a. ‘Radiocarbon dates for Marden’, in Wainwright, G. J., ‘The excavation of a late neolithic enclosure at Marden, Wiltshire’, Ant J., 51 (in the press).Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., 1971b. ‘Radiocarbon dates for the enclosure ditch and phase 2 of the southern circle’, in Wainwright, G. J. and Longworth, I. H., 1971, Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968, Rep. Res. Comm. Soc. Ant. London, 29, 411.Google Scholar
Burleigh, R., 1972. ‘Liquid scintillation counting of low levels of carbon-14 for radiocarbon dating’, in Liquid Scintillation Counting, 2, Heyden and Sons, London (in the press).Google Scholar
Callow, W. J., Baker, M. J. and Pritchard, D. H., 1963. ‘National Physical Laboratory radiocarbon measurements I’, Radiocarbon, 5, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, W. J. and Hassall, G. I., 1970. ‘National Physical Laboratory radiocarbon measurements VII’, Radiocarbon, 12, 181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. L., 1970. Beaker Pottery of Great Britain and Ireland, v. 1, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cunnington, M. E., 1929. Woodhenge, Devizes, George Simpson and Co.Google Scholar
Damon, P. E., Long, A. and Grey, D. C., 1966. ‘Fluctuations of atmospheric C-14 during the last six millennia’, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1055–63.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E. S., 1970. ‘Absolute dating from Egyptian records and comparison with carbon-14 dating’, in The Impact of the Natural Sciences on Archaeology, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond. A. 269, 11–18.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. and Burleigh, R., 1969. ‘Radiocarbon dates for the South Street long barrow, Wiltshire’, Antiquity, 43, 144–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. W., 1968. ‘Bristlecone pine: science and esthetics’, Science, 159, 839–846.Google Scholar
Grey, D. C., 1969. ‘Geophysical mechanisms for C-14 variations’, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 6333–9.Google Scholar
Krueger, H. W., 1965. ‘The preservation and dating of collagen in ancient bones’, in Proc. 6th Internatl. Conf. Radiocarbon and Tritium Dating, Washington, June 7–11, 1965, 332–7. USAEC (CONF-650652).Google Scholar
Lamb, H. H., 1966. The Changing Climate, London, Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Lerman, J. C., Mook, W. G., Vogel, J. C. and de Waard, H., 1969. ‘Carbon-14 in Patagonian tree rings’, Science, 165, 1123–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libby, W. F., 1955. Radiocarbon Dating, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neustupny, E., 1970. ‘A new epoch in radiocarbon dating’, Antiquity, 44, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, I. U. (ed.), 1970. Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology, Proc. 12th Nobel Symposium, Uppsala, Aug. 11–15, 1969, New York, John Wiley, and Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1959, ‘The radiocarbon dates from Durrington Walls’, Antiquity, 33, 289–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, E. K. and Michael, H. N., 1967, ‘Problems of the radiocarbon calendar’, Archaeometry, 10, 3–11.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1968. ‘Wessex without Mycenae’, Annual of the British School of Archaeology at Athens, 63, 277–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1970a. ‘New configurations in Old World archaeology’, World Archaeology, 2, 199–211.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1970b. ‘The tree-ring calibration of radiocarbon: an archaeological evaluation’, PPS, 36, 280–311.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Suess, H. E., 1966. ‘On the relationship between radiocarbon dates and true sample ages’, Radiocarbon, 8, 534–40.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1965. ‘Secular variations of the cosmic ray-produced carbon-14 in the atmosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 70, 5937–52.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E., 1967. ‘Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 4100 B.C. to 1500 B.C.’, in Radioactive Dating and Methods of Low Level Counting, Proc. Monaco Symposium, Mar. 2–10, 1967, Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Vries, H. de, 1958. ‘Variations in concentration of radiocarbon with time and location on earth’, Konihkl. Nederlandse Akad. Wetensch. Proc. B, 61, 1–9.Google Scholar
Vries, H. de, Barendsen, G. W., and Waterbolk, H. T., 1958. ‘Groningen radiocarbon dates II’, Science, 127, 129–37.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1967. ‘The excavation of the henge monument at Durrington Walls, Wiltshire, 1966’, Ant. J., 47, 166–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1970. ‘Mount Pleasant’, Current Archaeology, 2, no. 12, 320–4.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G. J., 1971. ‘The excavation of a late neolithic enclosure at Marden, Wiltshire’, Ant. J., 51 (in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G. J. and Longworth, I. H., 1971. Durrington Walls: Excavations 1966–1968, Rep. Res. Comm. Soc. Ant. London, 29.Google Scholar
Wendland, W. M. and Donley, D. L., 1971. ‘Radiocarbon-calendar age relationship’, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 11, 135–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, E. H., Tauber, H., and Munnich, K. O., 1960. ‘Variations in the atmospheric radiocarbon concentration over the past 1300 years’, Am. J. Sci. Radiocarbon Suppl., 2, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar