Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T17:27:57.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stone Axes as a Guide to Neolithic Communications and Boundaries in England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

W. A. Cummins
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Nottingham

Extract

Six of the twenty-five British implement petrology groups (Clough and Cummins 1979, 127)—Group I (Penzance, Cornwall), Group IV (Callington, Cornwall), Group VI (Langdale, Lake District), Group VII (Penmaenmawr, North Wales), Group VIII (South-west Wales), and Group XVI (Camborne, Cornwall)—account for almost half of all the stone axes so far examined from England and Wales. In every part for the country, one or other of these six is the most abundant individual group. On the basis of stone axe distribution studies (Cummins 1979), the country seems to fall naturally into three major provinces (fig. 1), which might possibly be interpreted as Neolithic tribal territories. Northern and Central England, the largest of these provinces, is dominated by Group VI axes which, though originating in the Lake District, seem to have been distributed from a secondary centre in Humberside. Wales, including Herefordshire and part of Shropshire, forms another province and is dominated by Welsh axes, Group VII in the north, and Group VIII in the south. Southern England, the third province, is dominated by Cornish ‘greenstone’ axes, mainly Group I but locally, in the south-west, Groups IV and XVI.

Cumulative percentages of all axes belonging to each group plotted against distance from its distribution centre (Cummins 1979, figs. 4–9) give an indication of absolute frequency variation in relation to that centre. The shape of the plots is controlled by two variables, (i) the cumulative increase of area with distance from the centre, and (ii) the variation in average frequency of the grouped axes (per unit area) with distance from the centre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, C. J. 1952. ‘Die nordschwedischen Flintdepots. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des neolithischen Fernhandels in Skandinavien’, Acta Arch. 23, 3179.Google Scholar
Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (Eds.) 1979. Stone axe studies C.B.A. Research Report 23.Google Scholar
Clough, T. H. McK. and Green, B. 1972. ‘The petrological identification of stone implements from East Anglia’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 38, 108155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1974. ‘The Neolithic stone axe trade in Britain’, Antiquity 68, 201205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1978a. ‘Stone axe trade or glacial erratics?’, Current Archaeology 6, 4243.Google Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1978b. ‘A Graig Lwyd stone axe rough-out from Holme Pierrepont, Nottinghamshire’, Trans. Thoroton Soc. Notts. 82, 6668.Google Scholar
Cummins, W. A. 1979. ‘Neolithic stone axes: distribution and trade in England and Wales; in Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (Eds.), Stone axe studies C.B.A. Research Report 23, 512.Google Scholar
Fox, C. 1932. The personality of Britain National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Roe, F. E. S. 1979. ‘Typology of stone implements with shaftholes’, in Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (Eds.) Stone axe studies C.B.A. Research Report 23, 2348.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1974. ‘The Neolithic’, in Renfrew, C. (Ed.), British Prehistory 100136.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1979. ‘The chronology of British stone implements’, in Clough, T. H. McK. and Cummins, W. A. (Eds.), Stone axe Studies C.B.A. Research Report 23, 1322.Google Scholar