Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T16:47:35.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frescobaldi's Early Inganni and Their Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1978

Get access

Extract

It is forty years since Willi Apel published his important article which linked Frescobaldi's keyboard music with that of the contemporary Neapolitan composers, Mayone and Trabaci. By drawing attention to generic, formal and stylistic features common to the music of Frescobaldi and the Neapolitans he established a more balanced outlook on Italian keyboard music of the seventeenth century, and also pointed to Cabezon as an influence on Mayone and Trabaci. There is, however, a case for reconsidering this current view in the light of the artistic contacts between Naples and Ferrara in the last decade of the sixteenth century, and for examining the possible origins of some of the compositional processes that have appeared to link Frescobaldi to his southern counterparts. Professor Apel singled out features common to Frescobaldi, Mayone and Trabaci; and more recent work by Roland Jackson has established further musical evidence to support the specific influence of Trabaci on Frescobaldi's chromatic compositions and toccatas, and to suggest a more general pattern of musical practice in Naples, exemplified in the chromatic and other compositional procedures found both in Trabaci's music and in the works – vocal as well as instrumental – of Gesualdo and de Macque. Amongst these procedures is the device of inganno which Jackson has identified in some of Frescobaldi's mature chromatic music.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 The Royal Musical Association and the Authors

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Willi Apel, ‘Neapolitan Links between Cabezon and Frescobaldi’, Musical Quarterly, xxiv (1938), 419–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Roland Jackson, ‘On Frescobaldi's Chromaticism and its Background’, Musical Quarterly, lvii (1971), 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Roland Jackson, ‘The Inganni and the Keyboard Music of Trabaci’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, xxi (1968), 204–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Anthony Newcomb, ‘Carlo Gesualdo and a Musical Correspondence of 1594’, Musical Quarterly, liv (1968), 409–36; Anthony Newcomb, ‘Alfonso Fontanelli and the seconda pratica in Ferrara: some newly uncovered music and letters’, IMS Report 1972 (Copenhagen, 1974), 576–80.Google Scholar

5 Relevant passages of the letters are quoted in Anthony Newcomb, ‘Carlo Gesualdo and a Musical Correspondence’.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., 417.Google Scholar

7 Giovanni Maria Trabaci, Ricercate, canzone franzese … (Naples, 1603); Il secando libro de ricercate … (Naples, 1615).Google Scholar

8 Willi Apel, The History of Keyboard Music to 1700, tr. and rev. Hans Tischler (Bloomington/London, 1972), 453.Google Scholar

9 Girolamo Frescobaldi, Il primo libro delle fantasie (Milan, 1608).Google Scholar

10 Conzomi per sonare … da diversi eccellentissimi musici, pub. Alessandro Raverii (Venice, 1608).Google Scholar

11 Giovanni Maria Artusi, L'Artusi overo delle imperfettioni della musica moderna (Venice, i, 1600; ii, 1603; reprinted 1968).Google Scholar

12 Ibid., ii, 45f.Google Scholar

13 E.g. ‘Recercar Cromaticho post il Credo’, Messa degli Apostoli, Fiori musicali (Venice, 1635); discussed in Roland Jackson, ‘On Frescobaldi's Chromaticism’.Google Scholar

14 This complex field of musical theory and practice is exposed in Gaston Allaire, The Theory of Hexachords, Solmization and the Modal System, Musicological Studies and Documents, xxiv (Rome, 1972).Google Scholar

15 Andreas Ornithoparchus, Musice Active Micrologus (2nd edn., Leipzig, 1517), reproduced in A Compendium of Musical Practice (New York, 1973).Google Scholar

16 Viginti missarum, secundus liber, pub. Pierre Attaingnant (Paris, 1532).Google Scholar

17 Op. cit., 123–45.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., 145–51.Google Scholar

19 Le dotte et eccellente compositioni de i madrigali a cinque voci, pub. Girolamo Scotto (Venice, 1540).Google Scholar

20 Girolamo Frescobaldi, op. cit.; modern edition, Orgel- und Klavierwerke, ed. Pierre Pidoux (Kassel, 1949–54), i, 346.Google Scholar

21 Willi Apel, The History of Keyboard Music to 1700, 450.Google Scholar

22 Antologia di musica antica e moderna per pianoforte, ed. Gino Tagliapietra (Milan, 1931–3), iv, 1.Google Scholar

23 E.g., bars 7092.Google Scholar

24 Robert Donington, The Interpretation of Early Music (rev. London, 1974), 618f.Google Scholar

25 Op. cit.Google Scholar

26 Girolamo Diruta, Il transilvano (Venice, 1593; reprinted 1969), f. 24f.; Seconda parte del transilvano (Venice, 1610; 2nd edn. 1622, reprinted 1969), ii, 24f.Google Scholar

27 Florentio Maschera, Libro primo canzoni da sonare a quattro voci (Brescia, 1584).Google Scholar

28 Canzon di diversi per sonar con ogni sorte di stromenti, pub. Giacomo Vincenzi (Venice, 1588).Google Scholar

29 Adriano Willaert, et al., Fantasie recercari contrapunti a tre voci (Venice, 1551).Google Scholar

30 Op. cit., 441.Google Scholar

31 Vincenzo Pellegrini, Canzoni de intavolatura d'organo (Venice, 1599).Google Scholar

32 Claudio Merulo, Canzoni d'intavolature d'organo (Venice, 1592).Google Scholar

33 Andrea Gabrieli, Il terzo libro de ricercari (Venice, 1596).Google Scholar

34 Girolamo Cavazzoni, Intabolatura d'organo (Venice, [?1543]).Google Scholar

35 Claude Palisca, The Artusi-Monteverdi Controversy', The Monteverdi Companion, eds., Denis Arnold and Nigel Fortune (London, 1968), 133–66.Google Scholar

36 Op. cit., ii, 45.Google Scholar