Last updated 27/06/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Many of the pieces in Matthew Locke's seven sets of consort music, whose principal source is the great score-book in the British Museum, Add. MS 17801, were subjected to a process of careful and repeated revision. The changes Locke made were sometimes extensive, involving the restructuring of an entire movement, the introduction of new material, or the substantial modification of that existing already. The editor of such works must decide whether he is going to present a single version—in this case presumably the composer's final revision—or to embody the variant readings in a textual commentary, or to print such readings in their entirety as parallel texts. The usefulness of a textual commentary tends to be in inverse proportion to its length: the more variants there are to be listed the less easy it becomes to perceive the overall shape of that version of the text embodying them. In the case of Locke's music ‘For Several Friends’ and the movements of the Flat Consort which were subjected to much change the ideal solution is obviously to print both first and last versions in full. But Locke is after all not Beethoven, and in the recent Musica Britannica edition only the composer's final versions have been presented, with a few examples of movements from the early version of the Flat Consort to illustrate the extent and nature of the modifications. Nevertheless, Locke's revisions are worth considering in some detail, for they reveal a composer with a mind both restless and fastidious. The best point of departure is the autograph score-book itself which Locke entitled ‘Compositions for Broken, and whole Consorts, of two, three, Fower, Five, and Six Parts, made by Matthew Locke, Composer in Ordinary to his Majestye’.
1 Matthew Locke: Chamber Music, ed. Michael Tilmouth (Musica Britannica, xxxi-xxxii), London, 1971–2.Google Scholar
2 Add. 17801, ff. 1, 2v. Further details concerning this and other sources will be found in the textual commentary to the Musica Britannica edition. I am grateful to Miss Pamela Willetts of the British Museum for her assistance in examining the score-book, and to Mr. Howard Nixon for many observations on the binding.Google Scholar
3 Mason, E., Vindiciae Ecclesiae Anglicanae, London, 1625; H. Hugo, De militia equestri antiqua et nova, Antwerp, 1630; and J. Stow, Annales, London, 1631 (British Museum shelf-marks c.18.b.15, c.46.k.2 and c.21.e.11).Google Scholar
4 Briggs, H., Arithmetica logarithmica, London, 1624 (British Museum c.82.f.8).Google Scholar
5 Heawood, E., Watermarks (Monumenta Chartae Papyraceae, i), Hilversum, 1950.Google Scholar
6 A Thematic Catalogue of the Works of Matthew Locke, Oxford, 1971, notes to Table I.Google Scholar
7 Op. cit., p. 166.Google Scholar
8 Musica Britannica, xxxi. 41.Google Scholar
9 Ibid., xxxi. 43.Google Scholar
10 ‘Matthew Locke and the Consort Suite’, Music & Letters, li (1970), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Musica Britannica, xxxi. 99, bars 31–34.Google Scholar
12 Ibid., xxxi. 119ff. and 138ff.; 126ff. and 139ff.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., xxxii. 59, bars 65–73 (originally four bars shorter and settling quickly into a diatonic A minor).Google Scholar
14 Foundations of English Opera, Cambridge, 1928, p. 120.Google Scholar
15 John Wilson, Roger North on Music, London, 1959, p. 301.Google Scholar
16 Henry Purcell 1659–1695, London, 1967, p. 47.Google Scholar
17 Observations upon a Late Book …, London, 1672, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
18 Musica Britannica, xxxii. 84, bars 52–67.Google Scholar
19 Ernest Walker, A History of Music in England, 3rd edn., rev. J. A. Westrup, Oxford, 1952, p. 169.Google Scholar
20 ‘Purcell's Art of Fantasia’, Music & Letters, xxxiii (1952), 341–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 ‘Purcell's Chamber Music’, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association, lxxxv (1958/59), 93.Google Scholar
22 Michael Tilmouth, ‘The Technique and Forms of Purcell's Sonatas’, Music & Letters, xl (1959), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
