Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T13:23:05.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—Spontaneous Fission Rates and the Role of the “Excess” Neutrons in Heavy Nuclei*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

N. Feather
N. Feather
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Philosophy, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Empirical regularities are sought amongst the experimental data relative to the spontaneous fission rates and the nucleon-pair binding energies of the heavy even-even nuclei. Certain regularities are found which have not hitherto been noted; in particular it appears that the isotopic number D is a significant parameter in relation to these various quantities. The speculation is made that possibly the saddle-point deformation of the protons in the nucleus is greater than that of the neutrons. Predictions are made concerning the spontaneous fission rates of the even-even isotopes of thorium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , 1962 , pp. 20 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Bodmer, A. R., 1960. Nuclear Phys., 17, 388–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, D. W., 1961. Phys. Rev., 121, 1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flerov, G. N., Klochkov, D. S., Skobkin, V. S., and Terent'ev, V. V., 1958. Soviet. Phys (Doklady), 3, 79–80.Google Scholar
Ghiorso, A., Thompson, S. G., Higgins, G. H., Harvey, B. G., and Seaborg, G. T., 1954. Phys. Rev., 95, 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. A. E., 1959. Nuclear Phys., 12, 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. A. E., 1961. Nuclear Phys., 22,529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolesnikov, N. N., and Larin, S. I., 1955. J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 28, 244–245.Google Scholar
Seeger, P. A., 1961. Nuclear Phys., 25, 1–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studier, M. H., and Huizenga, J. R., 1954. Phys. Rev., 96, 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiatecki, W. J., 1955. Phys. Rev., 110, 937–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbosch, R., and Seaborg, G. T., 1958. Phys. Rev., 110, 507–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildermuth, K., and Kanellopoulos, T., 1958. Nuclear Phys., 7, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar