Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T22:43:03.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The asymptotic form of the spectral functions associated with a class of Sturm–Liouville equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

B. J. Harris
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb. Illinois 60115-2888, U.S.A.

Synopsis

We use a modified form of the Stieltjes inversion formula due to Atkinson together with some recent results on the asymptotic form of Titchmarch–Weyl m-functions to obtain an asymptotic expression for the spectral functions τ(t) associated with the differential equation

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Atkinson, F. V.. On the location of the Weyl circles. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect.A 88 (1981), 345356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Atkinson, F. V.. On the asymptotic behavior of the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-coefficient and the spectral function for scalar second order differential expressions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 949 (Berlin: Springer, 1982).Google Scholar
3Bennewitz, C. and Everitt, W. N.. Some remarks on the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-coefficient. In Tribute to Ake Pleijel (Department of Mathematics, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, 1980).Google Scholar
4Evans, W. D. and Everitt, W. N.. A return to the Hardy-Littlewood inequality Proc. Roy. Soc. London A380, (1982), 447486.Google Scholar
5Everitt, W. N.. On a property of the m-coefficient of a second order linear differential equation. J. London Math. Soc. 4 (1972), 443457.Google Scholar
6Everitt, W. N. and Halvorsen, S. G.. On the asymptotic form of the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-coefficient. Applicable Anal. 8 (1978), 153169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Everitt, W. N., Hinton, D. B. and Shaw, J. K.. The asymptotic form of the Titchmarsh-Weyl coefficient for systems. J. London Math. Soc. 27 (1983), 465476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Everitt, W. N. and Zettl, A.. On a class of integral inequalities. J. London Math. Soc. 17 (1978), 291303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Harris, B. J.. Bounds for the point spectra of Sturm–Liouville equation. J. London Math. Soc. 25 (1982), 145161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Harris, B. J.. Criteria for Sturm–Liouville equations to have continuous spectra. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 93 (1983), 235249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Harris, B. J.. On the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-function. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 95 (1983), 223237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Harris, B. J.. The asymptotic form of the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-function. To appear in J. London Math. Soc.Google Scholar
13Harris, B. J.. The asymptotic form of the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-function associated with a Dirac system. To appear in J. London Math. Soc.Google Scholar
14Harris, B. J.. The asymptotic form of the Titchmarsh–Weyl m-function for a second order linear differential equation with analytic coefficient. Preprint Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
15Hinton, D. B. and Shaw, J. K.. On Titchmarsh–Weyl M(λ) functions for linear Hamiltonian systems. J. Differential Equations 40 (1981), 316342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Levitan, B. M. and Sargsyan, I. S.. Introduction to spectral theory for self-adjoint ordinary differential equations. Moscow: Nauka, 1970 (Also Translation of Mathematical Monographs Vol. 39, A.M.S. Providence, Rhode Island, 1975).Google Scholar
17MarČenko, V. A.. Some questions in the theory of one dimensional second order linear differential operations. Trudy Moscow. Mat. Obsc 1 (1952), 327340 (Also A.M.S. Translation (2) 101 (1975), 1–104.)Google Scholar
18Marčenko, V. A.. Sturm–Liouville operators and their applications (Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1977).Google Scholar
19Titchmarsh, E. C.. Eigenfunction Expansions, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar