Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:21:57.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV. A Modified Hilbert Transform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

D. S. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee

Summary

The solution of certain integral equations, which are related to the Hilbert transform, is discussed from the viewpoint of generalized functions. The behaviour of the corresponding transforms in the complex plane is examined for generalized functions which effectively vanish at infinity. A space of generalized functions which need not be small at infinity is introduced and the integral equations solved in this space. Various possible extensions of the theory are also mentioned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Heywood, P., 1967. J. Lond. Math. Soc., 42, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. S., 1965. J. Inst. Math. Applic., 1, 226.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S., 1965. J. Inst. Math. Applic., 1, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. S. 1966a. Inst. Math. Applic., 2, 197.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S. 1966b. “Generalised Functions”. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kober, H., 1967. J. Lond. Math. Soc., 42, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J., 1958. “Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions”. C.U.P.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T, and Chiang, W., 1967. Q. Appl. Math., 24, 303.Google Scholar
Okikiolu, G. O., 1965a. Lond. Math. Soc., 40, 27.Google Scholar
Okikiolu, G. O. 1965b. Proc. Catnb. Phil. Soc., 62, 73.Google Scholar
Peters, A. S., 1968. N. Y. Univ. Res. Rep, IMM 373.Google Scholar
Sakalyuk, K. W., 1965. Kisinev Gos. Univ. Uchen. Zap., 82, 60.Google Scholar
Stein, E. M. and Zygmund, A., 1965. Proc Lond. Math. Soc., 14, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar