Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T20:41:12.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Second-kind symmetric periodic orbits for planar perturbed Kepler problems and applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2023

Angelo Alberti
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Cidade Universitária Prof. José Aloísio de Campos, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristovão-SE, Brasil (angelo@mat.ufs.br)
Claudio Vidal
Affiliation:
Departamento de Matemática, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Concepción, VIII Región, Chile (clvidal@ubiobio.cl)

Abstract

We investigate the existence of families of symmetric periodic solutions of second kind as continuation of the elliptical orbits of the two-dimensional Kepler problem for certain symmetric differentiable perturbations using Delaunay coordinates. More precisely, we characterize the sufficient conditions for its existence and its type of stability is studied. The estimate on the characteristic multipliers of the symmetric periodic solutions is the new contribution to the field of symmetric periodic solutions. In addition, we present some results about the relationship between our symmetric periodic solutions and those obtained by the averaging method for Hamiltonian systems. As applications of our main results, we get new families of periodic solutions for: the perturbed hydrogen atom with stark and quadratic Zeeman effect, for the anisotropic Seeligers two-body problem and to the planar generalized Størmer problem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Society of Edinburgh

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abouelmagd, E. I., Alhowaity, S., Diab, Z., Guirao, J. L. G. and Shehata, M. H.. On the periodic solutions for the perturbed spatial quantized Hill problem. Mathematics 10 (2022), 614, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abouelmagd, E. I., Guirao, J. L. G. and Llibre, J.. Periodic orbits for the perturbed planar circular restricted $3$-body problem. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 24 (2019), 10071020.Google Scholar
Abouelmagd, E. I., Llibre, J. and Guirao, J. L. G.. Periodic orbits of the planar anisotropic Kepler problem. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 27 (2017), 1750039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abouelmagd, E. I., Llibre, J. and Guirao, J. L. G.. The dynamics of the relativistic Kepler problem. Res. Phys. 19 (2020), 103406.Google Scholar
Alberti, A. and Vidal, C.. Periodic solutions of symmetric Kepler perturbations and applications. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 23 (2016), 439465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alghamdi, M. H. and Alshaery, A. A.. Mathematical algorithm for solving two-body problem. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 5 (2020), 217228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alhowaity, S., Abouelmagd, E. I., Diab, Z. and Guirao, J. L. G.. Calculating periodic orbits of the Hénon-Heiles system. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 9 (2023), 945236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccaletti, D. and Pucacco, G.. Theory of orbits. Vol. 1 (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar
Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M.. Methods of celestial mechanics (New York: Academic Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Cabral, H. and Vidal, C.. Periodic solutions of symmetric perturbations of the Kepler problem. J. Differ. Equ. 163 (2000), 7688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bustos, M. T., Guirao, J. L. G., Vera, J. A. and Vigo-Aguilar, J.. Periodic orbits and $\mathcal {C}^1$-integrability in the planar Stark-Zeeman problem. J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), 082701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganesan, K. and Gȩbarowski, R.. Chaos in the hydrogen atom interacting with external fields. Pramana 48 (1997), 379410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirao, J. L. G., Llibre, J. and Vera, J. A.. Periodic orbits of Hamiltonian systems: applications to perturbed Kepler problems. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 57 (2013), 105111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirao, J. L. G, Roca, J. L. and López, J. A. V.. On the periodic structure of the anisotropic Manev problem. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 18 (2019), 987999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusev, A. A., Samoilov, V. N., Rostovtsev, V. A. and Vinitsky, S. I.. Algebraic perturbation theory for a hydrogen atom in weak electric fields. Prog. Comput. Software 27 (2001), 1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hénon, M.. Generating families in the restricted three-body problem. Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs, vol. 52 (Berlin: Springer, 1997).Google Scholar
Iñarrea, M., Lanchares, V., Palacián, J. F., Pascual, A. I., Salas, J. P. and Yanguas, P.. The Keplerian regime of charged particle in planetary magnetospheres. Physica D 197 (2004), 242268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iñarrea, M., Lanchares, V., Palacián, J. F., Pascual, A. I., Salas, J. P. and Yanguas, P.. Global dynamics of dust grains in magnetic planets. Phys. Lett. A 338 (2005), 247252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iñarrea, M., Lanchares, V., Palacián, J. F., Pascual, A. I., Salas, J. P. and Yanguas, P.. Symplectic coordinates on $S^2 \times S^2$ for perturbed Keplerian problems: application to the dynamics of a generalised Stormer problem. J. Differ. Equ. 250 (2011), 13861407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, M. A., Martínez, R. and Vera, J. A.. Periodic orbits of the anisotropic Kepler problem with quasihomogeneous potentials. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 25 (2015), 1540025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. R., Hall, G. R. and Offin, D.. Introduction to Hamiltonian dynamical system and the $N$-body problem, 3rd edn. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 90 (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2017).Google Scholar
Meyer, K. R., Palacián, J. F. and Yanguas, P.. Geometric averaging of Hamiltonian systems: periodic solutions, stability, and KAM tori. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 10 (2011), 817856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mioc, D. and Rusu, M.. Seeliger's two-body problem: collision, escape, symmetries. Rom. Astron. J. 16 (2006), 177191.Google Scholar
Palacián, J. F.. Normal forms for perturbed Keplerian systems. J. Differ. Equ. 180 (2002), 471519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacián, J. F., Vidal, C., Vidarte, J. and Yanguas, P.. Dynamics in the charged restricted circular three-body problem. J. Differ. Equ. 30 (2018), 17571774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paşca, E. and Valls, C.. Qualitative analysis of the anisotropic two-body problem under Seeliger's potential. Bull. Sci. Math. 138 (2014), 742755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poddar, A. K. and Sharma, D.. Periodic orbits in the restricted problem of three bodies in a three-dimensional coordinate system when the smaller primary is a triaxial rigid body. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 6 (2021), 429438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H.. Les méthodes nouvelles de la mecánique céleste (Paris: Dover Publ., 1987).Google Scholar
Popescu, E., Paşca, D., Mioc, V. and Popescu, N. A.. Seeliger's two-body problem (II): equilibria. Rom. Astron. J. 19 (2009), 141151.Google Scholar
Reeb, R.. Sur certaines propriétés topologiques des trajectoires des systèmes dynamiques. Acad. R. Sci. Lett. et Beaux-Arts de Belgique. Cl. des Sci. Mém. in 8° Ser. 2 27 (1952), 149.Google Scholar
Santoprete, M.. Symmetric periodic solutions of the anisotropic Manev problem. J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002), 3207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, C. and Moser, J.. Lectures on celestial mechanics (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szebehely, V.. Theory of orbits (New York: Academic Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Vidal, C.. Periodic solutions for any planar symmetric perturbation of the Kepler problem. Celestial Mech. Dyn. Astron. 80 (2001), 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, C.. Periodic solutions of symmetric perturbations of gravitational problems. J. Differ. Equ. 17 (2005), 85114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanguas, P., Palacián, J. F., Meyer, K. R. and Dumas, H. S.. Periodic solutions in Hamiltonian systems, averaging, and the Lunar problem. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 7 (2008), 311340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar