Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T08:26:37.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat selection and impact of red (Cervus elaphus L.) and roe (Capreolus capreolus L.) deer in a Sitka spruce plantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Brian W. Staines  and
David Welch
Brian W. Staines
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Banchory Research Station, Hill of Brathens, Glassel, Banchory AB3 4BY, Scotland
David Welch
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Banchory Research Station, Hill of Brathens, Glassel, Banchory AB3 4BY, Scotland
Get access

Synopsis

The study began in 1978 at Glenbranter Forest, Argyll. Use of habitat by red and roe deer was measured from the accumulation of pellet groups and from observations. Approximately 2000 trees less than 9 years old and 6000 older ones were monitored for damage and response.

Habitats in areas dominated by heather in or close to the forest were the most occupied by both species and pole-stage crops the least. However, most dung was found on the extensive areas of recently planted ground. Roe deer were relatively more abundant than red deer in stands of 9 to 15 year-old trees.

In summer, red deer ate mainly grasses and roe mainly forbs. In winter, these preferences remained, but Calluna became more important to both.

Browsing on leaders was heaviest in winter and May–June. Approximately 50% of leaders on trees less than 6 years old were browsed annually. Most trees regained leaders within 12 months, many becoming multi-stemmed. Of the trees. 1% were bark-stripped per annum. In older stands the smaller trees were most damaged, in younger stands the larger trees.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 82 , Issue 4: Deer, their biology, behaviour and impact , 1984 , pp. 303 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holmes, G. D. 1979. An introduction to forestry in upland Britain. In The Ecology of Even-aged Plantations, ed. Ford, E. D., Malcolm, D. C. and Atterson, J., pp. 7–19. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
König, E. and Gossow, H. 1979. Even-aged stands as habitat for deer in Central Europe. In The Ecology of Even-aged Plantations, ed. Ford, E. D., Malcolm, D. C. and Atterson, J.. pp. 429–451. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Loudon, A. 1982. Too mam deer for the trees? New Scient. 93, 708–711.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. M. 1977. Living with deer in the re-afforestation phase. Scott. For. 31, 170–175.Google Scholar
Maxwell, H. A. 1967. Red deer and forestry with special reference to the Highlands of Scotland. Deer 1, 126–130.Google Scholar
McIntyre, E. B. 1975. Barkstripping by ungulates. Ph.D. thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B., Staines, B. W. and Welch, D. 1977. The Ecology of Red Deer: a research review relevant to their management in Scotland. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. and McCowan, D. 1980. Estimating and comparing population densities of red deer Cervus elaphus L. in concealing habitats. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Annual Report 1979. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Neff, D. J. 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Mgmt 32, 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, S. M. 1951. History oj Glenbranter Forest 1921–1951. Mimeographed report. Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, P. R. In press. Population density and reproduction of red deer in Scottish commercial forests. Acta Zool. Fenn.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, P. R. and Staines, B. W. 1982. Red deer in woodlands: Research findings. In Roe and red deer in British forestry, pp. 42–53. Warminster, Wilts.: British Deer Society.Google Scholar
Staines, B. W., Catt, D. C., Welch, D. and Scott, D. 1982. Red deer and forestry: current work by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. Deer 5, 400–402.Google Scholar
Staines, B. W., Crisp, J. and Parish, T. 1982. Differences in the quality of food eaten by red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags and hinds in winter. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. 1979. The effect of bark stripping on the growth and timber volume of Norway spruce. B.Sc. thesis. University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar