Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:15:31.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—Genetics of Gametes. IV. The Phenotype of Mouse Spermatozoa in Four Inbred Strains and their F1 Crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

K. N. Sharma
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
Get access

Synopsis

The expression of heritable variation in mammals is usually studied among the attributes of the adult; for example, in the body weight, milk yield, or colour of the pelt. A relatively new subject of study is that of heritable variation in the characteristics of gametes. It is of particular interest, because such variation in gametes may affect their fertility, which in turn might have repercussions on both fundamental and applied genetics. Current research is directed mainly to surveying the ways in which spermatozoa are subject to genetic influences. In the present work, heritable variations in the spermatozoa of mice are demonstrated, in the form of differences between inbred strains. The results are in virtually complete agreement with those of a previous study. It has also been found that variation in first generation crosses made from the pure strains can be largely accounted for by a blending inheritance of the characteristics of the parental types, together with an effect of heterosis. This appears to be the first demonstration in gametes of the phenomenon of heterosis, which is nearly but not quite the same as “hybrid vigour”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Beatty, R. A., 1957. “Genetics of Mammalian Gametes”, Res. Rep. 19551957, Inst. Anim. Genet., Edin.. (Edited Waddington, C. H.), 46–48.Google Scholar
Beatty, R. A., and Napier, R. A. N., 1960 a. “Genetics of Gametes. I. A Quantitative Analysis of Five Characteristics of Rabbit Spermatozoa”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, 68, 116.Google Scholar
Beatty, R. A., and Napier, R. A. N., 1960 b.Genetics of Gametes. II. Strain Differences in Characteristics of Rabbit Spermatozoa”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., B, 68, 1724.Google Scholar
Beatty, R. A., and Sharma, K. N., 1960. “Genetics of Gametes. III. Strain Differences in Spermatozoa from Eight Inbred Strains of Mice”, Proc. Roy. Soc, Edin., B, 68, 2553.Google Scholar
Braden, A. W. H., 1956. Studies on Mammalian Ova. Ph.D. Thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Braden, A. W. H., 1959. “Strain Differences in the Morphology of the Gametes of the Mouse”, Austr.J. Biol. Set., 12, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B., 1955. “Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests”, Biometrics, 11, 112.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W., 1958. “Cell Size and Number in Relation to Heterosis and Size Variation in Drosophila”, Proc. X Int. Congr. Genet., Vol. II, Montreal, 238239.Google Scholar
Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. C. R., 1955. “Studies in Quantitative Inheritance. VIII. Further Analysis of Heterosis in Crosses between Inbred Lines of Drosophila melanogaster”, Zeit. Indukt. Abstamm.-u. VererbLehre., 86, 439458.Google ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W., 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th Ed. Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar