Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-7r68w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-03T16:03:10.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ombrogenous mires in Islay and Mull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

R. A. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Nature Conservancy Council, 19 Belgrave Square, London SW1X8PY
J. Riggall
Affiliation:
Nature Conservancy Council, 19 Belgrave Square, London SW1X8PY
E. M. Bignal
Affiliation:
Nature Conservancy Council, Lochgilphead, Quinhill, Clachan, Tarbert, Argyll
Get access

Synopsis

The vegetation and surface structure of two ombrogenous mires from the Inner Hebrides are described. Two-way indicator species analysis and hand sorting of these data are used to identify vegetation communities. The surface patterning of both sites is examined using levelling data which are related to the water table. From this, four significant surface features are recognised: hummock, ridge, hollow and pool. The relationship between the vegetation communities and these features is examined, and the two study sites subsequently compared in terms of these small-scale features. The ombrogenous mires of the Inner Hebrides are then related in the same way to other mire systems described by previous authors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, E. and Pidgeon, I. M. 1942. A new quantitative method of analysis of plant communities. Aust. J. Sci. 5, 19.Google Scholar
Bellamy, D. J. 1959. The occurrence of Schoenus nigricans on ombrogenous peats. Nature, Lond. 184, 15901591.Google Scholar
Birks, H. J. B. 1973. Past and Present Vegetation of the Isle of Skye. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Birse, E. L. and Robertson, J. S. 1976. Vegetation. In The Soils of the Country round Perth, Arbroath and Dundee, 163166 (Memoirs of the Soil Survey of Great Britain) Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Boatman, D. J. 1957. An ecological study of two areas of blanket bog on the Galway-Mayo peninusla, Ireland. Proc. Roy. Ir. Acad. B 59, 2942.Google Scholar
Boatman, D. J. 1962. The growth of Schoenus nigricans on blanket peats. I. The response to pH and the level of potassium and magnesium. J. Ecol. 50, 823832.Google Scholar
Boatman, D. J. 1972. The growth of Schoenus nigricans on blanket bog peats. II. Growth on Irish and Scottish peats. J. Ecol. 60, 469477.Google Scholar
Boatman, D. J. and Armstrong, W. 1968. A bog type in NW Sutherland. J. Ecol. 56, 129141.Google Scholar
Boatman, D. J. Goode, D. A. and Hulme, P. D. 1981. The Silver Flowe. III. Pattern development on Long Loch B and Craigeazle mires. J. Ecol. 69, 897918.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G. and Warburg, E. F. 1962. Flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, R. E. 1978. Floristic analyses of British mires and mires communities. J. Ecol. 66, 773802.Google Scholar
Eddy, A. 1977. Sphagnum subsecundum agg. in Britain. J. Bryol. 9, 303319.Google Scholar
Gimingham, C. H., Miller, G. R., Sleigh, L. M. and Milne, L. M. 1961. The Ecology of a small bog in Kinlochewe Forest, Wester Ross. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 39, 125147.Google Scholar
Godwin, H. and Conway, V. M. 1939. The ecology of a raised bog near Tregaron, Cardiganshire. J. Ecol. 27, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, D. A. 1970. Ecological studies on the Silver Flowe Nature Reserve. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of Hull.Google Scholar
Goode, D. A. 1972. Criteria for the selection of peatland nature reserves in Britain. Proc. 4th Int. Peat Congr. I–IV, Helsinki, pp. 167177.Google Scholar
Goode, D. A. and Lindsay, R. A. 1979. The peatland vegetation of Lewis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 77B, 279293.Google Scholar
Goodwillie, R. 1980. European Peatlands. Nature and Environment Series, No. 19, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN—A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivahate Data in an Ordered Two-Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Jermy, A. C. and Crabbe, J. A. (ed) 1978. The Island of Mull: A Survey of its Flora and its Environment. London; Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Kershaw, K. A. 1973. Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Moore, J. J. 1964. The regional distribution of the bogs in Ireland. Proc. 8th Int. Congr. IGM, 87–90.Google Scholar
Moore, J. J. 1968. The classification of the bogs and wet heaths of Northern Europe (Oxycocco-Sphagnetea) In Pflanzensoziologische Systematik, ed. Tuxen, R. pp. 306320. The Hague: Junk.Google Scholar
Moore, P. D. and Bellamy, D. J. 1973. Peatlands. London: Elek.Google Scholar
O'Hare, P. J. 1968. The presence of Schoenus nigricans on acid blanket bog in Western Ireland. In Trans. 2nd Int. Peat Congr. Leningrad, 1963, ed. Robertson, R. pp. 199209. Edinburgh: HMSO.Google Scholar
Paton, J. A. 1965. Census Catalogue of British Hepatics, 4th edn London: British Bryological Society.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W. H. 1956. Two blanket bogs in Sutherland. J. Ecol. 44, 493516.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. 1964. Mires and Bogs. In: The Vegetation of Scotland, ed. Burnett, J. H. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. (Ed.) 1977. A Nature Conservation Review. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D. A. and Walker, D. 1958. The Silver Flowe, Galloway, Scotland. J. Ecol. 46, 407445.Google Scholar
Ruuhijarvi, R. 1960. Uber die regional Einteilung der nord-finnischen Moore. Ann. Bot. Soc. ‘Vanamo’ 31, 1360.Google Scholar
Sparling, J. H. 1962. The occurrence of Schoenus nigricans in blanket bogs of western Ireland and northwest Scotland. Nature. Lond. 195, 723724.Google Scholar
Sparling, J. H. 1967. The occurrence of Schoenus nigricans in blanket bogs.J Ecol. 55, 113, 15–31.Google Scholar
Warburg, E. F. 1963. Census Catalogue of British Mosses, 3rd edn. London: British Bryological Society.Google Scholar