Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T06:24:25.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ozone- and UV-stress detected by photon emission of plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

R. Katzinger ,
H. Klima  and
H. Schwabl
R. Katzinger
Affiliation:
Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten Schüttelstraße 115, A-1020 Wien, Austria
H. Klima
Affiliation:
Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten Schüttelstraße 115, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
H. Schwabl
Affiliation:
Atominstitut der Österreichen Universitäten Schilttelstraße115, A-1020 Wien, Austria
Get access

Synopsis

The photon emission (ultraweak photon emission and delayed luminescence) of duckweeds (Spirodela polyrrhiza) and 1–2 year old tree seedlings (Picea abies, Abies alba and Fagus silvatica) was investigated by means of a single photon counting equipment. The decay kinetics of DL, the temperature dependence of UPE, and the anaerobic phase-induced kinetics of UPE were measured under/after treatment with ozone and UV-radiation. The results suggest that more consideration be given to photon emission as an indicator of stress-induced changes in plants.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 102: Oxygen and Environmental Stress in Plants , 1994 , pp. 107 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeles, F. R. 1986. Plant chemiluminescence. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 37, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amesz, J. & Van Gorkom, H. J. 1978. Delayed fluorescence in photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 29, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorn, L. O. 1989. Consequences of decreased atmospheric ozone: Effects of ultraviolet radiation on plants. In: Atmospheric ozone research and its policy implications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.Google Scholar
Bohne, C., Campa, A., Cilento, G., Nassi, L. & Villablanca, M. 1986. Chlorophyll: An efficient detector of electronically excited species in biochemical systems. Analytical Biochemistry 155, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boveris, A., Varsavsky, A. I., Goncalves da Silva, S. & Sanchez, R. A. 1983. Chemiluminescence of soybean seeds: spectral analysis, temperature dependence and effect of inhibitors. Photochemistry and Photobiology 38, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hideg, E., Scott, R. Q. & Inaba, H. 1989. High resolution emission spectra of one second delayed fluorescence from chloroplasts. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 250, 275–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hideg, E., Kobayashi, & Inaba, H. 1990. Ultraweak photoemission from dark adapted leaves and isolated chloroplasts. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 275, 121–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanofsky, J. R. & Sima, P. 1991. Singlet oxygen production from the reaction of ozone with biological molecules. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 9030–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panagopoulos, I., Bornman, J. F. & Björn, L. O. 1989. The effect of UV-B and UV-C radiation on hibiscus leaves determined by ultraweak luminescence and fluorescence induction. Physiologia Plantarium 76, 461–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattemeyer, M. 1984. Biophotonenexperimente für ein biologisches Gammastrahlen-Dosimeter. Thesis (in German), Technical University Vienna.Google Scholar
Roschger, P., Devaraj, B., Scott, R. Q. & Inaba, H. 1992. Induction of a transient enhancement of low-level chemiluminescence in intact leaves by unaerobic treatment. Photochemistry and Photobiology 56, 281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, B. 1979. Experimental investigations on ultraweak photon emission. In Popp, F. A., Becker, G., Konig, H. L. & Peschka, W. (Eds). Electromagnetic bio-information, pp. 107–22, München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. & Schneckenburger, H. 1992. Time-resolving luminescence techniques for possible detection of forest decline. I. Long term delayed luminescence. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 31, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, R. Q., Usa, M. & Inaba, H. 1989. Ultraweak emission imagery of mitosing soybeans. Applied Physics B48, 183–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, J. 1988. Luminescence research and its relation to ultraweak cell radiation. Experientia 44, 559–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Slawinski, J. & Popp, F. A. 1987. Temperature hysteresis of low level luminescence from plants and its thermodynamical analysis. Journal of Plant Physiology 130, 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar