Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:53:00.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—On the Interpretation of Electroencephalic Potentials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

C. A. Beevers
Affiliation:
Dewar Research Fellow, University of Edinburgh.
Get access

Extract

Electroencephalography has added another important means of investigation of cerebral activity and functioning to the many others previously at our disposal. In applying it, as with the other investigative methods, it is important that we should have clearly in mind exactly what facts it is able to demonstrate and what interpretations we are justified in making of the observed facts. This process of interpretation is difficult partly because it is a two-stage one; the electrical potentials observed are those on the surface of the scalp and these must first be referred back to potential sources (i.e. electrical charges) in the brain itself. These latter must then be interpreted in terms of activities of nerve cells and nerve fibres. The first of these two stages belongs entirely to the sphere of mathematical physics, and the present paper is an attempt to present a working hypothesis which not only suggests a solution of this stage of the problem, but suggests a probable solution of the second stage. The second stage properly belongs to the sphere of physiology, but progress here is rendered difficult by lack of decisive knowledge as to the nature of the elementary unit of central nervous activity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Adrian, E. D., and Matthews, B. H. C., 1934. “The Berger Rhythm,” Brain, LVII, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, E. D., and Yamagiwa, D., 1935. “The Origin of the Berger Rhythm,” Brain, LVIII, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvanitaki, , 1942. “Effects evoked in an Axon by Activity of a Contiguous One,” Journ. Neuro-physiol., V, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, D. H., and Matthews, B. H. C., 1938. “Interpretation of Potential Changes in the Spinal Cord,” Journ. Physiol., XCII, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, H., 1933. “Ueber das Elektrenkephalogram des Menschen,” Arch. Psych. Nervenkr., XCIX, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, R. W., and Libet, B., 1940. “The Control of Normal and ‘Convulsive’ Brain Potentials,” Amer. Journ. Psychiatr., XCVI, 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, F. A., Gibbs, E. L., and Lennox, W. G., 1937. “Epilepsy: a Paroxysmal Cerebral Dysrhythmia,” Brain, LX, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinker, R. R., and Serota, H., 1938. “Studies on Cortico-hypothalamic Relations,” Journ. Neurophysiol., I, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, H. H., and Andrews, H. L., 1938. “Electroencephalography: Normal Differentiation of Occipital and Precentral Regions in Man,” Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr., XXXIX, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, H. H., and Kershman, J., 1941. “EEG Classification of the Epilepsies,” Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr., XLV, 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennard, M., 1943. “Effects on the EEG of Chronic Lesions of Basal Ganglia, Thalamus, and Hypothalamus of Monkeys,” Journ. Neurophysiol., vi, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfield, W., 1941. Epilepsy and Cerebral Localisation. Baillière Tindall & Cox, London.Google Scholar
van der Pol, and van der Mark, , 1928. “The Heartbeat as a Relaxation Oscillator and an Electrical Model of the Heart,” Phil. Mag., VI, 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohracher, H., 1937. “Ueber die Kurvenform cerebraler Potentialschwankungen,” Pflug. Arch. ges. Physiol., CCXXXVIII, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, E. A., 1937. “Comparative Study of the Thalamic, Cerebral, and Cerebellar Potentials,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., CXVIII, 570.Google Scholar
Walter, W. G., 1938. “Electroencephalography: Technique and Application,” Journ. Neurol. Psychiatr., I, 383.Google Scholar