Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T05:23:57.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regional atmospheric budgets of S and N fluxes: how well can they be quantified?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

J. N. Galloway  and
H. Rodhe
J. N. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, U.S.A.
H. Rodhe
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Synopsis

Regional atmospheric sulphur/nitrogen budgets have been used in several regions of the world to help build up an overview of fluxes, reservoir contents and turnover times, and as a basis for quantitative modelling. However, there are some deficiencies in the regional budget approach. The analysis is of necessity superficial, and can give a false impression of certainty. This paper reviews the regional budgets for sulphur/nitrogen which have been created in various regions of the world, analyses their common findings, addresses the issue of uncertainty, and recommends areas of future research.

Most regional sulphur/nitrogen budgets have been constructed for North America, northern Europe and a few in other parts of Europe. A common finding is that anthropogenic emissions are large relative to natural emissions and that there is substantial international transport. The results of the budget analysis, while having elements of uncertainty, have proved to be valuable both in the synthesis of knowledge, and in their contribution to the increased awareness among policy makers and the public at large about the long-range transport of sulphur/nitrogen emissions.

Unfortunately, there have been few regional budgets for the developing portions of the world. Given the projected increase in population – and per capita S and N emissions for these regions – we encourage a future focus on regional sulphur/nitrogen budgets for the less developed regions of the world.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 97: Acidic Deposition: Its Nature and Impacts , 1990 , pp. 61 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreae, M. O., & Andreae, T. W., 1988. The cycles of biogenic sulfur compounds over the Amazon Basin, 1. Dry season. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 1487–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asman, W. A. H., & Janssen, A. J., 1987. A long-range transport model for ammonia and ammonium for Europe. Atmospheric Environment 21, 2099–119.Google Scholar
Asman, W. A. H., Drukker, B., & Janssen, A. J., 1988. Modelled historical concentrations and depositions of ammonia and ammonium in Europe. Atmospheric Environment 22, 725–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, G. P., & Gillett, R. W., 1988. Acidification in Australia. Acidification in Tropical Countries. SCOPE Report 36, pp. 347–402, ed. In Rodhe, H., & Herrera, R., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Bhumralkar, C. M., Manscuso, R. L., Wolf, D. E., Thuillier, R. H., Nitz, K. C., & Johnson, W. B., 1980. Adaptation and Application of a long-term air pollution model ENAMAP-1 to Eastern North America, Final Report, Project 7760, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, Contract No. EPA/68–02–2959.Google Scholar
Bischoff, W. D., Patterson, V. L., & Mackenzie, F. T., 1984. Geochemical mass balance for sulfur- and nitrogen-bearing components: Eastern United States. In Geological Aspects of Acid Deposition. Acid Precipitation Ser., vol. 7, ed. Bricker, O. P., pp. 1–20, Boston, MA: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Bonis, K., 1981. The atmospheric budget of nitrogen compounds over Hungary. Idojaras 85, 149–56.Google Scholar
Bones, K., Meszaros, E., & Putsay, M., 1980. On the atmospheric budget of nitrogen compounds over Europe. Idojaras 84, 57–67.Google Scholar
Brost, R. A., Chatfield, R. B., Greenberg, J. P., Haagenson, P. L., Heikes, B. G., Madronich, S., Ridley, B. A., & Zimmerman, P. R., 1988. Three-dimensional modeling of transport of chemical species from continents to the Atlantic Ocean. Tellus 40B, 358–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G., 1987. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmosphere sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326, 655–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanning, K. A., 1989. Influence of atmospheric pollution on nutrient limitation in the ocean. Nature 339, 460–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, J. A., Kumar, S., & Golomb, D., 1986. Annual and semiannual anthropogenic sulfur budget for eastern North America. Atmospheric Environment 20, 1497–1500.Google Scholar
Fay, J. A., & Golomb, D., 1989. Interannual variability of transboundary sulfur flux, Atmospheric Environment 23, 2864–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J. N., 1989. Atmospheric acidification: Projections for the future. Ambio 18, 161–6.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. N., 1990. The intercontinental transport of sulfur and nitrogen. In The Long-Range Atmospheric Transport of Natural and Contaminant Substances, ed. Knap, A. H., pp. 87–104. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J. N., & Whelpdale, D. M., 1980. An atmospheric sulfur budget for eastern North America. Atmospheric Environment 14, 409–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, J. N., & Whelpdale, D. M., 1987. WATOX-86 overview and western North Atlantic Ocean S and N atmospheric budgets. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1, 261–81.Google Scholar
Galloway, J. N., Whelpdale, D. M., & Wolff, G. T., 1984. The flux of S and N eastward from North America. Atmospheric Environment 18, 2595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, J. A., 1977. The dry deposition of sulphur dioxide to land and water surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Meteorological Society of London (A) 354, 245–68.Google Scholar
Husar, R. B., & Holloway, J. M., 1982. Sulfur and nitrogen over North America. In Ecological Effects of Acid Deposition, pp. 95–115. Rpt. PM 1636, Stockholm: National Swedish Environment Protection Board.Google Scholar
Isaksen, I. S. A., & Hov, O., 1987. Calculation of trends in the tropospheric concentration of O3, OH, CH4 and NOx. Tellus 39B, 271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T., Saltbones, J., Sandnes, H., Eliasen, A., & Hov, O., 1989. Airborne transboundary transport of sulphur and nitrogen over Europe — Model descriptions and calculations, Report EMEP MSCW 2/89, EMEP Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43-Blindern, N–0313 Oslo 3, Norway.Google Scholar
Johansson, C., Rodhe, H., & Sanhueza, E., 1988. Emissions of NO in a tropical savanna and a cloud forest during the dry season. Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 7180–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. B., 1983. Interregional exchanges of air pollution: model types and applications. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 33, 563–74.Google Scholar
Katsoulis, B. D., & Whelpdale, D. M., 1990. Atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen budgets for southeast Europe. Atmospheric Environment 24A, 2595–70.Google Scholar
Knap, A. H., Jickells, T., Pszenny, A., & Galloway, J., 1986. Significance of atmospherically-derived fixed nitrogen on the productivity of the Sargasso Sea. Nature 320, 158–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leek, C., & Rodhe, H., 1990. Emissions of biogenic sulfur to the atmosphere of Northern Europe. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 12, 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelieveld, J., 1988. The calculation of transboundary and deposition fluxes of SO2 and sulfate by means of aircraft measurements. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 38, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. A., 1983. Nitrogen oxides in the troposphere: Global and regional budgets. Journal of Geophysical Research 88, 10, 785–10, 807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, W. T., & Dickerson, R. R., 1987. The flux of reactive nitrogen compounds from eastern North America to the western Atlantic Ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1, 329–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meszaros, E., & Varhelyi, G., 1982. An evaluation of the possible effect of anthropogenic sulfate particles on the precipitation ability of clouds over Europe. Idojaras (Journal of Hungarian Meteorological Service) 86, 76–81.Google Scholar
Möller, D., 1984. Estimation of the global man-made sulphur emissions. Atmospheric Environment 18, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Environmental Protection Board. 1987. Acidification and Air Pollution — A Brief Guide. Box 1302, S–17125, Solna, Sweden.Google Scholar
Nyberg, A., 1977. On air-borne transport of sulphur over the North Atlantic. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 103, 607–15.Google Scholar
Olson, M. P., 1989. Author's reply to “Interannual Variability of Transboundary Sulfur Flux”, Atmospheric Environment 23, 2865–7.Google Scholar
Olson, M. P., & Oikawa, K. K., 1989. Interannual variability of transboundary sulphur flux. Atmospheric Environment 23, 333–40.Google Scholar
Olson, M. P., Voldner, E. C., & Oikawa, K. K., 1982. A computed sulphur budget for the eastern Canadian provinces. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 18, 139–55.Google Scholar
Olson, M. P., Bottenheim, J. W., & Oikawa, K. K., 1989. Nitrogen budget for eastern Canada. In Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application VII, pp. 187–94. ed. van Dop, H. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, G. P., & Rosswall, T., 1986. Nitrogen in West Africa. The regional cycle. Ecological Monograph 56, 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhe, H., 1972. A study of the sulfur budget for the atmosphere over Northern Europe. Tellus 24, 128–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhe, H., 1976. An atmosphere sulfur budget for NW Europe. In N, P, S Global Cycles, ed., Svensson, B. H., & Soderlund, R., pp. 123–8. Ecological Bulletins No 22, SCOPE Report 7. Published by Swedish Natural Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Rodhe, H., 1978. Budgets and turn-over times of atmospheric sulfur compounds. Atmospheric Environment 12, 671–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhe, H., & Granat, L., 1983. Summer and winter budgets for sulfur over Europe; an indication of large seasonal variations of residence time. Idöjaras (Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service) 87, 1–6.Google Scholar
Rodhe, H., Cowling, E., Galbally, I., Galloway, J., & Herrera, R., 1988. Acidification and regional air pollution in the tropics. In Acidification in Tropical Countries, ed., Rodhe, H., & Herrera, R., pp. 3–39. SCOPE Report 36. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Rodhe, H., Galloway, J. N., & Dianwu, Z., 1990. Acidification in the tropics — prospects for the coming decades. Ambio (submitted).Google Scholar
Ryaboshapko, A. G., 1983. The atmospheric sulfur cycle. In The Global Biogeochemical Sulfur Cycle, eds, Ivanov, M. V., & Freney, J. R., pp. 203–96. SCOPE Report 19. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. E., 1988. Are global cloud albedo and climate controlled by marine phytoplankton? Nature 336, 441–5.Google Scholar
Shannon, J. D., 1980. The Advanced Statistical Trajectory Regional Air Pollution Model. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Turbulence, Diffusion, and Air Pollution, American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp. 376–80.Google Scholar
Shannon, J. D., 1981. A model of regional long-term average sulfur atmopsheric pollution, surface removal, and net horizontal flux. Atmospheric Environment 15, 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shnnon, J. D., & Lescht, M. M., 1986. Modelled trends and climatological variability of the net transboundary mass flux of airborne sulfur between the United States and Canada. Paper presented at the Specialty Conference on Meteorology of Acidic Deposition, Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Albany, N.Y., March 18.Google Scholar
Söderlund, R., 1977. NOx, pollutants and ammonia emissions — A mass balance for the atmosphere over NW Europe. Ambio 16, 118–22.Google Scholar
Summers, P. W., 1990. An updated atmospheric sulphur budget for eastern North America ca. 1985—1987 based on observations, Table 3.2.14. In: Lusis M. A., and Philips M. L., 1990. Canadian long range transport of air pollutants and acid deposition assessment report. Part III. Atmospheric Sciences. Pub. by Federal/Provincial Research and Monitoring Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretariat, 1983. Populations Bulletin of the United Nations, No. 14, p. 24. New York: U.N.Google Scholar
Varhelyi, G., 1982. On the atmospheric sulfur budget over Hungary. Idöjaras 86, 333–7.Google Scholar
Vasilenko, V. N., Karabanj, R. T., Nazarov, I. M., & Fridman, Sh. D., 1988. Atmospheric budget of sulfur and nitrogen over the USSR territory and loading on the forest ecosystems and soil. Proceedings of Canada–USSR Symposium on Monitoring and Environmental Protection, Tbilisi, USSR, 11–17 April.Google Scholar
Voldner, E. C., Olson, M. P., Oikawa, K., & Loiselle, M., 1981. Comparison between measured and computed concentrations of sulphur compounds in Eastern North America. Journal of Geophysical Research 86, 5339–46.Google Scholar
Whelpdale, D. M., Eliassen, A., Galloway, J. N., Dovland, H., & Miller, J., 1988. The transatlantic transport of sulfur. Tellus 40B, 1–15.Google Scholar
World Resources, 1989. World Resources 1988–1989. A report by the World Resources Institute-and the International Institute for Environment and Development, p. 17. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
Zavodsky, D., & Mitosinkova, M., 1984. Estimation of atmospheric budget of nitrogen compounds over Czechoslovakia. Idöjaras 88, 202–9.Google Scholar