Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:19:25.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIII.—The Polysaccharides Synthesized by Monodus subterraneus when Grown on Artificial Media under Bacteria-free Conditions.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Anne Beattie  and
Elizabeth Percival
Anne Beattie
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh
Elizabeth Percival
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Synopsis

This paper describes the isolation and characterization of the polysaccharides synthesized by the unicellular organism, Monodus subterraneus. Complete extraction of polysaccharide material proved difficult and the method finally adopted, after removal of colouring matter by immersion in dimethyl sulphoxide, was successive extractions with (i) cold water, (ii) hot water, (iii) aqueous ethanol, (iv) chlorite solution, and (v) dilute alkali. The major polysaccharide, isolated from (v), is a glucan. It was shown by periodate oxidation, methylation and enzymic studies to consist mainly of β-l, 4-linked glucose units. The presence of a small proportion of β-1, 3-linked glucose units, either incorporated with the β-1, 4-linked units in a single polymer of the lichenin-type or in a separate polymer of the laminarin-type, was also established. Further small quantities of this mixed glucan were also deposited from (ii) and from (iii) on keeping these extracts in the cold. Heterogeneous crude polysaccharide material was isolated from (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) by alcohol precipitation. The sugars present in these various precipitates and their respective oxopolysaccharides were identified chromatographically, and, in the case of the major constituents, separated and characterized as crystalline derivatives. The polysaccharide extracted by cold water was found to contain glucose, mannose, galactose, xylose and 12 per cent of sulphate; that extracted by hot water comprised glucose (major), galactose (major), and possibly fucose; and that extracted by chlorite solution consisted of glucose (major), xylose (major), ribose and a trace of galactose.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , 1962 , pp. 171 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Archibald, A. R., Manners, D. J., and Riley, J. F., 1958. Chem. & Ind., 1516.Google Scholar
Aspinall, G. O., and Ferrier, R. J., 1957. Chem. & Ind., 1216.Google Scholar
Beattie, A., Hirst, E. L., and Elizabeth, Percival, 1961. Biochem. J., 79, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, C. T., and Cooper, F. P., 1960. Canad.J. Chem., 38, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breddy, L. J., and Jones, J. K. N., 1945. J. Chem. Soc, 738.Google Scholar
Chanda, N. B., Hirst, E. L., and Manners, D. J., 1957. J. Chem. Soc, 1951.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. S., and Elizabeth, Percival, 1957. J. Chem. Soc, 2666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, G. F., and Miller, J. D. A., 1957. Arch. Mikrobiol., 28, 1.Google Scholar
Frisell, W. R., Meech, L. A., and Mackenzie, C. G., 1954. J. Biol. Chem., 207, 709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch, F. E., 1935. The Structure and Reproduction of the Algœ, I, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaillard, , Blanche, D. E., 1961. Nature, Lond., 191, 1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, L., Powell, D. B., and Woods, B. M., 1956. J. Chem. Soc, 4799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, L., and Perry, M. B., 1956. Chem. & Ind., 768.Google Scholar
Jones, A. S., and Letham, D. S., 1954.. Chem. & Ind., 662.Google Scholar
Keilin, D., and Hartree, E. F., 1948. Biochem. J., 42, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, I. M., and Elizabeth, Percival, 1959. J. Chem. Soc, 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. H., and Gürtler, P., 1947. Helv. Chim. Ada, 30, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolai, E., and Preston, R. D., 1952. Proc. Roy. Soc, B, 140, 244.Google Scholar
Nunn, J. R., and (Mrs.) Von Holdt, M. M., 1957. J. Chem. Soc, 1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, J. J., and Elizabeth, Percival, 1959. J. Chem. Soc, 2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, S., Whelan, W. J., and Roberts, J. G., 1957. J. Chem. Soc, 3916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, S., Whelan, W. J., and Lawley, H. G., 1958. J. Chem. Soc, 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlin, A. S., and Suzuki, S., 1962. Canad. J. Chem., 40, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J. B., 1932. Arch. Protistenk., 76, 395.Google Scholar
Smith, F., and Unrau, A. M., 1959. Chem. & Ind., 636, 881.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M., 1952. J. Biol. Chem., 195, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, E. T., and Guthrie, J. D., 1944. Industr. Engng. Chem. (Anal.), 16, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Stosch, H., 1951. Naturwissenschaften, 38, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrom, M. L., 1930. J. Amer. Chem. Soc, 52, 2466.Google Scholar