Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T22:21:35.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Craniological Observations on the Lengths, Breadths, and Heights of a Hundred Australian Aboriginal Crania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

A. W. D. Robertson
A. W. D. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department of the University of Melbourne.
Get access

Extract

The present work forms the first portion of an investigation into the craniological characters of the Australian aboriginal crania at present being conducted by the author, and is part of a general scheme for the osteological investigation of the Australian aboriginal initiated by the Professor of Anatomy in the University of Melbourne.

There are, as is well known, two methods of treating craniometric statistics, and which, for convenience, may be designated (1) The Empirical Method; (2) The Rational Method.

The object aimed at in both is to find numbers that shall be characteristic of the race of any country.

“The Empirical method places very little value on the length and breadth of a skull except as a means of arriving at their ratio—the cephalic index—‘the subdivisions of which,’ says Gray (15), ‘are all arbitrary.’ Some, e.g. Retzius, made use of centres; others, e.g. Welcker, made use of limits, and there appears to be no special reason for fixing the limits of the groups at one index more than another. The analysis of craniometrical statistics by this method becomes comparatively simple: calculate the cephalic index and other indices for each individual, and find the average or mean index for the whole group of people measured. The highest and lowest index is usually stated as indicating the range of variation on each side of the mean. As the range of variation of the cephalic index is usually quite as great as the range of variation of the absolute dimensions, it is difficult to understand the belief in the value of indices of the Empirical school.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 31 , 1912 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Fawcett, and Lee, , “A Second Study of the Variation and Correlation of the Human Skull, with special reference to the Naquada Crania”, Biometrika, vol. i. p. 408.Google Scholar
(2) MacDonnell, W. E., “A Study of the Variation and Correlation of Human Skulls, with special reference to English Crania”, Biometrika, vol. iii. p. 190.Google Scholar
(3) Stieda, , “Ueber die Anwendung der Wahrscheinlickkeitsrechnung in der Anthropologischen”, Statidik Archiv für Anthropologie, Bd. xiv. S. 167–182.Google Scholar
(4) Quetelet, , Lettres sur la Théorie des Probabilités, 1846.Google Scholar
(5) Galton, Francis, Biometrika, vol. i.Google Scholar
(6) Galton, Franois, National Inheritance.Google Scholar
(7) Pearson, Karl, The Chances of Death, vol. i. pp. 256–372.Google Scholar
(8) Pearson, Karl, “Repression, Heredity, and Panmixia”, Phil. Trans., vol. clxxxvii. A, pp. 279–281.Google Scholar
(9) Pearson, Karl, “Correlation Values of Length, Breadth, and Height, and Two Cephalic Indices”, Spurious Correlation, Proc. Roy. Soc., vol. lx. p. 495.Google Scholar
(10) Pearson, Karl, Note on Dr Keith's Review of Professor Arthur Thomson's “The Ancient Races of the Thebaid”, Man, vol. v., 1905, No. 65.Google Scholar
(11) Pearson, Karl, “Homogeneity and Heterogeneity in Collections of Crania”, Craniological Notes, 11, Biometrika, vol. ii. p. 511.Google Scholar
(12) Lee, Alice, “Data for the Problem of Evolution in Man, vi.: A First Study of the Correlation of the Human Skull”, Phil. Trans., vol. cxcvi. A, pp. 225–264.Google Scholar
(13) Lee, and Pearson, , “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution, Relative Variation, and Correlation in Civilised and Uncivilised Races”, Phil. Trans., 1895, A, vol. clxxxvi.Google Scholar
(14) Boas, Franz, “Heredity in Head Form”, American Anthropologist, vol. i. p. 453.Google Scholar
(15) Gray, John, “The Analysis of Anthropometric Statistics”, Proc. Anat. and Anthrop. Soc. Aberdeen, 1902–1904, p. 85.Google Scholar
(16) Parsons, F. G., “Report on Hythe Crania”, Journ. Roy. Anthrop. Instit. Great Britain and Ireland, vol. xxxviii., 1908, pp. 419–424,Google Scholar
(17) Klaatsch, Herman, Reports from Pathological Laboratory of the Lunacy Department of N.S.W., vol. i., pt. iii., 1908.Google Scholar
(18) Turner, W. M. Sir, “A Contribution to the Craniology of the People of Scotland”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xl, pt. iii., pp. 547–613.Google Scholar
(19) Myers, C. S., “Review of Fawcett and Lee's Second Study of the Human Skull”, Maw, 1903, No. 13.Google Scholar
(20) International Agreement for the Unification of Craniometrical and Cephalometrical Measurements, Monaco, 1906.Google Scholar
(21) The Anatomical Record, “On the Preservation of Data used in Biometric Investigations”, vol. iii., N.o. 3, Mar. 1909. Published by the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(22) Ellis, Havelock, Man and Woman.Google Scholar
(23) Warren, Ernst, “An Investigation on the Variability of the Human Skeleton, with especial reference to the Naquada Race”, Phil. Trans., B, vol. clxxxix.Google Scholar
(24) Martin, Rud., “Systemder (Physichen) Anthropologie und Anthropologische Bibliographie”. Souderabdruck aus dem Korrespondenzblatt der Deutschen Anthropologischen Gesellschaft xxxviii., Jahrgang, cxc, Nr. 9–12.Google Scholar
(25) Bartel, Paul, “Über Geschlechtsunterschiede am Schädel”, Inaug. Diss., Berlin, 1897.Google Scholar
(26) Beery, Robertson, and Cross, , “A Biometrical Study of the Relative Degree of Purity of Race of the Tasmanian, Australian, and Papuan”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxi., 1910.Google Scholar
(27) Smith, S. A., Unpublished Work on Melanesians, University of Sydney.Google Scholar