Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T14:27:08.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Methods of Standardising Suprarenal Preparations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

I. D. Cameron
Affiliation:
Assistant to the Lecturer on Physiology, Edinburgh School of Medicine for Women.
Get access

Summary

For the standardisation of adrenalin preparations.

(a) The colorimetric method is not reliable with weak or impure solutions.

(b) The effect on the pupil of the frog's eye gives uncertain results.

(c) The determination of the minimum effective dose on the arterioles of the perfused frog is tedious and uncertain; on an average 0·1 per million produces an effect.

(d) The determination of the minimum effective dose in causing a rise on the blood pressure of the atropinised rabbit yields fairly satisfactory results.

(e) Adrenalin, suprarenalin, and hemisine all give a precisely similar result, 0·0003 mg. per kilo of body weight, or 0·006 per million, of the rabbit's blood causing a distinct rise in the blood pressure in the rabbit, and 0·012 mg. per kilo of body weight, or 0·24 per million, of the blood causing a rise in the cat.

(f) The most satisfactory method is the determination of the dose just sufficient to antagonise 0·6 mg. of nitroglycerin (Parke, Davis & Co.). Of adrenalin, 0·0075 mg. is sufficient.

I wish to express my indebtedness to Dr Noël Paton for much help in the preparation of this paper.

The expenses of this research were defrayed from a grant made to the Laboratory by Mr J. Francis Mason for investigations on the physiology of the ductless glands.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 157 note * American Journal of Pharmacy, 1901, p. 523.

page 157 note † Arch. f. Exper. Path., xxxv. p. 213.

page 157 note ‡ Proc. of Roy. Soc, Oct. 7, 1905, p. 491.

page 158 note * Compt. Rend. Soc. de Biolog., 1902, p. 571.

page 158 note † Arch. f. Experim. Path. u. Pharmak., Bd. li., S. 415.

page 159 note * Journal of Physiology, vol. xxxii. p. 447.

page 161 note * Douglas, , Journal of Physiology, vol. xxxiii. p. 493.Google Scholar

page 161 note † Loc. cit.

page 161 note ‡ Arch, intern, de Pharmac. et de Thérap., li. p. 304, and C. R. Soc. Biol., 1904, p. 665.

page 161 note § Text-booh of Physiology, vol. i. p. 957.

page 162 note * In all traces time is marked in half-minutes.

page 163 note * Journal of Anatomy and Physiology, vol. xxi. p. 225.

page 163 note † Practitioner, vol. xxx., 1883, p. 422.

page 163 note ‡ Journal of Physiology, 1897–98, p. 1.

page 165 note * Loc. cit.

page 165 note † Brit. Med. Journal, vol. i., 1893, p. 1305.

page 165 note ‡ Loc. cit.

page 166 note * Journal of Anatomy mid Physiology, vol. v. p. 92.

page 166 note † Loc. cit.

page 167 note * Loc. cit.

page 167 note † Loc. cit.

page 169 note * Top line is the respirations.