Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:46:36.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VI.—Ovarian Rhythm in Drosophila

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

H. P. Donald
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh
Rowena Lamy
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

While observations were being carried out on the fecundity of certain experimental Drosophila pseudo-obscura females, it became apparent that there was a regular alternation of periods of rapid laying with periods of no laying. Since an irregularity in rate of oviposition in this species had been noticed by other investigators, and since, under similar circumstances, Drosophila melanogaster lays approximately the same number of eggs each day, it was decided to investigate more closely the possibility that differences in laying habit existed among the various species.

Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Adolf, E. F., 1920. “Egg Laying Reactions in the Pomace Fly, Drosophila,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. xxxi, pp. 327341.Google Scholar
Alpatov, W. W., 1932. “Egg Production in Drosophila melanogaster and some Factors which influence it,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. lxiii, pp. 85111.Google Scholar
Back, E. A., and Pemberton, C. E., 1914. “Life History of the Melon Fly,” Journ. Agric. Res., vol. iii, pp. 269274.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th., 1935. “Fecundity in Drosophila pseudo-obscura at Different Temperatures,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. lxxi, pp. 449464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G., 1935. “A Hormone causing Pupation in the Blow-fly, Calliphora erythrocephala,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B, vol. cxviii, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Guyénot, E., 1912. “Études biologiques sur une Mouche, Drosophila ampelophila Löw. I. Possibilité de vie aseptique pour l'individu et la lignée,” pp. 9799. “II. Rôle des levures dans l'alimentation,” pp. 178–180. “III. Changement de milieu et adaptation,” pp. 223–225. “IV. Nutrition des larves et fécondité,” pp. 270–272. “V. Nutrition des adultes et fécondité,” pp. 332–334. “VI. Résorption des spermatozoides et avortements des œufs,” pp. 389–391. “VII. Le déterminisme de la ponte,” pp. 443–445. C.R. Soc. de Biol., vol. lxxiv.Google Scholar
Hanson, F. B., and Ferris, F. R., 1929. “A Quantitative Study of Fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. liv, pp. 485506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. H., Bridges, C. B., and Sturtevant, A. H., 1925. “The Genetics of Drosophila,” Bibliographia Genetica, vol. ii.Google Scholar
Nonidez, J. F., 1920. “The Internal Phenomena of Reproduction in Drosophila,” Biol. Bull., vol. xxxix, pp. 207230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, R., 1928. The Rate of Living. London: University Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, R., 1932. “The Influence of Density of Population upon Egg Production in Drosophila melanogaster,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. lxiii, pp. 5784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saveliev, V., 1928. “On the Manifold Effects of the Gene ‘vestigial’ in Drosophila melanogaster,” Trav. Soc. Nat. Leningrad, vol. lxiii, pp. 6568. (Russian.)Google Scholar
Shapiro, H., 1932. “The Rate of Oviposition in the Fruit Fly, Drosophila,” Biol. Bull., vol. lxiii, pp. 456471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H., 1921. “The North American Species of Drosophila,” Publ. Carnegie Inst. Washington, No. 301, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1934. “The Physiology of Ecdysis in Rhodinus Prolixus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling Moulting and ‘Metamorphosis’”, Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxxvii, pp. 191222.Google Scholar