Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T01:22:32.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thursday, 2nd May, 1912

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2010

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 266 note 1 The ‘bloom’ has lately been thoroughly examined by Sir Hugh Bell and Mr. J. E. Stead, F.R.S., who communicated a note on it to the Iron and Steel Institute, which will appear in the forthcoming number of the Institute's Journal.

page 269 note 1 Compare the ornament on altars from Lanchester and Aesica.

page 271 note 1 Jacobi, Kastell Zugmantel, pl. xi. 22; Mettler, Kastell Jagsthausen, pl. iii. 10; Engelhardt, Vimose Fundet; Salin, Altgerm. Tierornamentik, p. 105; Pič, Urnengräber Böhmens, pl. lxiv, lxxix; Niessen-Sammhmg (ed. 1911), no. 3737, where it is explained as tlie mounting of an ‘Eimerchen’, for which compare H. Willers, Neue Untersuchungen, pl. iv. 2. Pič's specimens have a rather different form; he explains them as ‘Schildhalter’ but hardly proves his case.

page 272 note 1 See his report, to be printed in the second volume of the Journal of Roman Stadies.

page 276 note 1 Description of the … rites … of Durham before the Suppression, written in 1593. Surtees Society Publications, xv, p. 4. 1842.