No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Thursday, February 15th, 1900
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2010
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0950797300005618/resource/name/firstPage-S0950797300005618a.jpg)
- Type
- Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1901
References
page 88 note * The Runic Monuments, ii. 648–654.
page 88 note † Mr. Hodgson Hinde says : “There seems no foundation for the story.” See The Pipe Rolls for Cumberland, published by the Society of Antiquaries Newcastle-on-Tyne, Introduction, p. 1. Also the Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archæological Society, i. 97, and iv. 456–7.
page 89 note * The Runic Monuments, iii. 310–11.
page 89 note † His reasons are given in the work just published on The Early Sculptured Stones of Cumberland and Westmorland, by Lhe Rev. W. S. Calverley, late vicar of Aspatria; edited by W. G. Collingwood, M.A. A copy is in the library of the Society of Antiquaries.
page 90 note * For example, in the Archœological Journal, x. 1–22, 124–135, 217–235, and 345–352, Mr. Maughan traces with great elaboration the course of the Maiden Way from the Roman station of Borcovicus through the parish of Lanercost and Bewcastle. Recent excavations and inquiries by the Cumberland Excavation Committee have proved that this road has no existence, whatever in the parish of Bewcastle. See the report of the Cumberland Excavation Committee for 1896 by our Fellow, Mr. F. Haverfield, printed in Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archæological Society, xiv. 413.
page 90 note * Archœologia Æliana, N.S. vii. 82–85.
page 90 note † In Runic Monuments, ii. 648–654.
page 90 note § Transactions, i. 319–321
page 91 note * The Runic Monuments, in. 310.