Article contents
“The Organ of an Individual”: William Lloyd Garrison and the Liberator
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2009
Extract
The political agenda of William Lloyd Garrison and his adherents within the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society (MASS) can be reconstructed with the rhetoric and practices of print culture, starting with its assumption that the prospects for the slaves' emancipation waxed and waned with the proliferation of writing. In the mid-1830s, the MASS mailed antislavery publications in mass quantities to civic leaders, newspaper editors, and post offices in both the North and South. In 1837 alone, it issued 711, 277 publications, which Garrison noted were falling “thicker than raindrops … nourishing the soil of freedom.” Although their publicity campaign elicited a hostile reaction from political officials, newspaper editors, and most infamously, violent mobs, the abolitionists persisted. A typical budget for the MASS allotted far more money to printing and distribution than any other expenditure, including the remuneration of their often imperiled traveling agents.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998
References
NOTES
1. Garrison, William Lloyd to Phillips, Wendell, 06 4, 1839Google Scholar, in A House Divided Against Itself, vol. 2 of The Letters of William Lloyd Garrison, ed. Merrill, Walter and Ruchames, Louis (Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard University Press, 1971), 488s.Google Scholar
2. For the extent of the abolitionists' publicity campaign and its reaction, see Savage, W. Sherman, The Controversy Over the Distribution of Abolitionist Literature, 1830–80 (Association of Negro Life and History, 1938), 92Google Scholar; Richards, Leonard, Gentleman of Property and Standing: Anti-Abolitionist Mobs in Jacksonian America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; and Ratner, Lorman, Powder Keg: Northern Opposition to the Antislavery Movement, 1831–1840. New York: Basic, 1968.Google Scholar In 1837, $1448 of the MASS budget was spent on printing, by far the largest expenditure. See Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society at its Annual Meeting, in Annual Report of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society, 1837 (1831–1853; rept. Westport, Conn.: Negro University Press, 1970), 1Google Scholar: xiv (hereafter cited as Proceedings with year).
3. Garrison, William Lloyd, “The Triumph of Mobocracy,” in Selections from the Writings and Speeches of William Lloyd Garrison. 1852; rept. New York: Negro University Press, 1968., 380Google Scholar; also published in the Liberator, 11 7, 1835, 3.Google Scholar
4. Cf. Nord, David Paul, “Tocqueville, Garrison, and the Perfection of Journalism,” Journalism History 13 (1986): 56–63.Google Scholar Nord argues that the Liberator approximated the antebellum ideal of the “voluntary association” in print, whereas this account stresses the newspaper's 18th-century public ideal.
5. Proceedings of 1837, xxxiv.Google Scholar
6. “The Liberator, alias the Disorganizer,” Liberator, 11 11, 1842, 4.Google Scholar This reprint follows Garrison's practice of publicizing any mention of the newspaper, however hostile. For the significance of this practice in spreading the repute of the Liberator, see Thomas, John L., The Liberator: William Lloyd Garrison (New York: Hill and Wang, 1966), 131–35.Google Scholar
7. Proceedings of 1837, xxxvi.Google Scholar
8. Garrison, William Lloyd to Child, David Lee, 06 12, 1842Google Scholar, in No Union With Slaveholders, vol. 3 of Merrill, and Ruchames, Louis, Letters of William Lloyd Garrison, 161.Google Scholar
9. See Warner, Michael, The Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth Century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar; and Brown, Richard D., Knowledge Is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1770–1865. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar Both accounts can claim lineage to Habermas, Jurgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
10. See a seminal critique of William Lloyd Garrison's influence and of the term in Barnes, Gilbert, The Anti-Slavery Impulse, 1830–44. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1961., 51.Google Scholar
11. My interest here is in the debate between Americanist scholars seeking a liberal-republican synthesis to describe historical and conceptual change. See Shalhope, Robert, “Republicanism, Liberalism, and Democracy: Political Culture in the New Nation,” in The Republican Synthesis Revisited: Essays in Honor of George Billias, ed. Klein, Milton et al. (Worcester, Mass.: American Antiquarian Society, 1992), 37–90Google Scholar; McCoy, Drew, The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980)Google Scholar; and Appleby, Joyce, Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
12. See Wilentz, Sean, Chants Democratic: New York City and the Rise of the American Working Class, 1788–1850 (New York: Oxford University Press), 77–87, 153–211Google Scholar; Saxton, Alexander, The Rise and Fall of the White Republic: Class Politics and Mass Culture in Nineteenth Century American (London: Verso, 1990), 95–108Google Scholar; and Schiller, Daniel, Objectivity and the News: The Public and the Rise of Commercial Journalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981., 25–31.Google Scholar For a rejoinder to the thesis that liberal Whigs monopolized the libertarian discourse of free speech during the 18th century, see Botein, Stephen, “‘Meer Mechanics’ and an Open Press: The Business and Political Strategies of Colonial American Printers,” in Perspectives in American HistoryGoogle Scholar, ed. Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernard (1975), 9: 127–228.Google Scholar
13. Wright, Henry, quoted in Nelson, Truman, introduction to Documents of Upheaval: Selections from William Lloyd Garrison's The Liberator, 1831–1865 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1966), xiii.Google Scholar
14. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Free Speech and Free Inquiry,” in Selections, 239.Google Scholar
15. Garrison, William Lloyd, “A Layman's Reply to a ‘Clerical Appeal,’” Liberator, 08 18, 1837, 1.Google Scholar
16. Letter from New England Spectator, quoted in Garrison, , “Layman's Reply.”Google Scholar
17. Tappan, Lewis, quoted in McKivigan, James, The War Against Pro-Slavery Religion: Abolition and the Northern Churches, 1830–1865. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984., 60.Google Scholar For accounts of the Protestant establishment's antislavery initiatives and Garrison's resistance to them, see McKivigan, , 24–59Google Scholar; Friedman, Lawrence, Gregarious Saints: Self and Community in American Abolitionism, 1830–1870. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982., 3–33Google Scholar; and Abzug, Robert, Cosmos Crumbling: American Reform and the Religious Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
18. Mott, Frank Luther, American Journalism: A History. New York: Macmillanillen, 1962., 215 n. 2.Google Scholar The following account of the antebellum newspaper marketplace is taken from Mott, , 114–254Google Scholar; Schudson, Michael, Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic, 1978., 11–28Google Scholar; and Formisano, Ronald, The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts Parties, 1790s–1840s. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983., 16–20.Google Scholar
19. Stanton, Henry, in Proceedings of 1837, xxxiv.Google Scholar
20. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Prospectus of the Liberator,” Liberator, 12 15, 1837, 3.Google Scholar
21. William Lloyd Garrison seemed to share de Tocqueville's suspicion of popular opinion as a socially embedded form of power that had superseded categories of government. For an analysis of this point in de Tocqueville, see Lefort, Claude, “From Equality to Freedom: Fragments of an Interpretation of Democracy in America,” in Democracy and Political Theory, ed. and trans. Macey, David (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988), 189–203.Google Scholar
22. See Perry, Lewis, Radical Abolition: Anarchy and the Government of God in Antislavery Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1973.Google Scholar; and Brock, Peter, Radical Pacifists in Antebellum America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
23. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Vindication of the Liberator,” in Selections, 186.Google Scholar
24. See Habermas, , Structural Transformation, 23–25.Google Scholar
25. Warner, , Letters of the Republic, 62.Google Scholar
26. Garrison, William Lloyd to Johnson, Oliver, 05 12, 1840Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , A House Divided, 607, emphasis added.Google Scholar
27. Garrison, William Lloyd, quoted in Garrison, Wendell Phillips and Garrison, Francis Jackson, William Lloyd Garrison: The Story of His Life, Told by His Children. 1885–1889; rept. New York: Negro University Press, 1969., 2: 267–68.Google Scholar
28. See Brown, , Knowledge Is Power, 230.Google Scholar
29. Garrison, William Lloyd to Quincy, Edmund, 12 14, 1844Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , No Union, 271.Google Scholar
30. For this aspect of republican political economy, see Warner, , Letters of the Republic, 121–34.Google Scholar
31. Garrison, William Lloyd to the Financial Committee of the Liberator, 09 28, 1840Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , No Union, 667.Google Scholar
32. The accounts of republican political economy are legion, but my characterization relies on Crowley, J. E., This Sheba, Self: The Conceptualization of Economic Life in Eighteenth Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.Google Scholar; and Lerner, Ralph, The Thinking Revolutionary: Principle and Practice in the New Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987., 195–221.Google Scholar
33. Garrison, William Lloyd to Pease, Elizabeth, 10 25, 1846Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , No Union, 444.Google Scholar
34. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Cradle of Liberty,” Liberator, 04 5, 1839, 3.Google Scholar
35. This characterization of the penny press and Greeley as its early beneficiary is taken from Schudson, , Discovering the News, 17–59Google Scholar; and Foner, Eric: Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press), 14–39.Google Scholar
36. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Address to the Anti-Slavery Electors of Massachusetts,” Liberator, 10, 25, 1839, 2.Google Scholar
37. Garrison, William Lloyd to May, Samuel, 12 12, 1838Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , A House Divided, 414.Google Scholar
38. Resolution quoted in Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 267–68.Google Scholar
39. This focus on print and political strategies to be compared to the exemplary account of abolitionist conflict in Kraditor, Aileen, Means and Ends in American Abolitionism: Garrison and His Critics on Strategy and Tactic, 1834–1850. New York: Pantheon, 1969., 80–167.Google Scholar
40. See Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 276–80.Google Scholar
41. Garrison, William Lloyd, quoted in Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 275.Google Scholar
42. Garrison, William Lloyd, “The Anti-Slavery Organization,” Liberator, 04 5, 1839, 3.Google Scholar
43. “Friends of the Liberator,” quoted in Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 278.Google Scholar
44. Garrison, William Lloyd, “Reply to James G. Birney,” Liberator, 06 28, 1839, 2.Google Scholar
45. Woodbury, , quoted in Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 142.Google Scholar
46. Rogers, , quoted in Garrison, and Garrison, , William Lloyd Garrison, 2: 330.Google Scholar
47. Garrison, William Lloyd, “The American Union,” in Selections, 117.Google Scholar
48. Proceedings of 1837, xxxvi.Google Scholar
49. Garrison, William Lloyd to Woodbury, James T., 08 28, 1837Google Scholar, in Merrill, and Ruchames, , A House Divided, 295–96.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by