Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2009
I begin with a foundational premise: that the basic beliefs about truth and morality that undergird a culture — any culture — are social and discursive constructions. I cannot establish this claim with absolute certainty, although I can provide the reasoning behind such an assertion. I can furnish models that show the explanatory power of such an assertion, and I can provide examples of people who use the premise to useful ends. But finally, the regime of truth I propose — one based on the belief that all truth is provisional and endemic to the culture that produces it — is one accepted on faith. In accepting it, I also accept as credible the rules of meaningmaking, the procedures, the heuristics, and the institutions through which the authority of truths are established in the culture(s) of which I consider myself a part. I can enter into dialogue with the community of those who, at least for the purposes of conversation, share these basic premises with me. With those who do not, I am at an impasse.
1. de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, ed. Mayer, J. P. (Garden City N.Y.: Anchor, 1969), 2: 434Google Scholar.
2. MacIntyre, Alasdair C., Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988)Google Scholar. For a good sociological account of the culture wars, see Hunter, James Davison, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic, 1991)Google Scholar. Hollinger, David A. provides a good definition of pluralism and its relationship to ethnicity in contemporary culture wars in his Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism (New York: Basic, 1995), esp. 79–104Google Scholar.
3. See Poster, Mark, Cultural History and Postmodernity: Disciplinary Readings and Challenges (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Appleby, Joyce, Hunt, Lynn, and Jacob, Margaret, Telling the Truth About History (New York: Norton, 1994)Google Scholar; and Novick, Peter, That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4. For Michel Foucault's model, see especially The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York: Pantheon, 1971)Google Scholar; Foucault, , The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (New York: Pantheon, 1972)Google Scholar; and Foucault, , “Nietzsche, Genealogy, and Power,” in The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 76–100Google Scholar.
5. Mailloux, Steven, Rhetorical Hermeneutics in Theory, in Reconceptualizing American Literary / Cultural Studies: Rhetoric, History, and Politics in the Humanities, ed. Cain, William E. (New York: Garland, 1996), 5Google Scholar. On rhetorical hermeneutics, see Mailloux, Steven, “Rhetorical Hermeneutics,” in Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, ed. Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1988), 345–62Google Scholar. See also Charles Altieri, “Toward a Hermeneutics Responsive to Rhetorical Theory,” and Leff, Michael, “Hermeneutical Rhetoric,” in Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader, ed. Jost, Walter and Hyde, Michael J. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997), 90–107, 196–214Google Scholar; and McCormick, Peter, “After Foundationalism: Interpreting Intentional Actions,” in Anti-Foundationalism and Practical Reasoning: Conversations Between Hermeneutics and Analysis, ed. Simpson, Evan (Edmonton, Alberta: Academic, 1987), 59–75Google Scholar.
6. Shapin, Steven, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 36, 35Google Scholar.
7. I use the term sensus communis here in the way suggested by the work of Giambattista Vico, as the common and relatively uncontested understandings of the concrete life of the community as expressed in its public oratory. See Schaeffer, John D., Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; and Mooney, Michael, Vico in the Tradition of Rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.
8. Emerson to Thomas Carlyle, October 17, 1838, in The Correspondence of Emerson and Carlyle, ed. Slater, Joseph (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), 196Google Scholar.
9. The literature on Emerson and the Divinity School Address is vast. Particularly relevant to my reading of it here are Miller, Perry, “From Edwards to Emerson,” New England Quarterly 13 (1940): 589–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edrich, Mary W., “The Rhetoric of Apostasy,” Texas Studies in Language and Literature 8 (1967): 547–60Google Scholar; Buell, Lawrence, Literary Transcendentalism: Style and Vision in the American Renaissance (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1973), 23–54Google Scholar; and Robinson, David, Apostle of Culture: Emerson as Preacher and Lecturer (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), 123–37Google Scholar. For an account of the Address as the product of a particular moment in Emerson's life, see Cayton, Mary Kupiec, Emerson's Emergence: Self and Society in the Transformation of New England, 1800–1845 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), 163–90Google Scholar.
10. See Rose, Anne C., Transcendentalism as a Social Movement, 1830–1850 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), 70–108Google Scholar; Burkholder, Robert E., “Emerson, Kneeland, and the Divinity School Address,” American Literature 58 (1986): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Habich, Robert D., “Emerson's Reluctant Foe: Andrews Norton and the Transcendental Controversy,” New England Quarterly 65 (1992): 208–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11. Emerson, Ralph Waldo, “An Address Delivered Before the Senior Class in Divinity College, Cambridge, Sunday Evening, 15 July, 1838” (hereafter cited as Divinity School Address), in The Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971), 1: 76Google Scholar.
12. Divinity School Address, 77–80.
13. See Cayton, , Emerson's Emergence, 57–79Google Scholar.
14. Frothingham, Octavius B., Transcendentalism in New England: A History (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1876), 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Pray Without Ceasing,” The Complete Sermons of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. von Frank, Albert J. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1989), 1: 55–62Google Scholar; and The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Plumstead, A. W. and Hayford, Harrison (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969), 7: 28Google Scholar.
15. “I am not ashamed for the Gospel of Christ: for, it is the power of God unto Salvation to every one that believeth” (von Frank, , Complete Sermons, 235Google Scholar).
16. Emerson to Henry Ware Jr., December 30, 1828, in The Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Rusk, Ralph L. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1939), 1: 257Google Scholar.
17. Spirit of the Pilgrims 1, no. 1 (01 1828): 33Google Scholar; and Spirit of the Pilgrims 1, no. 4 (04 1828): 183–84Google Scholar. For a critique of the orthodox hermeneutic from a Unitarian perspective, see Norton, Andrews, “A Statement of Reasons for Not Believing the Doctrines of Trinitarians” (1819), reprinted in Ahlstrom, Sydney E. and Carey, Jonathan S., eds., An American Reformation: A Documentary History of Unitarian Christianity (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1985), 67–75Google Scholar.
18. See Cayton, Mary Kupiec, “Who Were the Evangelicals? Conservative and Liberal Identity in the Unitarian Controversy in Boston, 1804–1833,” Journal of Social History 31 (09 1997): 85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19. Wright, Conrad, The Beginnings of Unitarianism in America (Boston: Starr King, 1955), 4Google Scholar.
20. Channing, William Ellery, “Unitarian Christianity: Discourse at the Ordination of the Rev. Jared Sparks — Baltimore, 1819,” in The Works of William E. Channing, D.D. (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1898), 368, 369Google Scholar.
21. The literature on the sola scripture tradition is vast. For a succinct summary of the Reformation hermeneutic tradition, see Wilson, Barrie A., ed., About Interpretation: From Plato to Dilthey — A Hermeneutic Anthology (New York: Peter Lang, 1986), 103–4Google Scholar. On Locke concerning human understanding and interpretation, see Weinsheimer, Joel C., Eighteenth-Century Hermeneutics: Philosophy of Interpretation in England from Locke to Burke (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993), 23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22. See Commager, Henry Steele, “The Blasphemy of Abner Kneeland,” New England Quarterly 8 (03 1935): 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and French, Roderick S., “Liberation from Man and God in Boston: Abner Kneeland's Free-Thought Campaign, 1830–1839,” American Quarterly 32 (1980): 202–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23. See Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr, The Age of Jackson (Boston: Little Brown, 1945), 356–59Google Scholar.
24. A documentary history of the Kneeland trial is included in Levy, Leonard W., ed., Blasphemy in Massachusetts: Freedom of Conscience and the Abner Kneeland Case — A Documentary Record (New York: DaCapo, 1973)Google Scholar. Many of the documents concerning the Kneeland matter cited in the discussion that follows are contained herein. On the trial itself, see Burkholder, “Emerson, Kneeland”; Levy, Leonard W., Blasphemy: Verbal Offense Against the Sacred, from Moses to Salmon Rushdie (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993), 413–23Google Scholar, and “Satan's Last Apostle in Massachusetts,” American Quarterly 5 (1953): 16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Schlesinger, Age of Jackson. For a view of the general political climate in Boston and Massachusetts at the time, see Formisano, Ronald P., The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts Political Parties, 1790's–1840's (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar, and “Boston, 1800–1840: From Deferential-Participant to Party Politics,” in Boston 1700–1980: The Evolution of Urban Politics, ed. Formisano, Ronald P. and Burns, Constance K. (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1984), 29–58Google Scholar; and Darling, Arthur B., Political Change in Massachusetts, 1824–1848: A Study of Liberal Movements in Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1925)Google Scholar. On political radicalism there, see Pessen, Edward, Most Uncommon Jacksonians: The Radical Leaders of the Early Labor Movement (Albany: State University Press of New York, 1967)Google Scholar.
25. “Political Catechism, printed by the Publisher of the Investigator,” and Boston Investigator, November 14, 1834, both quoted in Howe, Samuel Gridley, “Atheism in New England,” New-England Magazine 8 (01 1835): 59Google Scholar.
26. Pessen, , Most Uncommon Jacksonians, 42–43Google Scholar. On the Workingmen's movement in Massachusetts at this time, see Formisano, , Transformation of Political Culture, 222–44Google Scholar.
27. See Howe, Samuel Gridley, “Atheism in New England,” New-England Magazine 7 (12 1834): 500–509Google Scholar; and 8 (January 1835): 53–62.
28. [Parker, Samuel D.], Report of the Arguments of the Attorney of the Commonwealth, at the Trials of Abner Kneeland, for Blasphemy, in the Municipal and Supreme Courts, in Boston, January and May, 1834 (Boston: Beals, Homer, 1834), 13, 81, 88 n., 82, 60Google Scholar.
29. Ibid., 13, 16.
30. See Dunlap, Andrew, A Speech Delivered Before the Municipal Court of the City of Boston in Defence of Abner Kneeland on an Indictment for Blasphemy January Term, 1834 (Boston, 1834)Google Scholar.
31. Boston Investigator, 03 24, 1837Google Scholar.
32. Kneeland, Abner, Speech of Abner Kneeland Delivered Before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Boston, in His Own Defence on an Indictment for Blasphemy, November Term, 1834 (Boston: J. Q. Adams, 1834), [iii]Google Scholar.
33. For Kneeland's philosophical creed, see Kneeland, Abner, An Introduction to the Defence of Abner Kneeland, Charged with Blasphemy, Before the Municipal Court in Boston, Massachusetts, January Term, 1834 (Boston, 1834), 39Google Scholar.
34. Thacher, Peter, “Charge to the Jury in the Trial of Abner Kneeland on an Indictment for Blasphemy, Municipal Court of the City of Boston, January, 1834,” reprinted in Lawson, John D., ed., American State Trials (St. Louis: Thomas Law Book, 1921), 13: 508Google Scholar.
35. “Characteristics of Modern Infidelity,” Christian Examiner 36 (09 1834): 36–37Google Scholar.
36. Christian Register and Boston Observer, 06 10, 1837, 3Google Scholar.
37. Dunlap, , A Speech, 18Google Scholar.
38. On Rev. Samuel K. Lothrop's position on the controversy, see his A Sermon Preached at the Church in Brattle Square, on Sunday Morning, June 17, 1838 (Boston: I. R. Butts, 1838)Google Scholar.
39. Kneeland, Abner, A Review of the Trial, Conviction, and Final Imprisonment in the Common Jail of the County of Suffolk, of Abner Kneeland, for the Alleged Crime of Blasphemy (Boston: George A. Chapman, 1838), 60–61Google Scholar.
40. Theodore Parker to George Ellis, quoted in Sanborn, Franklin B. and Harris, William T., A. Bronson Alcott: His Life and Philosophy, 2 vols. (Boston, 1893), 1: 281Google Scholar.
41. See, for example, Thomas, John L., The Liberator: William Lloyd Garrison — A Biography (Boston: Little, Brown, 1963), esp. 114–280Google Scholar, and “Antislavery and Utopia,” in The Antislavery Vanguard: New Essays on the Abolitionists, ed. Duberman, Martin (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), 240–61Google Scholar; Kraditor, Aileen, Means and Ends in American Abolitionism: Garrison and His Critics on Strategy and Tactics, 1834–1850 (New York: Pantheon, 1969)Google Scholar; Perry, Louis, Radical Abolitionism: Anarchy and the Government of God in Antislavery Thought (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1973)Google Scholar; and Friedman, Lawrence J., Gregarious Saints: Self and Community in American Abolitionism, 1830–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 43–67Google Scholar.
42. Rantoul, Robert Jr, “Oration at Scituate,” in Memoirs, Speeches and Writings, ed. Hamilton, Luther (Boston: John P. Jewitt, 1854), 278Google Scholar.
43. Shaw, Lemuel, American Jurist and Law Magazine 7 (01 1832)Google Scholar, reprinted in Zainaldin, Jamil, Law in Antebellum Society: Legal Change and Economic Expansion (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1983), 107Google Scholar.
44. On the codification movement in antebellum America and in Massachusetts in particular, see Cook, Charles M., The American Codification Movement: A Study of Antebellum Legal Reform (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1981), 173–81Google Scholar; Levy, Leonard W., The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957), 196–202Google Scholar; Zainaldin, , Law in Antebellum Society, 90–96Google Scholar; Horwitz, Morton J., The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977), 257–58Google Scholar; and Hall, Kermit L., The Magic Mirror: Law in American History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 126–27Google Scholar.
45. Channing, , Works, 735Google Scholar; Boston, Evening Transcript, 10 22, 1835Google Scholar, quoted in Hammett, Theodore M., “Two Mobs of Jacksonian Boston: Ideology and Interest,” Journal of American History 62 (1976): 864–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Boston, Commercial Gazette, 10 3, 1835Google Scholar.
46. “Dialogue Between C., a Colonizationist, and A., an Abolitionist, on the Subject of the Anti-Slavery Society,” Abolitionist 1, no. 8 (08 1833): 116Google Scholar.
47. Liberator, 08 29, 1835, 3Google Scholar.
48. See Hammett, “Two Mobs”; and Grimsted, David, “Rioting in its Jacksonian Setting,” American Historical Review 77 (1972): 361–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49. Boston, Commercial Gazette, 08 21, 1834Google Scholar.
50. “The Sunday Riot,” Christian Register and Boston Observer, 06 17, 1837, 3Google Scholar.
51. Hill, Alonzo, quoted in The Sixteenth Report of the American Unitarian Association, with the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, May 30, 1837 (Boston, 1837), 24Google Scholar.
52. See Cayton, “Who Were the Evangelicals?”
53. Stowe, Harriet Beecher to “My dear brother,” in The Autobiography of Lyman Beecher, 2: 82Google Scholar, reprinted in Ahlstrom, and Carey, , American Reformation, 19Google Scholar.
54. Frothingham, Octavius Brooks, Boston Unitarianism, 1820–1850: A Study of the Life and Work of Nathaniel Langdon Frothingham (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1890), 93, 2–3Google Scholar.
55. Wright, Conrad, “Ministers, Churches, and the Boston Elite,” in The Unitarian Controversy: Essays on American Unitarian History (Boston: Skinner, 1994), 37–58Google Scholar; Pease, Jane H. and Pease, William H., “Whose Right Hand of Fellowship? Pew and Pulpit in Shaping Church Practice,” in American Unitarianism, 1805–1865, ed. Wright, Conrad Edick (Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society and Northeastern University Press, 1989), 181–206Google Scholar; Sykes, Richard Eddy, “Massachusetts Unitarianism and Social Change: A Religious Social System in Transition, 1780–1870” (Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota, 1966), 122, 133Google Scholar; and Cayton, “Who Were the Evangelicals?”
56. Frothingham, , Boston Unitarianism, 193–94Google Scholar. Especially problematic, given the conservatism of Unitarianism's rank and file, was the increasing radicalism of the Harvard Divinity School in the 1830s. On that topic, see Gary L. Collinson, “‘A True Toleration’: Harvard Divinity School Students and Unitarianism, 1830–1859,” in Wright, , American Unitarianism, 209–37Google Scholar.
57. Sykes, , “Massachusetts Unitarianism,” 82, 163–202Google Scholar.
58. Ware, Henry Jr, Sober Thoughts on the State of the Times, Addressed to the Unitarian Community, American Unitarian Association Tracts, 1st ser., no. 99 (Boston, 1835)Google Scholar, reprinted in Ahlstrom, and Carey, , American Reformation, 366Google Scholar.
59. Miller, Perry, The Transcendentalists: An Anthology (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950), 60Google Scholar.
60. Hedge, Frederic Henry, “Coleridge,” Christian Examiner 14 (03 1833): 109–29Google Scholar, reprinted in Miller, , Transcendentalists, 69Google Scholar.
61. See Alcott, Bronson's Record of Conversations on the Gospels Held in Mr. Alcott's School, Unfolding the Doctrine and Discipline of Human Culture (Boston: J. Munroe, 1836–1837)Google Scholar.
62. Miller, , Transcendentalists, 177–78Google Scholar, reprinted from Christian Examiner 23 (11 1837): 170–94Google Scholar. On the Transcendentalists' characteristic use of language, see Albanese, Catherine, Corresponding Motion: Transcendental Religion and the New America (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1977), 56–97Google Scholar.
63. Miller, , Transcendentalists, 92–94Google Scholar, reprinted from Christian Examiner 18 (07 1835): 345–68Google Scholar.
64. See Miller, , Transcendentalists, 102–3Google Scholar, reprinted from Christian Examiner 20 (05 1836): 153–69Google Scholar.
65. See Miller, , Transcendentalists, 183–86Google Scholar; reprinted from the Boston Quarterly Review 1 (01 1838): 83–106Google Scholar. The best overall work on Brownson remains Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr, A Pilgrim's Progress: Orestes A. Brownson (Boston: Little, Brown, 1939)Google Scholar.
66. My inventory of the responses to the Address has been taken from Burkholder, Robert E. and Myerson, Joel, Emerson: An Annotated Secondary Bibliography (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1985)Google Scholar.
67. Ware, Henry Jr, The Personality of the Deity: A Sermon, Preached in the Chapel of Harvard University, September 23, 1838 (Boston: James Munroe, 1838), 23Google Scholar.
68. [Norton, Andrews], “The New School in Literature and Religion,” Boston Daily Advertiser, 08 27, 1838, 2Google Scholar.
69. Norton, Andrews, A Discourse on the Latest Form of Infidelity; Delivered at the Request of the “Association of the Alumni of the Cambridge Theological School,” on the 19th of July, 1839 (Cambridge, Mass.: J. Owen, 1839), 4, 37Google Scholar.
70. Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 12 (01 1840): 61Google Scholar.
71. G[ilman], S[amuel], “Ralph Waldo Emerson,” Southern Rose 7 (11 24, 1838): 106Google Scholar.
72. Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review, 38, 64Google Scholar.
73. Cooke, Parsons, “Transcendentalism Translated,” Boston Recorder 24 (03 22, 1839): 45Google Scholar.
74. “The Latest Form of Infidelity,” Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 12 (01 1840): 31–71Google Scholar; Cooke, Parsons, “Transcendentalism Translated,” Boston Recorder 24 (03 22, 1839): 45Google Scholar; Quarterly Christian Spectator, “Review of An Address Delivered Before the Senior Class in Divinity College, Cambridge, Sunday Evening, 15 July 1838,” 10 (11 1838): 670–74Google Scholar; H., , “The Unitarians and Mr. Emerson,” Christian Witness, ca. 10 1838Google Scholar, reprinted in Christian Register 17 (10 13, 1838): 163Google Scholar; “Review of An Address Before the Senior Class…”, Christian Watchman, ca. Mid–10 1838Google Scholar; and [Whittemore, Thomas], “Differences Among Unitarians,” Trumpet and Universalist Magazine 20 (10 27, 1838): 74Google Scholar. For a later Unitarian response discussing explicitly interpretational differences among the Orthodox, Unitarians, and the Transcendentalists, and in a way that sought to distance the Transcendental hermeneutic from the Unitarian one, see Ellis, George Edward, “Unitarianism, Transcendentalism, and the Bible,” reprinted in Carey, and Ahlstrom, , American Reformation, 441–44Google Scholar.
75. M[ilnes], R[ichard] M[onckton], “American Philosophy: Emerson's Works,” London and Westminster Review 33 (03 1840): 348Google Scholar.
76. [Horace Seaver], Z, “Mr. Emerson and the Unitarians,” Boston Investigator, 10 12, 1838, 3Google Scholar.
77. [Horace Seaver], Z., “Rev. Mr. Emerson,” Boston Investigator, 09 27, 1838Google Scholar.
78. [Norton, Andrews], “The New School in Literature and Religion,” Boston Daily Advertiser, 08 27, 1838, 2Google Scholar.
79. Christian Register 17 (09 29, 1838): 154Google Scholar.
80. Christian Register 17 (10 20, 1838): 166Google Scholar. For some account of Chandler Robbins's ambivalent role in the Divinity School matter, see Cameron, Kenneth Walter, Emerson at the Divinity School: His Address of 1838 and its Significance (Hartford: Transcendental, n.d.), 89–95Google Scholar.
81. Christian Examiner 25 (11 1838): 266–68Google Scholar.
82. See Cayton, Mary Kupiec, “The Making of an American Prophet: Emerson, His Audiences, and the Rise of the Culture Industry in Nineteenth-Century America,” American Historical Review 92 (06 1987): 597–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
83. Garrison, William Lloyd, The “Infidelity” of Abolitionism (Anti-Slavery Tracts, no. 10, new series) (New York: American Anti-Slavery Society, 1860)Google Scholar, reprinted in Pease, William H. and Pease, Jane H., eds., The Antislavery Argument (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), 131–32Google Scholar.
84. See Howe, Daniel Walker, The Political Culture of the American Whigs (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 54Google Scholar.
85. See Howe, Daniel Walker, Making the American Self: Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.
86. Mann, Horace, “The Necessity of Education in a Republican Government,” in Life and Works of Horace Mann, ed. Mann, Mary (Cambridge, Mass., 1867), 2: 143–88Google Scholar, reprinted in Howe, Daniel Walker, ed., The American Whigs: An Anthology (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973), 156Google Scholar.
87. Ibid., 157.
88. Hunter, , Culture Wars, 308Google Scholar.
