No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Anthropic Explanations in Cosmology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2023
Extract
Cosmologists often claim that our universe is “fine tuned” for life. A change by 1% in the strong nuclear force would have meant little carbon would exist, and carbon can seem biologically essential. Again, the riches of chemistry and biochemistry depend on the neutron’s being heavier than the proton by no more than 0.1%. The early cosmic expansion rate may have needed fine tuning to one part in l055 to prevent speedy recollapse and speedy disintegration. To prevent excess turbulence the “smoothness” perhaps needed fine tuning to one part in 10 raised to the power of 10123 (a number far greater than 101230). Etcetera (Leslie 1982, 1983a, 1985, 1986).
The list of such claims is very long. No doubt some of its items are mistakes. Others may be dictated by basic physics so that they are not fine-tunable.
- Type
- Part I. Physics
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986
References
Barrow, J.D. and Turner, M.S (1981). “Inflation in the Universe.” Nature 292: 35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1985). “Coincidences: Mundane and Cosmological.” For the Conference “Origin and Evolution of the Universe: Evidence for Design?”, Royal Society of Canada, McGill University, 30 May-1 June, 1985.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1986). “The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy and the Argument from Design.” Paper (seen only in draft) reflecting a debate at York University, 12 November 1985.Google Scholar
Leslie, John. (1982). “Anthropic Principle, World Ensemble, Design.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 141–151. (Errata in 21: 381.)Google Scholar
Leslie, John (1983a). “Cosmology, Probability and the Need to Explain Life.” In Scientific Explanation and Understanding. (CPS Publications in Philosophy of Science.) Edited by Nicholas Rescher. Lanham and London: University Press of America. Pages 53-82.Google Scholar
Leslie, John (1983b). “Observership in Cosmology: the Anthropic Principle.” Mind 92: 573–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, John. (1985). “Modern Cosmology and the Creation of Life.” In Evolution and Creation. Edited by Ernan McMullin. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pages 91-120.Google Scholar
Leslie, John. (1986). “The Scientific Weight of Anthropic and Teleological Principles.” In Current Issues in Teleology. (CPS Publications in Philosophy of Science.) Edited by Nicholas Rescher. Lanham and London: University Press of America. Pages 111–119.Google Scholar
Linde, A.D. (1982). “A new inflationary Universe scenario.” Physics Letters 108B: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linde, A.D.. (1983). “The new inflationary Universe scenario.” In The Very Early Universe. Edited by G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pages 205–249.Google Scholar
Linde, A.D.. (1984). “The inflationary universe.” Reports on Progress in Physics 47: 925–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazenko, A.D., Unruh, G.W and Wald, R.M. (1985). “Does a phase transition in the early universe produce the conditions needed for inflation?” Physical Review 31D: 273–282.Google Scholar
Tryon, E.P. (1973). “Is the Universe a Vacuum Fluctuation?” Nature 246: 396–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J.A. (1973). “Beyond the End of Time.” In Gravitation. Edited by C.W. Misner, K.S. Thome and J.A. Wheeler. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company. Pages 1196–1217.Google Scholar