Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T05:43:37.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Intelligence, Psychology, and the Philosophy of Discovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Paul Thagard
Paul Thagard*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In their contributions to this volume, Bruce Buchanan (1983) and Lindley Darden (1983) have provided compelling reasons why philosophers of science concerned with the nature of scientific discovery should be aware of current work in artificial intelligence. Buchanan presents abundant examples of the mechanization of generation of empirical hypotheses in current AI programs, while Darden, at a more speculative level, discusses the use of analogy in theoretical discovery. The implication of both these studies is that the philosophy of discovery can profitably borrow notions from work in artificial intelligence, since useful analogies can be found between problems in that field and the problems facing philosophers studying scientific discovery.

I have no quarrel with this claim, except that it is too weak. I shall argue that work in AI is not only useful but essential for investigations in philosophy of science concerning discovery. The connecting link between the two fields is empirical cognitive psychology.

Type
Part III. Discovery, Heuristics, and Artificial Intelligence
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1982 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1982 , 1982 , pp. 166 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am grateful for useful discussions with Keith Holyoak, Lindley Darden, and Bruce Buchanan.

References

Anderson, J.R. (1980). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B.G. (1983). “Mechanizing the Search for Explanatory Hypotheses.” In PSA 1982. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Nickles, T.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 129-146.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. (1974). “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper. (The Library of Living Philosophers. Volume 14, Book I.) Edited by P. Schilpp. La Salle, III.: Open Court. Pages 413-463.Google Scholar
Chi, M.; Feltovich, P.; and Glaser, R. (1981). “Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices.” Cognitive Science 5: 121-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. and Maull, N. (1977). “Interfield Theories.” Philosophy of Science 44: 43-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. and Maull, N. (1980). “Theory Construction in Genetics.” In Scientific Discovery; Case Studies. Edited by Nickles, T.. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 151-170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. and Maull, N. (1983). “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction.” In PSA 1982. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Nickles, T.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 147-165.Google Scholar
Gick, M. and Holyoak, K. (1980). “Analogical Problem Solving.” Cognitive Psychology 12: 306-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, M. and Holyoak, K. (1983). Cognitive Psychology. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Goldman, A.I. (1978). “Epistemics: The Regulative Theory of Cognition.” Journal of Philosophy 75: 509-523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P.; Bradshaw, G.; and Simon, H. (1981). “BACON.5: The Discovery of Conservation Laws.” CIP Working Paper no. 430. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Larkin, J.; McDermott, J.; Simon, D.; and Simon, H. (1980). “Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems.”. Science 208: 1335-1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. (1974). Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lenat, D. (1982) “The Nature of Heuristics.” Artificial Intelligence 19: 189-249.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1980). The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Minksy, M. (1975). “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision. Edited by Winston, P.H.. New York: McGraw Hill. Pages 211-277.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Language, Mind, and Knowledge. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 7). Edited by Gunderson, K.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pages 131-193. (As reprinted in Philosophical Papers Volume 2 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. Pages 215-271.Google Scholar
Reiohenbach, H. (1938). Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R.B. and Goldstein, I.P. (1977). “The FRL Primer.” MIT AI Laboratory Memo 408.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization. Edited by Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B.B.. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pages 27-48.Google Scholar
Simon, H.; Langley, P. and Bradshaw, G. (1981). “Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving.” Synthese 47: 1-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, . and Medin, D. (1981). Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thagard, P. (1980). “Against Evolutionary Epistemology.” In PSA 1980. Volume 1. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Giere, R.N.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 187-196.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1982). “From the Descriptive to the Normative in Psychology and Logic.” Philosophy Of Science 49: 24-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, W. (1849). Of Induction, with Especial reference to Mr. J. Stuart Mill's System of Logic. London. (As reprinted as “Mr. Mill's Logic.” In William Whewell's Theory of Scientific Method. Edited by Butts, R.E.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968. Pages 265-308.Google Scholar
Winston, P. (1980). “Learning and Reasoning by Analogy.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 23: 689-703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, P. and Horn, B., (1981). LISP. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar