Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T03:46:39.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catastrophe Theory: A Preliminary Critical Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Héctor J. Sussmann
Héctor J. Sussmann*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this work Is to present a sketchy description of Catastrophe Theory (CT), as well as a critical analysts of some of Its alleged applications. Our paper must not be regarded as a complete study of all the uses of the theory, since only some of them will be discussed. The choice of what to Include has been made by taking Into account limitations of space, the author's fields of expertise, and his philosophical biases. Because of the author's biases - his “neo-posftivist, Popperian” view of science - it was decided not to include an analysis of the applied work of Rene Thorn, except for one example which is only used for Illustrative purposes. Because of the author's Interest In the uses of Mathematics In the social sciences, only the applications to political science, sociology and economics will be studied here.

Type
Part VII. Mathematics and Philosophy of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1976 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1976 , 1976 , pp. 256 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreski, S. Social Sciences as Sorcery. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Golubitsky, M. and Guillemin, V. Stable Mappings and Their Singularities. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
Panaty, C. “Catastrophe Theory.” Newsweek (January 19,,1976): 54-55.Google Scholar
Thom, R. “Answer to Christopher Zeeman's Reply.” In Dynamical Systems - Warwick 1974. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 463. Edited by Dold, A. and Eckman, B.. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975. Pages 384-389.Google Scholar
Thom, R. “Language et Catastrophes.” In Dynamical Systems. Edited by Peixoto, M.. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pages 619-654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, R. “A Global Dynamical Scheme for Vertebrate Embryology.” In Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, 5. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, 1973. Pages 3-45.Google Scholar
Zeeman, E.C., Hall, C.S., Harrison, P.J., Marriage, G.H. and Shapland, P.H. “A Model for Institutional Distrubances.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (1976) to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, E.C. and Isnard, C.A. “Some Models from Catastrophe Theory in the Social-Sciences.” In Use of Models in the Social Sciences. Edited by Collins, L.. London: Tavistock, 1975.Google Scholar
Zeeman, E.C. “On the Unstable Behavior of Stock Exchanges.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1 (1974): 39-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, E.C. “Catastrophe Theory.” Scientific American (April, 1976): 65-83.Google Scholar