Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T14:49:46.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economics, Risk-Cost-Benefit Analysis, and the Linearity Assumption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

K. S. Shrader-Frechette*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara

Extract

Risk assessment, or risk-cost-benefit analysis (RCBA), an offshoot of decision analysis, has been widely touted as a “developing science” (see, for example, Levine 1979, p. 634). Used to help administrators make decisions on how to spend money, this set of procedures is directed at calculating whether the expected benefits from a proposed activity outweigh its expected risks or costs. For example, experts might wish to determine, given the risk of nuclear core melt and the possible resultant release of radioactive materials, whether additional containment (for reactor vessels) would be cost-effective.

In the sixties, RCBA was integrated into the planning and budgeting efforts of many federal agencies in the defense, aerospace, and energy fields. In the seventies, a number of regulatory agencies controlling environmental and occupational hazards likewise began to use the technique.

Type
Part V. Measurement, Verisimilitude and Decision
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

An earlier version of this paper was presented on December 1, 1981, at the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science. I am grateful to Professors Joseph Agassi, Robert Cohen, Sheldon Krimsky, and Marx Wartofsky for comments which enabled me to strengthen this essay.

References

Arrow, K.J. (1964). Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ashley, H. et al. (eds.). (1976). Energy and the Environment: A Risk-Benefit Approach. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. (eds.). (1966). Social Indicators. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bazelon, D. (1979). “Risk and Responsibility.” Science 20-5: 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braybrooke, D. and Schotch, P. (1981). “Cost-Benefit Analysis Under the Constraint of Meeting Needs.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Burnham, J. (1979). “Panel: Use of Risk Assessment….” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 583689.Google Scholar
Burns, S. (1977). “Congress and the Office of Technology Assessment.” George Washington Law Review 45: 11231150.Google Scholar
Carter, L. (1979). “Dispute Over Cancer Risk Quantification.” Science 203: 13241325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, B. and Lee, I. (1979). “A Catalog of Risks.” Health Physics 36: 707722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comar, C. (1979). “Risk: A Pragmatic De Minimis Approach.” Science 203: 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Committee on Public Engineering Policy. (1972). Perspectives on Benefit-Risk Decision Making. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
Fairley, W. (1975). “Criteria for Evaluating the ‘Small’ Probability….” In Okrent (1975). Pages 415452.Google Scholar
Fairley, W. (1979) “Panel: Accident Risk Assessment.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 371476.Google Scholar
Farmer, F. (1979). “Energy Risks Compared to Other Societal Risks.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 157172.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B. et al. (1975). “Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking.” In Okrent (1975). Pages 291329.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B. et al. (1978). “How Safe is Safe Enough?Policy Sciences 9: 127152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. et al. (1980). “Facts and Fears.” In Schwing and Albers (1980). Pages 181216.Google Scholar
Gage, S. (1979). “Risk Assessment In Governmental Decision Making.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 514.Google Scholar
Gardenier, J. (1979). “Panel: Accident Risk Assessment”. In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 371476.Google Scholar
Gibson, S. (1975). “The Use of Quantitative Risk Criteria in Hazard Analysis.” In Okrent (1975). Pages 591608.Google Scholar
Gross, B. (1966). “Preface: A Historical Note on Social Indicators.” In Bauer (1966). Pages ixxviii.Google Scholar
Häfele, W. (1975). “Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs in Nuclear Power Generation.” In Ashley, et al. (1976). Pages 141184.Google Scholar
Häfele, W. (1979). “Energy.” In Starr and Ritterbush (1979). Pages 129140.Google Scholar
Hollister, H. (1979). “The DOE's Approach to Risk Assessment.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 3558.Google Scholar
Jellinek, S. (1979). “Risk Assessment at the EPA.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 5971.Google Scholar
Kasper, R. (1977). “Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Decision-making.” George Washington Law Review 45: 10131024.Google Scholar
Kasper, R. (1979). “Panel: Use of Risk Assessment….” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 583689.”Google Scholar
Kasper, R. (1980). “Perceptions of Risk and Their Effects on Decision Making.” In Schwing and Albers (1980). Pages 71-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneese, A. et al. (1979). “A Study of the Ethical Foundations of Benefit-Cost Analysis Techniques.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Lave, L. (1979a). “Discussion.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 186-211.Google Scholar
Lave, L. (1979b). “Panel: Perception of Risk.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 477-582.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (1979). “Panel: Use of Risk Assessment… .” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 583689.Google Scholar
Lovins, A. (1977). “Cost-Risk-Benefit Assessment in Energy Policy.” George Washington Law Review 45: 911943.Google Scholar
Lowrance, W. (1976). Of Acceptable Risk. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Lowrance, W. (1979). “Discussion.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 152157.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. (1979). Managing Low-Level Radioactive Wastes.” In Watson (1979). Pages 400419.Google Scholar
Mitre Corporation (1979). Symposium/Workshop…Risk Assessent and Governmental Decision Making. McLean, Virginia: The Mitre Corporation.Google Scholar
Okrent, D. (ed.). (1975). Risk-Benefit Methodology and Application. Los Angeles: UCLA School of Engineering and Applied Science.Google Scholar
Okrent, D. and Whipple, C. (1977). Approach to Societal Risk Acceptance Criteria and Risk Management. PB-271 264. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Okrent, D. (1979). “Panel: Use of Risk Assessment….” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 583689.Google Scholar
Okrent, D. (1980). “Comment on Societal Risk.” Science 208: 372375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otway, H. (1977). “Risk Assessment and the Social Response to Nuclear Power.” Journal of the British Huclear Engineering Society 16: 327333.Google Scholar
Philipson, L. (1979). “Panel: Accident Risk Assessment.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 371–176.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. (1977). An Anatomy of Risk. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schwing, R. and Albers, W.A (eds.). (1980). Societal Risk Assessment. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. (1969). “Social Benefits versus Technological Risk.” Science 165: 12321238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. (1972). “Benefit-Cost Studies in Sociotechnical Systems.” In Committee (1972). Pages 1742.Google Scholar
Starr, C. et al. (1976). “Philosophical Basis for Risk Analysis.” Annual Review of Energy 1: 629662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. (1979). Current Issues in Energy. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Starr, C. and Ritterbush, P. (1979). Science, Technology and the Human Prospect. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Starr, C. and Whipple, C. (1980). “Risks of Risk Decisions.Science 208: 11141119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1975). Reactor Safety Study; An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (ed.). (1979). Low Level Radioactive Waste Management. Proceedings, Twelfth Midyear Topical Symposium. Williamsburg, Virginia: Health Physics Society.Google Scholar
Whipple, C. (1979). “Panel: Public Perceptions of Risk.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 477582.Google Scholar
Yellin, J. (1977). “Judicial Review and Nuclear Power: Assessing the Risks of Environmental Catastrophe.” George Washington Law Review 45: 969993.Google Scholar
Zechhauser, R. (1975). “Procedures for Valuing Lives.” Public Policy 239: 419464.Google Scholar
Zivi, S. (1979). “Panel: Public Perceptions of Risk.” In Mitre Corporation (1979). Pages 477-582.Google Scholar