No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Waves, Particles, Independent Tests and the Limits of Inductivism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In this paper, I shall be taking exception to a few of the ideas in Peter Achinstein's recent (1991). In some of these cases, I think he is flat wrong. But that does not diminish in the least my admiration for his book which is, in my judgment, the best extended piece of work we have on the epistemological problems posed by 19th-century physics.
- Type
- Part VII. Mill, Whewell, and the Wave-Particle Debate
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association
References
Airy, G. (1831), Mathematical Tracts on the lunar and planetary theories …. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Buchwald, J. (1981), “The Quantitative Ether in the First Half of the 19th Century,” in G. Cantor & M. Hodge, eds., Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hersehel, J. (1830), Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, L. (1981), “The Medium and Its Message: A Study of Same Philosophical Controversies about Ether,” in G. Cantor & M. Hodge, eds., Conceptions of Ether: Studies in the History of Ether Theories, 1740-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, B. (1835), “Remarks on the Nature of Evidence in Support ofa Theory of Light,” Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 18: 275-85.Google Scholar
Powell, B. (1837), “Recent Progress of Optical Science,” British Annual and Epitome of the Progress of Science, 1: 162-210.Google Scholar
You have
Access