Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:20:57.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acceptance in Bayesian Philosophy of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Patrick Maher
Patrick Maher*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Oxygen Theory made its way with extraordinary rapidity among the best philosophers. In 1785 … Berthollet … declared himself a convert … Fourcroy promulgated its doctrines under the name of “La Chimie Francaise” … Guyton de Morveau, who had at first been a strenuous advocate of the phlogistic theory, was invited to Paris, and brought over to the opinions of Lavoisier …. Priestley alone, of all the chemists of great name, would never assent to the new doctrines. (Whewell 1858, vol. 2 pp. 278f.)

Type
Part V: Bayesian Philosophy of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1992 , 1993 , pp. 153 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cavendish, H. (1879), The Electrical Researches of the Honorable Henry Cavendish, J. Clerk Maxwell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, J. B. (1951), Science and Common Sense. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dorling, J. (1974), “Henry Cavendish's Deduction of the Electrostatic Inverse Square Law from lhe Result of a Single Experiment”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 327-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. and Howson, C. (1985), “Newton and Kepler, A Bayesian Approach”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16: 379-385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, L. J. (1967), “On the Principle ofTotal Evidence”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 319-321. Reprinted in I.J. Good, Good Thinking, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1960), “Inductive Inconsistencies”, Synthese 12: 439-469. Reprinted in Carl G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press 1965.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1962), “Deductive-Nomological vs Statistical Explanation”, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science III, H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 98-169.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. (1982), Probability and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Second edition 1970.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1967), Gambling with Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maher, P. (1986), “The Irrelevance of Belief to Rational Action”, Erkenntnis 24: 363-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, P. (1990), “Symptomatic Acts and the Value of Evidence in Causa! Decision Theory”, Philosophy of Science 57: 479-498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, P.. (1993), Betting on Theories. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, J. R. and McKie, D. (1937), “Historical Studies on the Phlogiston Theory-I. The Levity of Phlogiston”, Annals of Science 2: 361-404. ·CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1981), Foundations and Applications of Inductive Probability. Atascadero: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B.C. (1983), “Glymour on Evidence and Explanation”, in Testing Scientific Theories, Earman, J. (ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 165-176.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B.C. (1985), “Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science”, in Images of Science, Churchland, P.M. and Hooker, C. A. (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 245-308.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1858), History of the Inductive Sciences, third edition. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar