Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T16:30:42.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bohmian Model of Quantum Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Craig Callender
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Robert Weingard
Affiliation:
Rutgers University

Extract

Philosophers of science have not paid much attention to recent developments in quantum cosmology. This fact is surprising, since quantum cosmology is replete with conceptual issues involving (e.g.) the fundamental nature of time and space, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and the ultimate meaning of probability. One notable exception, Quentin Smith, has recently examined the Hartle-Hawking (1983) proposal. Trying to make sense of the view, he resorts to an instrumentalist picture, which treats the proposal as merely a heuristic device for the algorithm responsible for predictions. While we do not examine Smith's account here, we would like to contrast it with the model presented in this note, in which a fully realistic interpretation of quantum cosmology is developed.

Recently there has been a resurgence of interest in the de Broglie-Bohm causal interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Type
Part VI. Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharonov, Y. and Albert, D. (1987), “The Issue of Retrodiction in Bohm's Theory”, in Quantum Implications, Hiley, B.J. and Peat, David (eds.). New York: Routledge, 224226.Google Scholar
Albert, D. (1993), Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, D. and Loewer, B. (1988), “Interpreting the Many Worlds Interpretation”, Synthese 77:195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, T. (1985), “TCP, Quantum Gravity, The Cosmological Constant and AH That…”, Nuclear Physics B249: 332360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. and Hiley, B.J. (1993) The Undivided Universe. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghi, N. (1992) “Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty”, Journal of Statistical Physics 67: 843907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. and Hartle, J. (1989), “Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology”, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Kobyashi, S. (ed.). Tokyo: Physical Society of Japan.Google Scholar
Ghiradi, G., Rimini, A. and Weber, T. (1986), Physical Review D34: 470.Google Scholar
Halliwell, J. (1990), “Introductory Lectures on Quantum Cosmology”, in Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes Proc. Jerusalem Winter School, Coleman, S. et al (eds.). New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Hartle, J. and Hawking, S. (1983), “Wave Function of the Universe”, Physical Review D28: 29602975.Google Scholar
Huggett, N. and Weingard, R. (forthcoming), “Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory”, Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Kuchar, K. (1992), “Time and Interpretations of Quantum Gravity” in General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, Kunstatter, K. et al (eds.). New Jersey: World Scientific, 211314.Google Scholar
Pitowsky, I. (1991), “Bohm's Quantum Potentials and Quantum Gravity”, Foundations of Physics 21: 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Q. (forthcoming) “The Physical Meaning of Hawking's Quantum Cosmology”.Google Scholar
Squires, E. (1992), “An Apparent Conflict Between the de Broglie-Bohm Model and Orthodoxy in Quantum Cosmology”, Foundations of Physics Letters 5 7175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, E. and Collins, P. (1993) “Time in a Quantum Universe”, Foundations of Physics 5: 913921.Google Scholar
Unruh, W. and Wald, R. (1989), “Time and the Interpretation of Canonical Quantum Gravity”, Physical Review D40: 25982614.Google Scholar
Vilenkin, A. (1989), Physical Review D39: 1116.Google Scholar